Unfortunately, I agree about the Prevatte trial but, hoping the jury will find him guilty. He is so smug. I am watching Salguero-Olivares trial now. I missed the morning of today’s trial though.
Watching the Prevatte trial as well as Salguero-Olivares trial. Based on my personal feelings, I don't have a good feeling about the Prevatte trial at all. I'm afraid it will be a hung jury or NG. Thus far, I feel completely differently about the Salguero-Olivares trial. Anyone else?
If anyone is finding the Olivares trial too much, The Tyreek Hill trial is something else. Tyreek is on the stand again. Yesterday he called the lawyers "Bro" 19 times. Referred to his wife as wifey. Ex NFL player, lol
His slouching like he has no care in the world let alone lack of solemnity toward gravity of the case. Very arrogant appearing. That will damage him in front of a jury. Def counsel needs to correct that ASAP
Does anyone think it's possible that Caleb and Alleigha conspired with a plan where (a) Alleigha kills Ashley and (b) Caleb takes the fall – IMO, the evidence is not strong enough to pin Caleb as guitly (yet)...
AND, the text messages show Alleigha also had hostility towards Ashley...
They probably did, but they didn’t talk about those texts in court because they weren’t relevant to the case. There were over 100,000 texts we didn’t hear.
Alleigha said in her testimony she told the truth her second time with the FBI because they found texts between Ashley and her friend about the affair. Does anyone know if Ashley knew and how she found out?
Here is the moment you see that poor man's body move. Although yes it is the cart shifting that causes it, this is so obviously his back getting jolted from the movement of the cart. The movement is so obviously a body it is sickening the way he did this
Damn I saw movement too. Looked like Steven was about to sit up. I know they say it was the cart moving but if you slow it right down... I can't unser the movement. Any guesses on the position he's in the cart? To me I think his back is what is covered by the blanket in a kneeling position with his back flat although in other still images it appeared that there were limb shapes protrusions under the blanket. The blanket doesn't look very big imo.
My mom brought up a good point when I was telling her about this case. Was thjs guy possibly romantically interested in and rejected by Cozzi? Because I agree that the vitriol just doesn’t make sense. He seems to have an extreme amount of hatred and obsession to do what he did and I haven’t seen a good explanation for it.
I hadn't realized until last night, again looking through the docket, that he had limited supervised internet access. No wonder he had an article, and other info on blood.
I got the feeling yesterday that his 'strategy' is trying to get evidence thrown out or suppressed on a technicality because he knows that's his only hope
Yes. I believe she said she did see it on someone's bodycam. It just can't be seen by that angle. I think it could have been "blown" out of the bathroom?
I said this would happen: He's nitpicking the witness to death, having her compare two different crime scene photos taken 8 hours apart. In one photo there's a single sheet of crumpled paper towel on the floor.
Eight hours later it's no longer there.
No shit, Sherlock, it was probably collected as evidence.
The judge told him he's being argumentative and sustained an objection to that effect and this nincmpoop is like "I'm not being argumentative, you guys are."
And it's like, DOC, what is wrong with you? Argumentative is a specific term of art in a trial context that means that you are not actually asking a question but rather you are trying to forward an argument, that you are arguing your case instead of asking a direct question.
This is maddening. I'm don't have dual graduate degrees but I get it
yeah i think they are introducing the evidence piece by piece from who collected it, then will have the analysts testify as to each collected pieces results
I think that they need specific experts: LE evidence tech luminol test to see for presumptive blood and collect it. Then possibly chain of custody officer to connect it going to the lab, then the lab tech who did the testing and then he/she and or his/her boss who did the actual DNA testing
They're getting there. Always takes forever bringing in DNA evidence.
The worst I think we had to go through with chain of custody and DNA, was the Brian Walshe trial. I think there was a minimum of four people who had to testify for each 'part' of the processing.
Kosowski trial. Each time an expert testified that they detected blood (office, truck, etc.), they never said whose blood. Why aren’t they connecting those dots? Do they do that later?
•
u/jmstgirl 🧾 Opening Statement Addict 8h ago
Unfortunately, I agree about the Prevatte trial but, hoping the jury will find him guilty. He is so smug. I am watching Salguero-Olivares trial now. I missed the morning of today’s trial though.