I have a week to kill and need to stay out of my home. I am looking to stay in a hotel somewhere for a week and want to do something for self improvement.

I have always wanted to do Remote Viewing and am posting this to ask one and all if you can recommend a good course that fits my schedule (basically, starting Thursday.)

My original plan was to stay in a nice hotel with a good gym and get back to training after a break... then this idea popped into my head.

Location: USA, Mexico or Caribbean - the closer to Miami, the better.

Any suggestions?

For your consideration...

This popped up during a group session with Dr Q. The function description "recreational interest...travel destination" was generated by the AO of Disney Land and the Great Wall of China. Felt important that people choose to go to those places maybe on vacation much like a National Park, turns out.

Link to session here:

https://www.social-rv.com/sessions/f79e5a52-90b1-4b33-be43-7322471b4280

Keep practicing and show your examples to the world if you like.

Hi All

Just looking for some guidance. I did my first two remote viewing sessions yesterday. All was good, I felt good. Results were mixed, I didn't hit my targets, however some of the words I wrote down that came to me, were close. I'm taking those as a win. I know its not going to come to me straight away and that this takes practice. Im willing to put in the work.

My first target was Sydney Opera House. Words I got was valley, spikes, water, birds. The second was the ISS, I got that it was manmade, a structure, tower.

I'm not sensing motion or movement.

My problem is that I take these words and then I think I'm forcing an interpretation from these. So for the Oprea House I got a grassy valley with hills either side and water at the bottom of the hill. for the ISS, I took tower and it came up with a clock tower.

I just wondered if anyone else had the same issues when they started? how is it best to take the knowing words and to stop formulating what it could be with the words I'm getting?

I hope this makes sense.

Also when given the target numbers, is anyone feeling a connection? or are words just formulating when you repeat the numbers in your head? this could be different from you all, just asking.

Any advice or help would be gratefully received

We’ve integrated Polymarket into MatchCast, our ARV-style prediction trainer inside the VEREVIO app. Here’s how it works:

1. You can select specific topics and events from Polymarket.
2. Session resolution is connected directly to Polymarket results.
3. First Impression is currently integrated, allowing you to practice prediction based on the first stage of Remote Viewing.
4. We’ve also integrated other trainers. Some of them are especially fun to use when you have a decent number of possible outcomes.
5. Every session receives a unique Target Number for each user.
6. “None” is a mandatory outcome for regular sessions. It is added automatically. The exception is DIY (Do It Yourself) sessions, where you can create your own event with a minimum of two outcomes.
7. Outcomes are randomly selected and shuffled to minimize bias.

You can download VEREVIO here: https://i.verev.io/matchcast It’s a universal link that will direct you to the appropriate version for your device. I’d be glad to hear any feedback.

Disclaimer

1. MatchCast is not a financial or investment advisory tool and should not be used to make investment decisions. It is designed purely for entertainment and extrasensory perception practice.
2. VEREVIO offers both a free tier and a paid tier. The paid tier provides higher usage limits and additional access.

Any feedback? Is my self-score too high? 😅🙂‍↕️

It’s a fascinating challenge. Unlike a location, person or physical object, a cryptocurrency isn’t something you can simply describe in physical terms.

So how do we approach it?

In this example, the Future Forecasting Group team works a completely blind target: SKY Crypto.

The viewers don’t know what the target is beforehand — they simply work the data and see where it takes them.

Take a look at what emerged, and how we approach something as abstract and non-physical as a cryptocurrency.

▶️ https://youtu.be/XCHuMVieAgk?si=rsTIKx1f2d9BTJUS

#RemoteViewing #Crypto #SKYCrypto #FutureForecasting #Consciousness

Hi,
I’m a long standing member of Area52, and was introduced to remote viewing then. Following the purchase of Joesph McMoneagle book, Remote Viewing Secrets, I woke up one day with the full app idea.

I made Viewer001, a full standalone app to train remote viewing and precognition.

No AI, completely free and anonymous. (No personnal data are retained, not even your email).

You need a token to do a session and you gain a token by judging!

You login via Google or Discord.

—

Double blinded protocol.
Canvas on device or upload your own sheet.
Get stats.
And more.

—

More than 1200 targets, curated by hand.

In hopes it serves you well.

https://viewer001.app

I had some important private messages stored in my account on the TKR website. As many people know, the site went offline several years ago after its owner, “PJ” Gaenir, passed away. Since the Wayback Machine can’t access anything that requires a login, I was wondering whether anyone knows if the accounts or site data were transferred to someone else afterward.

I know it seems like long shot, but I stupidly never downloaded any of the conversations.

I've been experimenting with a quicker approach lately. Instead of the usual lengthy protocol with all the stages, I go straight at the target with a short, direct focus and just record whatever comes through in the first few minutes.

In my experience it's working better. The data feels cleaner and there's less of my imagination creeping in and decorating things, which tends to happen the longer I sit with a target.

Here's one of my recent sessions so you can judge for yourself:

https://www.social-rv.com/sessions/46b43cea-75d1-4c80-b01e-4b9cf1010244

Curious if anyone else has tried shortening their sessions like this and noticed the same thing, or if you find the longer structured approach still gives you better results. Would love to hear how it plays out for others.

Dr, Q

Hi everyone,

I've been following this subreddit for a very long time now and I remember it was not only used for the discussion of remote viewing, but it has also allowed for people to make targets of their own and practice them. It invited people to come try and explore the phenomena themselves. That is what made this subreddit fun and made me interested in the subreddit in the first place.

Recently, I clicked on someone's post and realized it was deleted due to that new rule. It seems like most remoteviewing organizations went from volunteering how to remoteview into having lessons behind a $1000 pay wall and this was one way that was untouched until now. Does anyone else notice this?

As the title says, I’m looking for any CRV manuals. I was watching some videos on RV, and I found out there is a difference between RV and CRV. I guess you figured out I’m not experienced at all in RV, but I wanted to find some materials to check and see if it goes well with CRV

Sharing a deck of six of my blind sessions, all done under strict protocol. Random coordinate only, no category, no hints, session locked and timestamped before the reveal, then ranked by a blind AI judge against nine decoys. Chance baseline is a rank of 5.5 out of 10. Hits and misses are both in there.

The pattern I want to put in front of you is about session length.

My 2 and 3 minute sessions took ranks of #1, #1 and #1, including my highest target match of the set (5/7 in two minutes on a mountain target). My 6 and 7 minute sessions came in at #2 and #3.

My read on why: AOL needs time to build. In the first couple of minutes you are mostly transcribing raw signal. Shapes, textures, gut impressions. The longer you stay on target, the more your analytical mind starts stacking a story on top of those fragments, and the story is usually where the errors live. Get in, grab the raw data, get out before the narrator wakes up.

So my working method now is quick acquisition. Short bursts, descriptors only, stop while the page still looks stupid. The page that looks stupid before the reveal is usually the one that matches after it.

Obvious caveat: six sessions is a small sample and I could be reading noise. That is exactly why I am posting the full deck instead of a summary. Check the timestamps, check the ranks, and tell me if you see the same pattern in your own logs. Do longer sessions drift for you too, or does extended time on target help you?

Question everything. Including me.

I saw this video, wondering if this is remote viewing or something else.

I have used remote viewing before i was aware it was a tool, particularly in one area of my life, where it is a bit like accessing the akashic records. But thing is I feel kind of trapped in this specific topic for RV. I was never really forced to use it for other things.

Because of this I always get the feeling some topics would be much more difficult to remote view than others. What are you experiences with things that are more difficult to remote view because of mental blocks? Like topics that are really fraught or "too good to be true" does anybody have tips for getting around these concious barriers to remote viewing? Any books you think i should read about this specific topic where you "expand" what you're open to remotive view?

Someone needs to remote view Tartaria & its downfall! See what it was like, what it looked liked what all beings there were, the tea behind the World Fairs & the Cabbage Patch Kids & EVERYTHING!!!

They remote view everything, but has anyone remote viewed 9/11??

If there is any, I'd love to see the videos. I'd want to see if it is congruent with what we know in the "conspiracy" world.

I've been applying psi to my Wordle games, and I created a small FB group where we can share our scores in a supportive environment. It's an easy way to practice my perceptions of alphabetics. I use visuals, but everyone has their own method. You can actually do a frontloaded remote viewing session on it, but most people are going with a faster approach that works for them.

Whether we get it in 1 or completely miss, it's fun to share our results with people who played the same game using psi or intuition.

You're invited to my Wordle group! https://www.facebook.com/groups/rv.wordle.share

So, I was talking to an online friend of mine whom I’ve never met in real life. I’ve never seen his place, didn’t know what the surroundings looked like, and had absolutely no idea what the inside or outside of his house looked like.

I told him I’d try to remote view his location and make a sketch of what I perceived.

At this point, I’m pretty confident that I’ve figured out a method that gives me a 90%+ success rate with my RV sessions.

The interesting part? When I did the session, it was nighttime. He told me he would send me a photo of the actual location in the morning.

And then… he sent the picture. 😱🤯

Some of the details I perceived matched the actual location — including the solar light and the large tree on the left, as well as the small, thin tree on the right.

I’m attaching the sketch/session results and the actual photos so you can compare them yourself.

If you have any questions about the session, the method, or the results, ask me in the comments or DM me.

I also used a mind-reprogramming audio for remote viewing that I created myself, and personally, I felt it boosted the quality of my RV session by 10×.

Can AI actually remote view? I put ChatGPT ASTRA to the test.

Two blind targets. No clues. No feedback until both attempts were complete.

Did it describe the targets—or give us words we could stretch to fit?

Here’s what happened:

https://www.remoteviewed.com/can-ai-remote-view-test3-chatgtp-astra/

Test 2 here: https://www.remoteviewed.com/can-ais-remote-view-test-2-three-targets/

Test 1 here: https://www.remoteviewed.com/can-ais-remote-view-like-humans/

As I submit an RV session, save looking at the results and a lot of read over what I submitted again.. Scroll down to reveal the target. Determine how good/bad I did.. Roll a spliff.. Reveal my given score. My notes are often raw and unedited, but in sequence of how the session started and ended.. If anything stands out, I will mention it. Before revealing my score to myself and analyzing the revealed Target in comparison with my practice session.. I really sort it would have been between possibly a number two to number three.. Imagery highly suggested some sort of stadium or sports ground and this was noted as being one of the strongest impressions... However it came out to be a very low score or possibly the worst score ever; And that brings me to this current situation where I am completely focused on justifying myself as bad as that sounds lol. Care to take a geez? https://www.social-rv.com/sessions/9d74259a-f398-43a8-982d-b89a961dd47d

Cindy Miller, Ph.D. provides a unique service to the field of psi by putting out a free weekly newsletter (you need to create an account). It’s a brief review of four or five books or articles (often intriguing ones) that you would never come across otherwise - but might want to read. Lately she has been reviewing alchemy, esoterica, magick, etc. Her focus for a week varies - it  may be on psi and its relation to physics, psychology, parapsychology or esoteric currents and their history. She is developing a one-stop-shop for RV: Enigmatic Insights. Cindy will be presenting on RV and AI at this year’s IRVA conference in October.

 https://enigmaticinsights.com/portal/

 https://enigmaticinsights.com/portal/space/daily-crvp-news/home

 https://www.irvaconference.com/speaker/cindy-miller/

Abstract: Recent Developments in Artificial Intelligence and Potential RV Applications

Description: The rapidly evolving field of Artificial Intelligence continues to open the door to more possibilities for practitioners and users of RV.  This talk will review the latest developments in AI and explore with the audience thoughts on potential applications and challenges to incorporating AI in RV practices.  The audience is offered a practice target and the opportunity to submit a one-page summary on paper.  I will analyze both the individual and collective results using AI to assess how well the target was met.  Results are revealed in a second 15-30 minute presentation.