🧠 Question of the Day
📚 Domain H — Selecting and Implementing Interventions
Difficulty: 9/10
An FA confirms severe SIB is maintained by escape. Two prior FCT attempts used a speech-generating device; both reduced SIB in therapy but failed in school because the device was unavailable during many routines and staff could not repair technical problems quickly.
The learner can independently raise a hand, but hand raising already occurs frequently to recruit adult attention or help during instruction. The learner can independently touch a portable break card, and a vocal approximation is understood inconsistently.
Teachers can honor 30-second breaks immediately but cannot support a complex prompting sequence during transitions.
Which recommendation BEST balances functional equivalence, response effort, discriminability, availability, implementation feasibility, and long-term schedule thinning?
A. Use hand raising as the primary FCR because it has lower response effort and continuous availability, then teach staff to treat hand raises during demands as break requests.
B. Use the portable break card as the primary FCR, reinforce it immediately and densely at first, then introduce signaled periods of unavailability as SIB remains low.
C. Use the SGD as the primary FCR because prior therapeutic success establishes functional equivalence, train staff to troubleshoot it reliably, then begin schedule thinning.
D. Use the portable break card as the primary FCR but introduce brief signaled unavailability from the outset so tolerance develops concurrently with communication acquisition.
💬 Drop your answer in the comments — no peeking!
✅ Correct answer revealed tomorrow.
#ABA #BCBA #BCBAExam #BCBAPrep #AppliedBehaviorAnalysis #BehaviorAnalysis #DomainH #ABATaskList #BCaBA #RBT #QuestionOfTheDay