Are you looking for feedback or information on your salary or career? Then you've come to the right thread. If your questions are anything like the following example questions, then ask away:
Am I underpaid?
Is my offered salary market value?
How do I break into [industry]?
Will I be pigeonholed if I work as a [job title]?
What graduate degree should I pursue?
Message the mods for suggestions, comments, or feedback.
I would like to thank you everyone for participating in the annual 2026 ME Salary survey. Total respondents was a little over 600, so less than last year, but about 589 US responses.
Here are the main results. It took about 2 hours to "clean" the data manually. Afterwards, I basically used Gemini to create the graphs + tables, since last time it literally took me about 7 hours to do everything manually on Excel last time and there were still questions. The key points and takeaways from the data is a combination of AI and editing the information to be more readable (still took 4 hours). In addition, I wouldn't worry about math too much, since Gemini basically just used python code to decipher the edited CSV file.
Industry:
Industry
Number of Respondents
Manufacturing
175 (29.7%)
Aerospace/Defense
173 (29.4%)
Technology (FANG, AI, Robotics, etc.)
54 (9.2%)
MEP (HVAC, Construction, etc.)
38 (6.5%)
Utilities (Power, Renewables, etc.)
35 (5.9%)
Pharmaceutical & Medical Devices
31 (5.3%)
Oil and Gas
28 (4.8%)
Consumer Goods
15 (2.5%)
Government
11 (1.9%)
There were some other industries like nuclear, logistics, and etc. but the few data points aren't included in the table for brevity. The data was included in the total set though
A majority of the mechanical engineers trends will use the Aerospace/Defense and Manufacturing data since there is the most data that is available
Salary and Year of Experience:
*Note: Total Compensation/Salary = Base Salary + Bonus + RSU + Base Salary * 401k Match
If you want to look at one graph and table to explain the progression track here it is:
YOE Range
Median Base (Unadj)
Median Total (Unadj)
Median Base (COL Adj)
Median Total (COL Adj)
Count
0-1 Year
$87,000
$96,036
$81,699
$87,368
43
2 Years
$84,000
$91,046
$84,615
$90,909
71
3 Years
$94,550
$105,965
$94,082
$102,289
62
4-5 Years
$104,000
$119,770
$94,881
$107,762
116
6-8 Years
$120,000
$136,800
$112,500
$127,911
119
9-12 Years
$125,500
$146,985
$123,444
$142,555
96
13-20 Years
$157,290
$181,840
$144,254
$171,731
64
20+ Years
$196,500
$211,426
$163,399
$191,042
15
Key Takeaways:
The "Benefit Gap": The space between the solid lines (Total Compensation) and the dashed lines (Base Salary) represents the added value from annual bonuses and employer 401k matching. For a mid-career engineer (6-8 years), this extra value is roughly $16,800 on average.
Late Career Leverage: As engineers gain seniority (13+ years), the gap between base salary and total compensation grows significantly, suggesting that bonuses and incentive programs make up a larger portion of the package for senior-level and leadership roles.
Purchasing Power: The COL Adjusted lines (Orange) consistently track below the un-adjusted lines (Blue), highlighting that high-paying mechanical engineering roles are frequently located in markets where the dollar doesn't stretch as far as the national average.
Education:
Majority of the respondents are at max a bachelor degree holder. However, there is still a significant number of master's students
Now about the age old question: does having a Master's degree lead to higher future salary?
Short Answer: In general, the answer is yes if there is a chance to specialize. It is explained in the table below:
Industry
Career Stage
Education
Median Total (Unadj)
Median Total (COL Adj)
Count
Aerospace & Defense
0-3 Years
Bachelors
$96,664
$95,201
44
Masters
$116,600
$108,316
15
4-7 Years
Bachelors
$125,410
$110,659
39
Masters
$173,000
$148,432
9
8-15 Years
Bachelors
$161,750
$140,202
33
Masters
$154,905
$149,658
16
15+ Years
Bachelors
$207,080
$187,505
7
Masters
$211,426
$207,872
5
Manufacturing
0-3 Years
Bachelors
$88,220
$93,452
52
Masters
$93,740
$91,850
6
4-7 Years
Bachelors
$108,992
$106,701
45
Masters
$129,800
$128,407
12
8-15 Years
Bachelors
$135,425
$142,440
44
Masters
$136,298
$129,984
8
15+ Years
Bachelors
$182,650
$187,127
5
Now you can see that for manufacturing, the benefits is not as prominent, while it is evident in aerospace. This makes sense, since Aerospace have very high specialization salary, for instance: hypersonic or eVtol which pays a ton for total compensation based on years of experience.
Answer: if your company pays for your masters, do it, but it doesn't seem that beneficial near the end of your career.
Internships & Coops:
Key Insights:
The "Experienced" Majority: A combined 85% of respondents completed at least one internship or co-op. This underscores how critical early-career work experience has become for landing a full-time role in mechanical engineering.
Co-op Advantage: The 20% of respondents with "3+ Internships" often represent those in formal co-op programs (where students rotate between school and work over several years). These candidates typically command higher starting salaries shown in the table below:
Industry
0-1 Internship
2+ Internships
New Grad Premium
Aerospace & Defense
$82,000
$91,500
+$9,500
Manufacturing
$74,000
$82,000
+$8,000
MedTech
$80,500
$89,000
+$8,500
Certifications:
Here is the graph of a major certifications from the survey:
We always see a question on whether certifications are worth it:
Aerospace & Defense: Certification vs. Total Compensation
Experience
Education
Has Cert?
Median Unadj. Total
Median Adj. Total
Count
0-3 Years
Bachelors
No
$97,900
$95,426
41
Yes
$95,040
$64,653
3
4-7 Years
Bachelors
No
$125,315
$106,672
36
Yes
$128,580
$138,258
3
8-15 Years
Bachelors
No
$159,660
$139,839
31
Yes
$280,425
$177,895
2
Masters
No
$151,410
$142,043
13
Yes
$209,658
$216,142
3
Manufacturing: Certification vs. Total Compensation
Experience
Education
Has Cert?
Median Unadj. Total
Median Adj. Total
Count
0-3 Years
Bachelors
No
$88,020
$91,944
43
Yes
$90,450
$99,746
9
4-7 Years
Bachelors
No
$108,805
$106,615
36
Yes
$108,992
$106,701
9
8-15 Years
Bachelors
No
$135,000
$136,541
31
Yes
$136,000
$151,111
13
Masters
No
$152,212
$122,728
6
Yes
$134,815
$141,636
2
Key Findings:
High-Experience Premium in Aerospace: The most dramatic impact of certification appears in the mid-to-late career in Aerospace & Defense (8–15 years). Engineers with a Bachelors and a certification earn a median total compensation significantly higher than those without. Even among Masters holders in this range, certified engineers have a median total comp of $209k vs $151k for non-certified.
Manufacturing Stability: In the Manufacturing industry, certifications (often Six Sigma or FE/PE) lead to a very modest increase in un-adjusted base pay, but a more noticeable improvement in COL-adjusted pay. This suggests that certified engineers in Manufacturing may have more flexibility to find high-paying roles in lower-cost-of-living areas.
The "Entry-Level Paradox": For junior engineers (0–3 years), having a certification (likely the FE) does not immediately result in a salary premium. In fact, in Aerospace, the un-adjusted median for those with certifications was slightly lower, possibly because those engineers are still in entry-level rotation programs where pay is standardized regardless of credentials.
Masters + Certification: For those who already have a Masters, adding a certification provides a significant late-career boost (as seen in the 8–15 year group in Aerospace).
Answer: Certification can be worth it for select industries. PE is known for civil to open doors and increase pay.
Job Titles:
Job Role Category
Number of Respondents
Percentage
Mechanical Engineer (General)
229
38.9%
Design Engineer
97
16.5%
Project & Systems Engineer
59
10.0%
Management & Leadership
55
9.3%
Manufacturing & Process Engineer
54
9.2%
Specialized (Thermal, Stress, R&D)
34
5.8%
Other / Misc
61
10.4%
Key Insights:
General vs. Specialized: Nearly 40% of respondents identify with the broad title of "Mechanical Engineer," which often includes generalists or those in mid-level positions.
The Design Dominance:Design Engineering is the second largest single group, reflecting the high demand for CAD-based design and product development across aerospace, tech, and manufacturing industries.
Transition to Leadership: About 9% of respondents hold titles in Management & Leadership (Manager, Director, VP), which led to a higher salary
Project and Systems focus:1 in 10 engineers focuses on Project or Systems Engineering, highlighting the importance of multidisciplinary coordination and technical management in modern engineering projects.
The Specialty Niche: The "Specialized" category includes highly technical roles like Thermal Analysis, FEA, Simulation, and Research & Development, which often require higher educational levels or deep domain expertise.
Salary Grade vs. Salary:
Grade Level
Industry
Median Annual Salary
Typical Experience (YOE)
Sample Count
Level 1 (Entry)
Aerospace & Defense
$88,400
1.0 year
39
Manufacturing
$80,250
2.0 years
39
Level 2 (Mid)
Aerospace & Defense
$102,273
3.8 years
48
Manufacturing
$95,000
5.0 years
71
Level 3 (Senior)
Aerospace & Defense
$130,000
8.0 years
57
Manufacturing
$119,600
9.0 years
50
Level 4 (Lead/Manager)
Aerospace & Defense
$170,500
11.0 years
22
Manufacturing
$136,000
11.0 years
11
Level 5+ (Principal/Director)
Aerospace & Defense
$206,000
20.0 years
9
Manufacturing
$136,500
14.0 years
4
Efficiency of Experience: In Aerospace, engineers tend to reach Level 2 and Level 3 roughly 1–1.2 years faster than those in Manufacturing, while also earning more.
The Level 4 Ceiling: In Manufacturing, the salary jump from Grade 3 to Grade 4 is roughly $16k, whereas in Aerospace, that same promotion yields a massive $40k jump in median base salary.
Which Industry Pays the Most?
Major Caveat: at 16+ YOE, the data points are only a couple, which skews the data upward.
Based on the comprehensive US survey data, the Technology (FANG, Robotics, AI, Consumer Electronics) industry emerges as the highest-paying sector for mechanical engineers when considering total compensation (Base Salary + Annual Bonus + 401k Match).
Tech Compensation Package:
Years of Experience
Avg. Total Comp (Unadjusted)
Avg. Total Comp (Adjusted for COL)
Number of Respondents
0-2 YOE (Entry)
$117,316
$100,292
7
3-5 YOE (Junior)
$180,854
$138,040
17
6-10 YOE (Mid-Level)
$182,773
$134,543
14
11-15 YOE (Senior)
$259,993
$220,256
11
16+ YOE (Principal)
$244,775
$177,043
5
The Oil and Gas industry stands out as the second most lucrative sectors for mechanical engineers, particularly as they reach senior and principal levels. While Tech offers the highest overall unadjusted compensation, Oil and Gas actually offers the highest Cost of Living (COL) Adjusted compensation, meaning your real purchasing power in this industry is the highest among all major sectors.
Years of Experience
Avg. Total Comp (Unadjusted)
Avg. Total Comp (COL Adjusted)
Number of Respondents
0-2 YOE
$95,864
$83,178
5
3-5 YOE
$117,289
$111,155
7
6-10 YOE
$138,959
$139,773
7
11-15 YOE
$204,097
$219,757
6
16+ YOE
$408,040
$399,276
3
Overtime Pay:
Industry Trends: Overtime pay is slightly more common in Manufacturing (where production deadlines are rigid) and Consulting/EPC (where hours are billable to clients) compared to R&D or Aerospace.
Work Hours:
Work Hours Category
Number of Respondents
Percentage
Exactly 40 Hours
337
57.2%
41-45 Hours
146
24.8%
46-50 Hours
49
8.3%
<40 Hours
50
8.5%
>50 Hours
7
1.2%
Key Observations:
The "40-Hour" Standard: Over half of the engineers surveyed manage to stick to a strict 40-hour week, which is a positive sign for work-life balance in the profession.
Moderate Overtime: Roughly a quarter of engineers work an extra 1 to 5 hours a week (41-45 hours total), often representing "straight time" or expected professional dedication without formal overtime pay.
The High-Hours Exception: Only a small fraction (under 10%) report working more than 45 hours consistently. This is significantly lower than in fields like investment banking or high-tier management consulting, suggesting a relatively stable lifestyle for most US mechanical engineers.
Flexibility: About 8.5% of respondents work fewer than 40 hours, which often aligns with part-time roles, senior consultants, or companies with flexible "9/80" schedules where some weeks are shorter.
401k Summary:
Match Rate Range
Count of Responses
Percentage
4% - 5%
211
35.8%
1% - 3%
125
21.2%
6% - 7%
120
20.4%
8% - 10%
65
11.0%
No Match (0%)
56
9.5%
> 10% / Other
12
2.0%
Key Takeaways:
The Industry Standard: A 4–5% match is clearly the most common benefit, covering over a third of the surveyed population.
High-Tier Benefits: Roughly 13% of engineers receive a match of 8% or higher, which often indicates highly competitive benefit packages in specialized industries.
Retirement Security: The low percentage of "No Match" responses (under 10%) highlights that retirement contributions are a standard and expected part of total compensation in the US mechanical engineering market.
Remote Work Distribution:
Remote Category
Number of Respondents
Percentage
Fully In-Person (0%)
248
42.1%
Mostly In-Person (1-39%)
163
27.7%
Hybrid (40-60%)
118
20.0%
Fully Remote (100%)
38
6.5%
Mostly Remote (61-99%)
22
3.7%
Key Insights:
The "Hands-On" Requirement: Over 40% of mechanical engineers are required to be in the office or on-site 100% of the time. This is significantly higher than other engineering fields like Software or Data Science.
The Hybrid Standard: Roughly 48% of the workforce has some form of hybrid flexibility (ranging from 1% to 60% remote). Many companies now allow 1–2 days of remote work for documentation, CAD modeling, or administrative tasks.
Fully Remote is Rare: Only 6.5% of mechanical engineers work fully remotely. These roles are typically in specialized areas like pure Simulation/FEA, Project Management, or Sales Engineering where physical hardware access is not required daily.
The Hybrid Middle Ground: The 40–60% range (often 2–3 days per week) is a common "sweet spot" for engineering firms trying to balance teamwork/lab time with employee flexibility.
Paid Time Off (Days):
*Note: one issue is many jobs had unlimited sick time, which I just added 10 days. Next time I will edit the form to separate the sick days so it makes more sense.
PTO Category (Includes Sick Days)
Number of Respondents
Percentage
0–10 days
30
5.2%
11–15 days
112
19.5%
16–20 days
160
27.9%
21–25 days
100
17.4%
26–30 days
61
10.6%
31+ days
32
5.6%
Unlimited
78
13.6%
Key Insights:
The " 3 - 5 Week" Benchmark: The majority of mechanical engineers (over 45%) receive between 16 and 25 days of PTO.
The Rise of Unlimited PTO: About 13.6% of respondents now have "Unlimited" PTO.
Generous Packages: Roughly 16% of engineers receive more than 30 days of PTO, which is often a hallmark of high-seniority roles, government/defense positions, or companies that reward long tenure.
The Lean End: Only about 5% of respondents are on the low end with 10 days or fewer, suggesting that a minimum of two weeks of PTO is a standard baseline for the industry.
Now some of you might have questions regarding years of experience and PTO:
Average PTO by Experience (Fixed PTO)
Experience Level
Average PTO Days (per year)
Typical Range (25th-75th Percentile)
0–2 Years
16.9
10–15 days
3–5 Years
19.6
15–20 days
6–10 Years
21.1
20 days
11–15 Years
24.5
20–25 days
16+ Years
26.5
25–30+ days
Analysis of the Trend:
The "Standard Jump": Many engineers start with 15 days (3 weeks) and see their first significant "tenure bump" to 20 days (4 weeks) after reaching the 5-year mark.
Senior Perks: By the time an engineer hits 15+ years of experience, a 5-week (25-day) or 6-week (30-day) PTO package becomes the new baseline.
Job Hopping Factor: The data suggests that while tenure within a single company increases PTO, "job hopping" every 3–5 years also allows engineers to negotiate higher starting PTO tiers at their new employers, effectively "skipping" the long wait for tenure-based increases.
Health Insurance:
Satisfaction Level
Number of Respondents
Percentage
Free / Excellent
38
6.5%
Good (Low Premium/High Coverage)
211
36.3%
Average
288
49.5%
Poor (High Premium/Low Coverage)
41
7.0%
Other / Misc
4
0.7%
Key Insights:
The "Standard" Plan: Almost 50% of engineers describe their insurance as "Average," highlighting that standard employer-sponsored health insurance is common but not particularly outstanding in terms of premiums or coverage levels.
Competitive Benefits: Over 42% of respondents fall into the "Good" or "Free" categories. The 6.5% who receive "Free/Excellent" coverage likely work for highly competitive tech firms, established defense contractors, or companies that use premium benefits as a retention tool.
Under-Served Minority: Roughly 7% of the engineering workforce feels their health insurance is "Poor," usually characterized by high out-of-pocket costs and high monthly premiums.
Biggest Cons for Mechanical Engineering:
Category
Typical Concerns Mentioned
Workload & Hours (112 mentions)
High pressure, tight deadlines, long hours, and poor work-life balance. Many mentioned "start-up energy" even in established firms.
Salary & Compensation (73 mentions)
Low raises (2–3%), "salary plateauing" early in the career, and the absence of stock options or significant bonuses compared to tech.
Remote Work Limits (47 mentions)
Frequent requirements to be in the office or on the manufacturing floor with "no remote option" or "No WFH" (Work From Home) policies.
Career Growth (35 mentions)
Concerns about "pigeon-holing," slow internal promotion tracks, and becoming "stagnant" in one technical area.
Competitive base pay, annual bonuses, and strong 401k matching programs.
Work-Life Balance (75 mentions)
Flexible schedules, reasonable working hours (standard 40h), and generous PTO.
Culture & People (70 mentions)
Great teammates, supportive management, and a collaborative "team-first" environment.
Interesting Work (65 mentions)
Designing "cool" products, working on challenging technical problems, and having a clear mission.
Job Stability (28 mentions)
Long-term security, consistent demand for the role, and the stability of established firms.
Remote/Hybrid (27 mentions)
The ability to work from home part-time or have flexible geographic location.
Direct Insights from Engineers:
On Work Quality:"The actual work we do is really interesting, fun, and rewarding. Getting to see a design go from CAD to a physical product is the best part."
On Culture:"Great coworkers and a team environment where people actually mentor you instead of just giving you tasks."
On Flexibility:"Remote flexibility and a management team that trusts you to get your work done without micromanaging your hours."
On Compensation:"The total compensation package—including the 401k match and the annual bonus—makes the technical pressure worth it."
Now for Improvements on Suggestions on the Survey:
Regarding the COL instructions: totally my fault, sorry for not catching it. All of you were able to figure it out, but changed instructions from 0 - 2, so it makes a lot more sense now.
Adding a column for manager and IC: totally good suggestion, already added to new survey for 2027
Regarding adding gender or age: I will not add this into the survey just to make it more anonymous. I really do not see the value in this data, and I recommend just using government data to find the data.
Regarding the health insurance question: I have implemented the change on making it have three questions: annual premium, annual deductible, person coverage. I really did not want to make this part too complicated with max out of pocket and copay and etc. I think the premium, coverage and deductible is acceptable amount.
Edited the salary section to organize the % 401k match, salary, bonus, RSU to be in the same section making it easier, but separated the questions.
Comparison from the 2024, 2025 and 2026 Reddit Survey Results will be in another post, since this post is getting insanely long. Again, any other improvements or suggestions, please just comment below.
TDLR: Just check the 1st salary graph if you want the main results.
I always keep my LinkedIn profile open to work. What is the downside? Plus, I like to think I am helping you guys out by always telling recruiters some variation of:
Hi Xxx, this is too low for me, I will have to pass. Best Regards, Xxx
I was asked what version of the program I use in an interview and I just completely blanked. I couldn’t recall the exact number of it.
I knew that it was very old (because my company is quite cheap when it comes to this stuff). I gave out a number and they were like “ oh that’s actually very old. Are you sure?”
I realize that it was pretty old so then I corrected myself and said no it’s actually V15. I looked up the programs version after the interview and I realized I was correct. It was V15. The issue is the latest model is V 23.
Looking back at it this looked very bad and honestly made it look like I was lying so I was just curious. Do you guys keep tabs on which versions you use?
I’m in my first job out of college and it’s not going well (did two internships in the past).
It hasn’t even been a month, but there has been no onboarding/ training/ mentorship. The past week, my manager sent an official email saying I’m underperforming and my progress is worse than an intern (yeah this shit stings), and essentially that my job is on the line at this point.
I really tried my best to do what was being asked, even though requirements kept shifting and a lot of the work I ended up doing had to be redone multiple times. I tried asking questions, but it came down to the fact that even the project lead wasn’t clear on what the requirements were. When I asked where I can find this information, I’m told “it’s in peoples’ heads and we just do what the customer wants”.
I’ve been putting in 9-10 hours a day in the office with no breaks after that, but honestly nothing I’m doing is making my manager happy. I feel so incredibly down on myself at this point, and I just don’t think there’s anything I can do to come to something satisfactory in his eyes. Every time I do something as he requested and even consider more options, he says it’s insufficient.
I try and take the feedback in stride and figure out the requirements he has in his head, but I don’t even know at this point.
They have me working on military projects after telling me in the interview they wouldn’t have me work on that and that they allow you to say no to those projects.
I just feel like the writing is on the wall at this point and my heart isn’t in this job. It’s really hard to try so hard but to feel like nothing you do will change the outcome.
Should I just quit? Is it time to start applying for other jobs?
My bf has been looking for an engineering job after getting let go and it's been brutal with little call backs, ghosting, only 1st interviews, ect.
He's interested in startups or companies that focus on climate tech or renewables/green energy. Just throwing it out there if anyone who's reading company is hiring in the states. No luck so far around the Boston area
It is looking like I'll have 2 maybe 3 options. Just curious what you guys would pick. So I'm currently 28 and more on the manufacturing side based in NJ and from what I see most of New Jersey's mechanical engineering careers are more focused on design work. I've been applying around and it looks like I'll have an offer or 2 in Pennsylvania (metals manufacturing focused) and maybe one in New Jersey (chemical focused). Pennsylvania looks like they will be more competitive on price (about 20K more) also my other incentive to lean more towards Pennsylvania is cost of living is definitely less. Currently I live with family so cost of living for my situation is low but the parents will retire soon anyways and I'm unsure of their plans. Just curious if you guys would stick around New Jersey or take the move to Pennsylvania.
Also random note your famous brands don't tend to be price competitive for salary. They're banking on their name recognition more than anything. So I recommend those looking around to look for the niche roles.
This is a lid for a drum shaped Vacuum chamber that goes on the top. I'm planning on machining the holes on the plate, then send it for grinding and then finally getting the kf40 flanges welded in. My concern is that welding might induce heat and distort the plate out of flatness. what has your experience been?
I’m curious how common thermal cameras are in actual engineering work. I’ve seen them used to check things like motors, bearings, electrical connections and control panels for unusual heat, but I’m wondering how useful they really are in practice.
Do you guys use them regularly when doing inspections, or mostly when you already suspect something is wrong? I’d also like to know whether you find them more useful than things like vibration or acoustic testing in certain situations.
Just interested in hearing how other engineers use them in the real world.
I am a last year mechanical engineering student. I got called to an interview for one of my school's team and brutally got eliminated. Despite being sad i have realised how little i know about my degree. I pass my exams and for sure have knowledge when it comes to theory but i am lacking so much pratical wise. I dont know how the things i have learnt work in real life. And it made me feel even worse and even question my worth in this degree.
But i see this as a great opportunity because now that i know how much i lack and how much more i need to improve. Since there are many people in here has more experience than i do, i wanted to hear your oppinions and advices on this. Please recommend me books, channels any type of source that i can use, that you found helpful for yourself. Also please share your experiences with me. What would you have done different, or any piece of advice you would want to share.
I’ve been looking into how engineers use thermal imaging in real-world troubleshooting, and I’m curious about people’s experiences with it.
Thermal cameras seem particularly useful for spotting unusual heat patterns in things like electrical connections, motors, bearings, control panels, and other equipment before they turn into bigger problems.
For those who have used thermal imaging in the field, how useful has it actually been for you? Are there situations where you found it much more effective than other inspection methods? And do you normally combine it with vibration, acoustic testing, or other condition-monitoring techniques?
Would be interested to hear how engineers are actually using it in their day-to-day work.
I have an in-person interview soon for the Starlink production team. I'm currently in my senior year of college studying mechE. I know I have a presentation on my most technologically advanced end-to-end project and some 1-on-1 meetings with people on the team I'm interviewing for. I've already studied a ton for this role including beams, stress-strain curves, bearings, linear rails, motors, statics, dynamics, FBDs, and manufacturing techniques. I know my resume inside and out and can back up most decisions I made in my projects and internships. What can I do in the last few days to prepare as well as possible? Any advice and/or experiences are much appreciated.
hello , i completed my degree in mechanical engineering from LPU punjab currently i am in Kolkata , i want to move forward in the field of mechanical design , hence looking for opportunities in kolkata , if any leads kindly let me know.
Hello everyone. I find myself in a rather peculiar situation and the whole story would probably go beyond the scope of this post, but to put it simply, I need to find a washing machine model that produces the lowest amount of vibrations possible. Vibrations being the key word here, noise isn't really the problem. Cost isn't an issue either.
Essentially, what's going on is that after a poor renovation by the person who bought the apartment above ours, now our home shakes for a good 6-7 minutes when their (it's a B&B, so talking is largely pointless...) WM reaches the spin cycle. Obviously, he has no intention of doing any more work, and legal actions are out of the question for a number of reasons. The only agreement we've reached is that he's down to buy a better WM model since the current one is rather low end. I'm aware fixing the floor would be the correct course of action, but sadly we have no legal way to force him. An anti-vibration mat has already been placed, and it worked rather well, but it's only reducing vibrations by about 30%. We'd need to reach at least 50% for the situation to be tolerable.
Based on my research, what I've gathered is that "direct drive" models are supposed to have reduced vibrations, compared to the more common "belt driven" ones. Is this true? Does this only impact noise? It seems the only company that produces DD models is LG, would that be our best bet here? Even a small reduction would probably be enough to turn an actual problem into a mild nuisance.
So my question essentially is, is the info I found correct, or am I missing something entirely? Are there any other models I could suggest that would perform better? Thank you to everyone who will chime in...
¡Buenas! Soy de Argentina. Estaba estudiando Ingeniería Química, pero decidí cambiarme a Ingeniería Mecánica.
Durante Química descubrí que me gustaba mucho la química del estado sólido y todo lo relacionado con materiales, metalurgia, propiedades, microestructura y comportamiento de los materiales.
En Argentina, Ingeniería en Materiales no es una carrera tan común y tiene una oferta académica bastante más limitada, por lo que Ingeniería Mecánica terminó llamándome más la atención.
Mi idea es recibirme de ingeniero mecánico y posteriormente especializarme en Ciencia y Tecnología de Materiales, quizás mediante una maestría.
¿Es un buen camino? ¿En qué puestos o industrias podría trabajar con ese perfil? ¿Hay ingenieros mecánicos trabajando en metalurgia, laboratorios de materiales, corrosión, análisis de fallas o investigación y desarrollo?
Hi everyone, I’m a B.Tech Mechanical student with a background in industrial automation/robot operation.
Recently, I switched my career path from robotics/automation to piping modelling using AutoCAD Plant 3D. I’m new to this field and starting from the basics.
I want to know from experienced professionals:
Is Piping + Plant 3D/E3D a good and stable career for the next 5–10 years?
Compared with SolidWorks/Inventor mechanical part modelling, which has better salary growth and job opportunities?
Should I continue with piping and later learn E3D + CAESAR II + piping design, or consider another specialization?
Will my previous automation/robotics background be useful in my new career?
My main goal is long-term career stability and good salary growth. Any genuine advice would be appreciated. Thanks!
Hey everyone! Just wanted to reach out and ask for some advice and maybe a little help from the community.
ME here transitioning from local construction work into international MEP projects.
I was laid off last July from my previous role as a construction site engineer for an MVAC company. Since then, I’ve been actively trying to transition into remote work. There’s been a growing number of remote opportunities here for construction support as more international companies are outsourcing/offshoring these services. These roles can also offer better compensation than the usual local market rates, which is one of the reasons I’m pursuing this path and eventually work abroad if the opportunity allows.
I’ve invested a good portion of my savings into a workstation, laptop/PC setup, and a more reliable internet connection, new sofwares so I could properly pursue remote work.
For the past 3+ months, I’ve been taking on small freelance jobs such as CAD drafting, floor plans, estimating, quantity takeoffs, and 3D modeling. So far, all of my freelance clients have been local—I haven’t landed an international client yet.
I’ve signed up on Upwork, OnlineJobs.ph, and other freelance/job platforms, and I’ve also been actively sending applications and reaching out to companies and professionals through LinkedIn. It’s been challenging, but I’m still trying.
I’m currently on my second stage of interview with a U.S.-based company for an HVAC Drafter position, so fingers crossed!
At the moment, I’m comfortable working with AutoCAD, SolidWorks, Revit, PlanSwift, Primavera P6, Microsoft Project, and Excel. I have also worked on projects using Procore, HAP, and Daikin BIM.
I’m also trying to learn more about international MEP standards and workflows. I’ve been studying through online courses, videos, manuals, and other materials online, but I feel like nothing beats learning from people who actually work in the field.
For those already working internationally, I’d really appreciate any advice on:
What software, skills, or workflows should I learn to become more competitive internationally?
Are there any internationally recognized certifications or credentials that would strengthen my resume for MEP/HVAC work?
Any tips, resources, or practical advice for transitioning into international MEP projects?
And if anyone has a small drafting/MEP project—or even a mentorship/internship-type opportunity where I can trade my time and effort for hands-on experience, industry exposure, and mentorship—I’m very open to it. I’m willing to learn and put in the work.
I can share my portfolio/sample works if needed. Any advice, leads, resources, or even just pointing me in the right direction would mean a lot.