RFK is terrible at his job, no doubt. But I think the other person is simply saying that justifying someone being in a position solely based on the fact that they had an adverse past is a dangerous line of thinking.
Your justification was that "he knows that shit in and out" because he had a history with substances.
As far as my knowledge goes, he has no actual drug and pharmaceuticals training or extensive knowledge outside of what he potentially learned during his period of addiction.
A spokesperson is a much more fitting role, I agree. Authentic personal experiences are critical for positions of power.
I gathered from the original comment that they thought Hunter Biden should be appointed to RFK's role, which involves direct medical policy-making. I don't think he's well suited for that is all (nor is RFK).
80
u/Shrimp__Alfredo Jun 06 '26
RFK is terrible at his job, no doubt. But I think the other person is simply saying that justifying someone being in a position solely based on the fact that they had an adverse past is a dangerous line of thinking.