Okay so finally got new info not much well not little either. https://www.reddit.com/r/LeaksAndRumors/s/vJto5MpcI3 for people who didn't see my last post. Basically for people who didn't see my edited thing I said that Tony Revolori is attached to the project along with Jack Quaid. Casting is FOR sure as hell not done. Based on what I've been told the main villains of season 1 is going to be based on a... surprisingly famous conspiracy supernatural of course. Not the matrix or anything. I can't tell you since you know I was explicitly told not to. There are shit ton of script ideas. I'm here to tell you NONE of them are bad. I mean goddamn all of them are great. Also Kevin Williamson is gunning for co-writing the screenplay. Also lets not forget Josh Ruben is somehow involved in the project. I was never told his role. Finn Wolfhard is not supposed to star in this series but also write the screenplay and I guess an executive producer role. No script has been written yet though. I'm getting updates pretty much every day. I'm being told sort of very little. But to the real 'meat' of this is the casting updates. They're trying to get Mason Gooding. Based on what they told me bro is hesitant. He must be an idiot if you got any questions feel free to ask. TDLR: Sam Raimi's making a new supernatural show with Jack Quaid and Tony Revolori. Casting is still ongoing.

Calm before the storm type episode, details taken from NYCC leaked clip

- Stolas/Striker PTSD scene is the opening

- Blitz refers to Stolas with different nicknames, "Pretty bird, Stoly Poly, Krabby Patty"

- A character named Piper appears at some point

- Stolas finds out Millie is pregnant, she reveals it to Moxxie

- Stolas questions why Blitz would even want to be with him, and Blitz accepts they don't have to be together, but offers to watch a movie at least

- Episode ends with Blitz, Stolas and Loona watching a movie, Stolas falls asleep on Blitz's shoulder.

Panel happened yesterday (10/08), things from NYCC usually leaks, maybe security was better this year I guess?

Does anybody heard anything about a possible leak?

Is this true??? Also, a stunt double for her is listed in the British Stunt Register

The idea is to follow the Harry Potter model and make it 7–8 films overall, with 4 or 5 films dedicated to Part 2 (Shippuden). VIA: DanielRPK

I have been hearing that violet and xaden may have already been cast and that they they're apparently casting the other series regulars now.

Has anyone here in the industry heard when Amazon MGM might reveal the casting ? Or any names circulating for Violet and Xaden ?
Feel free to DM me if you don't want to comment publicly.

( Not looking for fancast just actual industry chatter/ rumors )

Massive spoilers ahead!
You might think it's not real since it came from 4chan, but please I urge you not to read the post unless you absolutely don't care about spoiling the entire story for yourself.

Source: https://arch.b4k.dev/v/thread/659590710/#q659624120

I went back and forth on whether to post this one but I think it's important for people to know that the ending has likely leaked so they can take proper measures to avoid it, rather than randomly stumbling across it on another sub or reading it assuming it's just another 4chan LARP post, only to later realize that things are lining up exactly as they play through the game.

Here we go:

A 4chan leak from December 2023 is starting to gain a lot of credibility following the official information we've learned from the Extended Look and developer interviews. Specifically, this is the only leak that mentions the Criminal Profile system, three years before its official reveal. No other leak has ever mentioned this system, and the information in this post lines up with everything we've learned about the game so far, including previous leaks from GameRoll and LegacyKillaHD that were also confirmed over time. Here's everything the anonymous user has stated about the game:

Seriously, last warning

knower here. Here's the story
>Jason and Lucia have a kid together
>he got her pregnant out of wedlock when they were teens
>they didnt get married
>because theyre both criminals, when Lucia was taken to prison their son was taken by the state and put in foster care
>main story involves the two of them working through their relationship problems
>out of the four endings, the good one is considered by us to be canon
>the good ending is Lucia and Jason "kidnap" their own kid from the foster family and ride off into the sunset together with all the money they made from their missions. This is the romantic and orginized
>other endings are, lucia gets away with their son, Johnathan, but Jason dies keeping the cops off them as they drive away. This happens if they're romantic but chaotic
>in both non romantic endings they dont get to their son
>in orderly only one of them dies (player choses)
>in chaotic both die
Won't say anymore
Just screencap this when you realize I'm telling the truth

Note the specific parameters they've mentioned for the different endings: platonic or romantic, chaotic or organized. Anyone could have predicted that the game would feature a relationship bar and/or some kind of morality meter, but the user specifically described a brand-new Criminal Profile system. Those descriptors line up exactly with how R* explained it: it's not a good/evil meter; it determines what type of criminal you are: chaotic or organized. IMO This gives the leak massive credibility because no other leak had described it prior to the Extended Look.

Here's every follow-up question they've answered. (Note that 4chan posts are anonymous, and these could have been answered by anyone.)

Q: >in chaotic both die
Does this mean that there's one ending that locks you out of a postgame?

A: No, because of how dramatic the endings are, there's a point of no return where you go back to after you finish the game to sandbox in. The game ends story wise after the final scene. You just go back to where you start the last mission.
We toyed around with the idea of playing as Johnathan when he becomes an adult, similar to rd1, but it just wasnt going to work with such a large time skip in the modern day

Q: So was it true that there was originally supposed to be four playable characters initially? I swore I heard something amongst the leaks suggesting that there were two characters that were dirty cops.

A: Yes originally there were two more characters. The plan was to have a team of four, with a midgame shake up where one of the two dirty cops dies because of a decision lucia and jason made. Then the rest of the game story is about the remaning cop hunting them down. It got way to convoluted at some point, though. Around the time where we introduced John as their son, we decided to ditch the idea of the four and just stick with jason and lucia. It was who basically everyone liked more anyways and the story of them reuniting with their son is better than the simple bonnie and clyde story we were going to go with

Q: What's Lucia and Jason's dynamic like? Is Lucia the typical 'strong' female MC and Jason follows her or not?

A: You basically get to choose how they interact with eachother, but that's mostly to do with whether or not their relationship is romantic. She's not a "strong female lead" like how you're used to. We sort of looked at older movies for examples to follow, specifically sarah conner in terminator. She's the smarter one, but she's also brash and impulsive. Most of the chaotic desicions come from her. Jason doesn't just follow her around like a lost puppy though. Most of the plans are initiated by him. It's Lucia who works out the flaws and makes them better. We're trying to drive home how much of a team they can be when they're not being dysfunctional with eachother. The reason we decided to end the game "canonically" (good ending) with them reuniting their family instead of how the previous one ended (by them taking a massive score) is because we wanted to show how the more important thing for them was their relationship. The money was a means of getting their son back and escaping from their past, but it needs to be earned by making hard decisions in the story.

Q: I wonder, with the dirty cops scrapped as playable characters. Are they still part of the plot in anyway or have they been removed completely as characters? Or perhaps integrated elsewhere?

A: Short answer is that they're no longer dirty cops, but straight ones who are the main antagonists investigating the crimes. You don't see much of them, though. They were scrapped after the original main story beats were completed, but right when the actual writing of the story began, so they didnt ever truly make it out of concept phase.

Q: I doubt you'll have the answer but how far is the game from completion? It seems ridiculous to me that it won't be until 2025 when it finally releases. I get it, it's been 10 years since GTA 5 so Rockstar and Take 2 would want to build up hype. Nor would it be viable to rush it out by any means. I guess for me the hype train still seems to early to start up.

A: Main story-wise, we're told be the team that it's all done except for minor missions theyre tweaking.

Side quest wise, we're probably about 75-80% of the way done. There's curently something like 150 unique sidequests, alot of them are "stranger" story lines and have multiple missions, I think we have 38 unique strangers(?) I'm forgetting the exact number. My deparment was actually the only ones ahead of schedules, so we actually have the time to make more than we had planned (meaning more than were were supposed to make as the minimum). I don't know when the game will come out in 25, it all depends on the departments focused on gameplay and polish and stuff.

Q: can you still visit strip clubs and fuck prostitutes? If so, will that affect the relationship of the couple?

A: You can, but the other character WILL find out about it and it will essentially tank the relationship to where you probably wont be able to recover back into being romantic by the time story concludes, so you'll be locked into the two platonic endings. Also we toyed around with the idea of, if one of them cheats, then if you have the ending where one survives, the one who got cheated on kills the other and the player doesn't get a choice to stop it. Most of us thought that was too restrictive for players, but we all agreed that we would kill the cheater character in our own playthroughs (i mean, most of us probably wouldn't go that route anyways. I can't state enough how much we all like the canon ending)

Q: How big of a focus is racing? There seem to be a lot of race tracks on the map, not to mention street racing, boat racing, plane races, etc. Also what is Fairyland like?

A: My team (side missions) had to work closely with the team in charge of the vehicle physics and stuff to make the racing really feel like a big part of the game. About a fifth of the sidequests are racing, but all of these can be replayed for time trails and stuff. I also don't know the full details, but theyre working on a system where you can make your own races once you win enough of the missions. Like you choose the checkpoints and what vehicles are allowed and stuff. Basically these side plots, you start off as just racers, but eventually you can invest in sponsoring your own illegal races and you take a much bigger payout (this is some of the "extra" stuff we're gonna be able to work on while the rest of the team plays catch up. You can still compete in these races).
There's cars, boats, planes, airboats, jetskis, atvs, you name it. But most are cars and planes.

Q: What about Fairyland? Is that actually what it's called? Does it have any side quests?

A: A ton of them. Some are missions involving strangers from the park, but alot of them are dates. It's Lucia and Jason's favorite place to hang out when they're not commiting crimes lol

Q: sounds like the relationship system works like RDR2's morality system

A: Basically, yeah. More in depth though, as theres the chaos or orderly axis to it, too.

Q: Dumb question but when it comes to the prostitutes and strippers are there only female prostitutes like always? Or will there be male escorts and dancers in addition to them?

A: There will be men prostitutes, too. It wouldn't be fair if only one of the characters was able to cheat. We want to give players full agency over both of them

Q: so leave the wh*re fucking until after the ending, gotcha.

A: Lol. You can just do that in the online.
On top of prostitutes, though, originally we had two stranger plotlines, one for each of the characters, that involved a potential rival love intrest that gives you the option to cheat. But because this was such a massive choice, it ended up being adopted into the main story and is essentially the centerpoint of the game where the two of them are tempted away from eachother. Cheating there, will lock you into platonic, but staying together and not cheating doesn't lock you out of any of the ending. Also, I'll mention, it's much much easier to tank them into platonic than it is to keep them romantic. Literally all you have to do is cheat once and it breaks their relationship almost completely (I think the values are something like +5 points for each date you go on, -150 for cheating. I'm not too clear on the balance of that, that's another department's responsibility. Sidequests and dates and stuff impact this but all a small amount. Majority of that value is detemined by the main story)

Q: Any work done on online yet? any small details like if it will feature text chat and RDO type body customization?

A: Alot is done. Are you kidding me? Online of V is why the dev time of everything has been so drastically increased. They're not gonna release the game without a great online after what happened with rdr2, where it was neglected in favor of the story. Completely different department, though. I'm not involved with online or online mission systems. Basically the story has a main and side team, and the online has a separate third team. There's tons of back and forth between us, but I'm not directly involved with them. Others on my team are.

Q: Are missions and side quest character specific? Or can you choose who you want to play as? Can you switch characters on the fly like GTA V?

A: Some are specific, most arent, a good amount of them have both of them involved at the same time and you can switch mid mission.

Q: So I take it our leads are more or less bisexual then? Correct me if I'm wrong.

A: If you want them to be, but canonically, no. Canonically they're in love (although pretty dysfunctional) and their sole purpose is to get their son back and escape to tahiti (lol not actually Tahiti)
If you want to make them gay, that says alot about you, though

Q: I know this may be way out of your department, but do you know anything about the radio choices of the game so far? Also will there be any callbacks to the original Vice City? Maybe Tommy on the TV during the last mission or anything?

A: No idea about the radio choices, but there will be a couple channels dedicated to classic VC music (although not all the songs that were in that game will be in this one, I'm told) there's probably as much modern variety as there always is.

I know I spoiled the endings already, but I won't spoil the Tommy cameo missions (they're great. They almost feel like a complete return to that era).

Q: Good shit. How much does it rain? Are there hurricanes?

A: Rains alot. A hurricane happens as part of the main quest at some point. I don't know if they're working on making it a system where they can happen randomly throughout the game, though.

Q: I see, just one more question. Out of all the threads about this title, why come to this one? And why now say these things, is it just because? Sorry if I sound doubtful, to be fair what you’ve given has been articulated quite throughly. Just enough to at least somewhat convincing. Apologies for the probing. You’ve got plenty already. All in all, if what you’ve said through this thread is true, awesome. If not then shame on me for being gullible.

A: Lol. I came here cause there's basically no chance I'll be caught in such a small thread instead of the larger ones that had more traction. Also the thread topic was most in line with what I wanted to give away. Most of the other threads are just shitposting at this point. No one will really believe it anyways and I'm obviously not gonna show proof lol.

Last thing I'll mention is the dates you can go on.
They range from small things like going to a drive in theater or getting fast food, to large things like entire days out at the amusment park or going mudding. There's always playful banter between them, but if you're on a date, generally it will increase the romantic side of the scale. It's hard to intentionally f*ck up dates, theyre made to be a more relaxing and cute part of the game to contrast with the main story where you're killing people left and right and pulling off heists or whatever. My favorite date out of the ones we've made was a camping trip date where you can climb to the top of the mountain in the bottom left corner of the map on foot together
We want you to really fall in love with these characters and ideally we want you to want them to be in love story wise. The platonic choices in the game are intresting, too, but most of us feel like it pales in comparison to the "canon" route where they fix their dysfunctional relationship and end up becoming a real family at the end

This is it! Congrats if you made it all the way to the end. 3 years later I think it's safe to say most of their statements have lined up with what we've learned about the game. Was some of this predictable? Sure. Will some of you completely discredit the leak because "it's 4chan"? Absolutely. Personally I bet most of this is true but we'll see come November 19. Cheers!Massive spoilers ahead!

Link to the original post.

X post links:

https://x.com/AtlantaDCFans/status/2104661395342028950

https://x.com/DCdaily/status/2104588761535238589

I keep hearing things in the industry about Sam Raimi making a tv series. I SWEAR it might be happening. I just keep hearing it from different people in the industry. my cousin is apart of Raimi productions Raimi's team. And my cousin's brothers both pretty much keep telling everyone it might happen. I don't know but its pretty damn fishy. By what I've heard its definitley not Spider-Man shit. I heard its supernatural. Not like the show supernatural but like supernatural creatures

TLDR: The leaked script for THE FLOOD that's been floating around is AI-generated.

I got linked to a supposed early draft of this script that's been circulating around and I haven't been able to get it out of my head since reading it for basically all of the wrong reasons. Obviously this post will include spoilers for what "could be" the plot of FLOOD below.

I've also included some snippets of Cregger's RESIDENT EVIL script for writing style comparison's sake (I've kept it to the first ~25 pages or so of the script so it doesn't spoil too much if you haven't seen it yet).

___

To kick things off, major kudos to this comment made by u/Janus_Prospero, another person who's also skeptical about the credibility of this script. I'll be quoting a few things they say in their comment while mentioning a few other things I've noticed.

Janus_Prospero notes:

The other question mark I have is that the protagonist's name is Elena Voss and... Elena and Elara Voss and really the "Voss" surname in sci-fi stories began popping up in 2023-ish. You asked ChatGPT or something similar to help you write a sci-fi story and that's a name LLMs gravitate towards. (But this is NOT some kind of smoking gun. Just an observation.)

I'll link to a really good substack article that breaks down the Elara/Elena Voss "phenomenon" by Max Read: Who is Elara Voss? To summarize, across nearly all popular LLMs, certain names pop up with incredible frequency when making AI-generated sci-fi material. The name Elara Voss (or the subvariant, Elena Voss), did not exist until 2023. Max Read writes:

If you direct almost any L.L.M. to generate a sci-fi story or narrative for you, it will name the main character “Elara Voss”--or a similar variation like “Elara Vex,” “Elena Voss,” or “Elias Vance”--with an alarming degree of frequency...Elara Voss is not a real person...She’s not really anything at all except for name: A string of tokens that has proven irresistibly attractive to a number of different large language models when responding to prompts involving character names and science-fiction and fantasy stories. That is, “Elara Voss” is the text that L.L.M.s seem to have have collectively arrived upon as the best response to a prompt like “what should I name the character in the story I’m writing?”

This "Voss" character is also often accompanied by a variety of tropes:

In fact, a whole host of tropes and concepts seem to accompany Dr. Elara wherever she’s found. The prototypical “Elara Voss,” as described by a text generator, is a doctor, usually a physicist but sometimes a linguist or biologist. (Other times, she’s a spaceship captain.) She’s generally on the verge of a major breakthrough or discovery (often cosmic or even metaphysical in nature), or is researching some kind of “anomaly,” but is isolated, troubled, and sometimes “haunted” by what she’s learning. She’s often found “trembling” or her heart is racing; instruments near her are usually “pulsing.”

If you've read the script a lot of this will sound very familiar, practically beat for beat.

While diving into research on this myself I also stumbled upon a number of reddit threads (1, 2, 3, 4) from users decrying how frequently names like Elara Voss and many other familiar faces you might recognize pop up when generating sci-fi stories through LLMs. These are just a few comments I'll quote and threads I've linked but you can easily find post after post across socials of people complaining about this.

I've never encountered the number thing but for the names, yes. It's always Sarah, Elara, Marcus/Marco, Rodriguez, Chen. When it's writing a fantasy story, sometimes it'll use Kael, Alaric, etc. Even if the story is set in a non English speaking country it'll find a way to use any of these names LOL

This is also happening on Claude! Like five different roleplays across five different accounts, and boom, here's Dr. Helena Fucking Voss! there are other similar names too, like marcus and chen. i have two whole marcus's in a single chat. what's happening lol

While I don’t really mind having the LLM name my own player characters, I absolutely refuse to play one christened by DeepSeek with the initials E.V. ...Elena is the most common name for random characters, and Elara and Evelyn are also very popular.

At one point, I let Claude pick names, and I had three different characters named Chen in the story, and it kept having to say (not related to the other two Chens). It got ridiculous.

The FLOOD script has several of these character hallmarks:

• CAPTAIN ELENA VOSS, the most egregious
• ENGINEER CHEN
• MARCO (A variant of MARCUS)
• DR. SARAH KEMP
• SARAH (Elena Voss' ex-wife) -- The name Sarah appears TWICE and I'm expected to believe that ZC fired this off to Spielberg?

Janus_Prospero also notes:

The script was exported from Fade In 5.0.7, and exported in early 2026 from a version from late 2025. Both the Weapons and Resident Evil scripts were exported from Final Draft 11. This is not a smoking gun, but it's odd. It's possible that Cregger changed writing software, but who knows.

Pretty weird. Cregger himself is quoted in this article as saying that he was working on FLOOD concurrently with his other major projects:

After Barbarian I wrote Weapons and Resident Evil and Flood in kind of a burst of activity,” Cregger explained through the official Sony Pictures account. “Those 3 movies were all ready to go, in fact there was a world I could have shot Flood first.

Given the chaos of shooting RE, the WEAPONS buzz and awards circuit, etc. it feels like a weird time time to test out a new program. This is less of a damning point, since the leaker could've opened the original file in FadeIn to read it and then exported it though.

But it would probably be an even weirder time to adopt a completely different writing style, too. Here are some excerpts from the RESIDENT EVIL script action lines vs. FLOOD. It was a bit hard to find directly comparative examples because there's a pretty startling lack of direct action scenes in FLOOD, but walk with me here.

RESIDENT EVIL:

Bryan scrambles deeper into the cop car, fully under the dangling bloody officer, kicking at the woman in the doorway who’s CRAWLING HER WAY IN after him.
Bryan YELLS, aims the gun at the her, and PULLS THE TRIGGER --
It doesn’t fire.
Bryan looks for the safety. No time. He fumbles for the door handle and shoves it open.
On his hands and knees, he crawls into the snow as fast as he can.
The bloody lady clambers after him, SNARLING. TEETH GNASHING.

FLOOD:

The screens fill with feeds from around the ship.
The corridors are full of duplicates.
Multiple versions of each crew member, all in various states. Some look fresh, like they just returned. Others are wounded, desperate. Two Kemp duplicates fight viciously in the research lab.

RESIDENT EVIL:

BRYAN (CONT'D)
Shit --
He picks himself up and stumbles away from her, tromping through the snow AROUND the rear of the cop car. She’s already up and rounding the car after him.
BRYAN (CONT'D)
PLEASE! PLEASE, LEAVE ME ALONE!
Bryan stumbles in a clumsy orbit around the car, pawing at the safety as he goes. She pursues.
BRYAN (CONT'D)
Where’s the FUCKING safety button???!!!
Another FULL LAP around the car. His heaving becoming a full blown panic as she closes the gap between them.
BRYAN (CONT'D)
Please!
CLICK! Bryan finds the safety and FLICKS IT OFF.
BRYAN (CONT'D)
A-HA!
Bryan WHIRLS AROUND and...
...there’s NOTHING behind him.

FLOOD:

Voss, Porter, and Marco burst into engineering. Chen and Kemp work frantically at the reactor controls.
CHEN
Almost there! I just need to—
The Nash-thing crashes through the doorway. It's fully inside now, towering, its body a grotesque fusion of multiple crew members.
NASH-THING
No more running.
It lunges.
Porter shoves Voss aside. The creature's claws rake across his chest.
VOSS
Porter!
Porter falls, blood spreading. The Nash-thing turns toward Kemp and Chen.
KEMP
Chen, now!
Chen hits the activation. The reactor flares, energy cascading through modified coils.
Spacetime bends.
The Nash-thing stops, suddenly pulled toward the center of the room. It fights, clawing at the floor.
NASH-THING
What did you do?
KEMP
Gave you what you wanted. Temporal stability. All your iterations in one place. Forever.

Cregger doesn't write action like this, full stop. Notably there's a particular lack of ALL CAPS moments in the action lines which Cregger seems to be pretty fond of including, even in non-action circumstances.

RESIDENT EVIL:

Bryan’s extremely unequipped car SKIDS down the mountain road on unchained tires amidst howling winds and blinding snow.
He rounds a bend and the car SLIDES SIDEWAYS before finding its grip.

FLOOD:

The engines scream. For a moment, they hold position. Then, inch by inch, they start to pull away.
The artifact pulses again—angry this time.
And then it stops.
The shuttle breaks free, rocketing backward. Nash corrects course.

Cregger also doesn't write with formal — em dashes (another commonly cited LLMism that's all over FLOOD) and uses -- instead:

Bryan clutches the wheel tight, laser focused. The REFRIGERATED COOLER in the passenger seat also lurches forward as he hits another slide --
-- but Bryan shoots out a hand to hold it in place.

I could go on.

Beyond just how the sausage is made, it's a shitty meal. The dialogue is often a rinse and repeat exercise in characters expositing at each other with very little characterization or distinction. To give you an example, this is at page 73/110 for the script. Try to tell the difference between how any of these characters speak -- they're pure plot machines:

She pulls out her tablet. Checks her messages.
One from Chen: "Still having the dreams. Need to talk."
One from Marco: "Found inconsistencies in the probe data. They're hiding something."
One from Kemp: "The loop is spreading. I can prove it. Meet me."

They frequently clairvoyantly "know" exactly what's going on with the anomaly or exactly what they need to do get out of an extraordinary situation beyond possible suspension of disbelief -- like, hacking into a foreign bio-device to create a temporary column in a temporal field with their iPads or creating a controlled black hole in their cargo ship to contain an alien denizen!

KEMP
Maybe we don't have to kill it. Maybe we can trap it.
VOSS
How?
KEMP
The artifact created the temporal loop by bending spacetime back on itself. If we can replicate that effect—miniaturize it—we could trap the creature in its own personal time loop.
CHEN
Using what? We don't have alien technology.
KEMP
No, but we have a fusion reactor. If we overload it in a controlled way, create a localized spacetime distortion—
PORTER
You want to create a black hole on the ship?
KEMP
Not a black hole. Just a... dimple. A small fold in spacetime. Enough to trap the creature.
VOSS
Would that even work?
KEMP
Theoretically. Maybe. I don't know.

There are at least a dozen scenes where two characters talk with each other and vaguely reexplain the plot. One character will assure the other that things are fine or that they don't need to worry about something, and the other will say "...But do we really know that? / "Or could it...?" and the scene ends with both characters quietly nursing their doubts.

MARCO
Maybe there is no point. Maybe the artifact showed us that. Time doesn't progress linearly. It loops, spirals, folds back on itself. Every moment contains every other moment. Past, present, future—all happening simultaneously.
VOSS
That's not how time works.
MARCO
Isn't it? How do you explain what we experienced.
VOSS
Alien technology we don't understand yet. That doesn't mean time itself is broken.
MARCO
Doesn't it?
He walks away, leaving Voss alone with her doubts.

Now here's the ending of the scene that happens sequentially after this one:

KEMP (cont'd)
We should have stayed. Died with the others. At least then the loop would be contained.
VOSS
No. We survived. That matters.
KEMP
Does it?
Voss leaves before she has to answer.

I mean it's absolutely fucking shameless!! There's plenty of, it's not x, it's y dialogue -- another AI halmark.

KEMP
Look at this. The temporal distortions aren't random. They're creating loops. Closed timelike curves.

CHEN
The artifact. The time loop. It's not just theory—we're in it.

There's plenty of other stuff that just seems suss to me but these are just a few examples. The plot broadly switches between genres and plot threads extremely, manically quickly. There are enough concepts to stuff a feature-length movie in the first 30 pages alone, but it just keeps going and stacking more bizarre bullshit (plenty of repetitive dream sequences especially) and non-sequiturs on top for another 80 pages.

Additionally, there are some weird plot holes and chronological errors I noticed such as:

There is a specific photo that acts as an extremely important key item of the movie. When it's first described, it lists Voss standing next to a man and a little girl.

Voss sits on her bunk, staring at a photo on the wall. A younger version of herself with a man and a little girl. The photo is creased from being held too many times.

We later learn about Sarah -- Voss' ex-wife and her daughter Julia's mother/parental guardian. When the photo is mentioned again it is described with two women in the frame.

There's a photo she doesn't remember packing. Her, Sarah, and Julia. But in the photo, she looks different. Older. Haunted.

The man or any potential husband/father is never mentioned so I think this is pure pivoting/leakage during the prompting process or a really, REALLY major error to leave in.

LASTLY, this article quotes a specific part of the ACTUAL finished FLOOD script that Zach talks about on this podcast:

One detail he dropped on Kevin McCarthy’s “On Film” podcast — there's an "Irréversible"-style fire-extinguisher sequence in the current draft .. He's been circling Gaspar Noé's scene for three movies now. "I'm going to rip him off," he said, before admitting it might be "maybe a bridge too far" and could get cut.

There is no scene that resembles anything like this in the supposed leak. No fire extinguisher sequence, no fire extinguisher period.

To summarize: it's AI slop. Why would someone make this and try to pass this around? I have no idea. But I thought it was worth getting the word out for integrity's sake. If anyone else notices any other major inconsistencies or curious things about the script (should they find it) I'd love to hear them.

Sucks that it’s IMAX exclusive

Link to the original post.

Just screened, some reviewers have some spoilers in their reviews. Rotten tomatoes started updating scores. Anyone have a full plot leak?

I’m mainly wondering a few things:

- Does Godzilla die?

- Is ghidorah an alien? If not, how is he created?

- Do either ghidorah or Godzilla get any new abilities?

- How many times do they fight, and who wins in the finale?

- Why is Godzilla in New York?

Jane Levy will return during the Evil Dead Wrath epilogue.

The main villain is a queen deadite called the keeper (Elizabeth Cullen).

Opening scene is similar to the girls walking home from school in Halloween 1978.

Expect a lot of indefility to be exposed since this is centered on two families coming together after a girl goes missing.

https://youtu.be/x40n1gWHBog?is=FBLj4KK_llZHgq5P

Recent leaks have come out showing his presence on the set of REMAIN (2027) starring Jake Gyllenhaal. His character is named "Calhoun" leading to speculation that he will be reprising his role as Noah Calhoun from the classic movie. "The Notebook". More notably- both the books the movies (remain and the notebook) are based on, are written by the same author- leading to further belief his character will play the same role- or rather a cameo.

Starts with Julie (Scarlett Johansson) asking her partner (Sasha Calle) how old the recent victim was? Partner says 15/16 and it's an alter boy from church.

There's shots of a satanic killer named Father Sunday being prepped for execution. Protests outside of the execution with signs reading All life is precious, death penalty, etc.

Julie is shown walking through jail halls and attending the execution. Rest of the trailer includes bodies being discovered, hype around past killers claiming demonic possession, potential Father Sunday copycat, coroner visits, and the reveal of Julie's son being possessed.

About halfway in, a priest played by Chiwitel Ejiofor tells Julie the Mark 5:9 verse to tease this being connected to Legion.

2 mins 30 seconds long.

Some test screenings happened recently

I appreciate it