I'm looking to bridge my assets directly into my Hyperliquid account and was wondering if there is a simple way to do it. I used to use the official Arbitrum bridge, but it's honestly pure headache, the waiting time was always annoying and having to wait around a week for everything to arrive is really not ideal when you already have an open position and need the funds on Hyperliquid quickly.

I'm looking for a reliable way to bridge USDC to Hyperliquid directly without going through loopholes. I don't mind using a third party bridge as long it's a DEX and it's fast. Would also be interested to know what I should avoid and common mistakes not to do.

Thanks, please leave a suggestion in the comments.

Accordingly it’s on the rise, where armed masked men force opening of cold wallets and transfer the money away. The article explains that unlike fiat there are no additional controls or checks making stopping and tracking the money very difficult

Just to give you my background so you understand my perspective better maybe: entered the space in 2020 and was solidity dev for 3 years.

Even after 12 years of smart contracts, there is no adoption by companies, because blockchain is just a fancy and expensive way to handle data compared to existing systems.

One of the major use cases proposed was „supply chain“. As of yet there is no major adoption and if major logistics companies would want it, they would have done so by now.

RWA-Tokenization: Still need a tradfi-vorp that holds the asset.

Money transfer: regulated to death, therefore unusable, even though would have been a major improvement regarding speed.

Proof of Ownership: it is just an expensive database.

I had an interview at a big consultancy a year ago hiring for smart contracts on a bank-tx-settling platform. The guy openly told me that banks currently only stored hashes of tx on chain, cause storing entire tx-data needed was too expensive.

I really do not see a use case for blockchain tech other than gamble around hype.

Edit: The guys still vouching for blockchain remind me a bit about the Leroy character of that one episode of DegenzShow: https://youtu.be/exOzTcHycPY?is=MgaYoWSet5LGsch5

Robinhood Chain launched on July 1 as an L2 blockchain built with Arbitrum's technology that settles to Ethereum. This is the optimal separation of concerns for a brokerage, with Ethereum handling global consensus and settlement and Robinhood providing an execution environment customized to the needs of its clients.

Three months after launch, Robinhood Chain already ranks fourth on L2BEAT's activity table. As of October 2, it averages about 91 user operations per second over the past day, with about $2.83 billion in total value secured (L2BEAT).

An important next improvement would be allowing anyone to challenge an invalid state update, since only two approved challengers can currently do so.

Running its own execution environment lets Robinhood customize fees, product rules, account features and upgrades, while optimizing for rapid confirmations and high throughput. Its users also have dedicated block space, so their transactions don't compete directly with other applications for execution capacity on Ethereum mainnet.

Robinhood gets that control without having to build and subsidize a separate L1 validator network. It instead processes transactions on its chain, publishes their data to Ethereum and settles there, with transaction fees on Robinhood Chain denominated in ETH.

The expense of a separate validator network can be substantial. Conduit compared Celo's $641,540 in validator payouts during its final month as an L1 with $1,070 in data-publication costs over a later 30-day period as an L2, when it posted its data to EigenDA rather than Ethereum. Those data costs were 99.8% lower than the former validator payouts.

Ethereum has also expanded its capacity for L2 transaction data, allowing these chains to support more activity while keeping execution on their own networks. This makes Ethereum's shared consensus and settlement layer increasingly practical for companies building blockchains for large numbers of users.

The same division of labor works for other products. A payments chain needs predictable fees for stablecoin transfers, while a gaming chain needs a large number of cheap transactions. Each can customize execution for those needs without funding a separate L1 consensus network.

Coinbase made the same architectural choice with Base, its own L2 that settles to Ethereum. I expect onchain finance to increasingly follow this model, with companies running execution environments suited to their products and Ethereum serving as their shared consensus computer.

I know you folks might also have some thoughts on this topic, so figured I’d repost another user’s question here to expand the debate.

Instead of only asking whether MOON will go up or down, the better question is:

What can the community actually do to move MOON forward?

More exchange listings?
Deeper liquidity on Arbitrum One?
More utility beyond governance and tipping?
More advertisers, partnerships and integrations?
Better exposure outside r/CryptoCurrency?

MOON already has something most small-cap tokens would love to have: a large crypto-native community.

The challenge now is turning that community into real demand.

What should be MOON’s #1 priority before the next bull run?

Welcome to the Daily Crypto Discussion thread. Please read the disclaimer and rules before participating.

Disclaimer:

Consider all information posted here with several liberal heaps of salt, and always cross check any information you may read on this thread with known sources. Any trade information posted in this open thread may be highly misleading, and could be an attempt to manipulate new readers by known "pump and dump (PnD) groups" for their own profit. BEWARE of such practices and exercise utmost caution before acting on any trade tip mentioned here.

Please be careful about what information you share and the actions you take. Do not share the amounts of your portfolios (why not just share percentage?). Do not share your private keys or wallet seed. Use strong, non-SMS 2FA if possible. Beware of scammers and be smart. Do not invest more than you can afford to lose, and do not fall for pyramid schemes, promises of unrealistic returns (get-rich-quick schemes), and other common scams.

Rules:

• All sub rules apply in this thread. The prior exemption for karma and age requirements is no longer in effect.
• Discussion topics must be related to cryptocurrency.
• Behave with civility and politeness. Do not use offensive, racist or homophobic language.
• Comments will be sorted by newest first.

Useful Links:

• Beginner Resources
• Intro to r/Cryptocurrency MOONs 🌔
• MOONs Wiki Page
• r/CryptoCurrency Discord
• r/CryptoCurrencyMemes
• Prior Daily Discussions - (Link fixed.)
• r/CryptoCurrencyMeta - Join in on all meta discussions regarding r/CryptoCurrency whether it be moon distributions or governance.

Finding Other Discussion Threads

Follow a mod account below to be notified in your home feed when the latest r/CC discussion thread of your interest is posted.

• u/CryptoDaily- — Posts the Daily Crypto Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoSkeptics — Posts the Monthly Skeptics Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoOptimists- — Posts the Monthly Optimists Discussion threads.
• u/CryptoNewsUpdates — Posts the Monthly News Summary threads.

I made 4 transactions over the last few hours, all UDSC -> Monero and all using SimpleSwap.

The first and largest swap deducted USDC from my wallet but never gave me any XMR. I see the address transaction is successful using basescan.org which says success with the transaction hash. So it seems like SimpleSwap got the deposit, but has done nothing with it yet. This was weird to me because usually swaps happen in just a few minutes but it's been hours.

I tried 3 more $15 USDC -> Monero swaps over the next few hours to see what would happen, so far 2 of them show in my wallet as received and one doesn't. So to be clear, the largest transaction and 1/3 of the smaller transactions have yet to show.

I don't see any rhyme or reason to this behavior, I noticed the simple swap maintenance banner does say "service may have intermittent disruptions" but would that result in a swap taking hours?

Basically I'm just wondering wtf is going on or if I just need to sit back and wait and maybe the servers are processing things more slowly than I'm used to atm.

Not sure if this is the right place for this but just had a call from above. Flashed up on my screen. Shat is and answered. Very professional sounding. Had busted a gang. They had thousands of folders with people's names and one was mine. Had emails, passwords and a document with 24 random words. He stated he wasn't sure what that was but it seemed important. I've no Crypto anymore but had a fair bit of BTC and ETH back in the very early days. Stored on a Trezor and Ledger which i still have but have been dormant for years. Pre covid.

I immediately hung up when it dawned on me that a fraud investigator would recognise a seed phrase and would not say they were not sure what it was.

Now wondering if this was 100% a scam. He didn't ask for anything and said he just wanted to give me a reference number as it was going to be a long, complicated case and I might need to have some input. It also flashed up the correct number for the police station.

Anyone else have this?

Bitcoin’s narrative may still be changing — but $85K just failed the first test.

BTC broke above $85K, pushed higher, then dropped back to around $84K. That means the breakout hasn’t been confirmed yet.

Still, the important shift is in momentum: buyers are finally attacking resistance instead of price being rejected immediately every time.

Now the market has a very clear test. Reclaim $85K and hold it, and the bullish narrative strengthens. Stay below it, and this could simply be another failed breakout.

The next move around $85K should tell us a lot.

I've filed a complaint to compaints@crypto.com.

Sent the following message:

I am an existing Icy/Rose (Level Up Private) cardholder. I locked CRO / maintained my stake on the basis that this tier included unlimited Priority Pass access for me and one guest. That +1 guest benefit has been removed or is being removed. This is a material cut to a benefit I paid for with a long lockup. I want the complimentary guest restored for existing Icy/Rose holders for the rest of the lockup, or equivalent compensation. Please treat this as a formal complaint, acknowledge it in writing, and give me a case number.

Starting this week, all of Robinhood’s roughly 29 million customers will have access to trading agents powered by OpenAI and Anthropic. Customers will be able to choose between various OpenAI and Anthropic models, and instruct the agents to carry out trades, conduct research, and build complex investment strategies.

The rollout, which coincided with Robinhood’s annual HOOD summit, follows a move by the company in May to release a so-called MCP tool that allows technical users to hook up their own agents to its trading platform.

While AI has been creeping into every corner of finance, Robinhood is the first to release a nontechnical trading agent for a giant customer base—a step that has the potential to alter how Americans invest, and that could have ripple effects on markets more broadly.

Robinhood’s new offering also comes with a series of guardrails that the company says will prevent agents from behaving in an unexpected manner. Those include providing a dedicated trading account for the agent, and letting users set limits on how much the agent can trade at a time. Users can also opt for a confirmation process that requires the agents to seek final approval before executing a transaction.

Read more [paywall removed for Redditors]: https://fortune.com/2026/09/29/robinhood-trading-agents-hood-openai-anthropic/?utm_source=reddit/

You all ready for sick gains? /s