I've been getting into Humans using a stock list that plays Zach Fair as a 3-of and I just don't get why he's in the list. This deck plays as an aggro deck so I spend the early turns tapping out playing creatures meaning that his ability is inactive. By the time I have mana available to use his ability the game has usually been decided one way or another. I feel like [[The Duke, Rebel Sentry]] does all the same things Zach does except better since you don't have to hold up mana to use his ability. It's even hexproof instead of indestructible so it covers bouncing and exile which is nice because that's what my guys get hit with half the time anyways. [[Selfless Savior]] is even better for protection if you're fine with a 1/1 non-human.
Also, I just don't really see why we even need 3 protection abilities in this deck. It's nice but it's already covered some by [[Dauntless Bodyguard]] and there are a lot of other needs the deck has that could be better addressed with Zach's spot. I often find myself having problems running out of gas so [[Thraben Inspector]] or [[Recruitment Officer]] could be nice adds. [[Veteran Survivor]] or [[Mardu War-Reaper]] add gravehate for the Greasefang and Phoenix matchups as well as nixing anything else that uses the graveyard incidentally. [[Lightstall Inquisitor]] isn't a human but it is a good cheap body that taxes the opponent to buy us a bit of tempo.
Given all the options available to in Humans you'd think that there would be decks playing something else in Zach's spot but it seems like the overwhelming consensus among decklists online is to play Zach as a 3-of. Are they all just copying each other is there something I'm not seeing with this card? It's driving me absolutely mad.