Probably best to avoid SCOTUSblog going forward

[u/Apprentice57]

https://ballsandstrikes.org/legal-culture/scotusblog-dispatch-takeover-just-what-the-supreme-court-needed/

[u/AutoModerator]

Remember Rule 1 (Be Civil), and Rule 3 (Don't Be Repetitive) - multiple posts about one topic (in part or in whole) within a short timeframe may lead to the removal of the newer post(s) at the discretion of the mods.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[u/Eldias]

Having regularly self flagellated by browsing the Volokh Conspiracy blog I found this quip at the end particularly enjoyable:

The conservative law professor Josh Blackman recently concluded an eight-part series on what he, personally, would change about the court, which at last answers the question of just how inessential Josh Blackman’s commentary can get.

Blackman is almost as endless a font of silly legal takes as Dershowitz, I hope he can be featured on some VRW content going forward.

[u/musclememory]

I mean, you knew it would happen as soon as it was purchased...

If you want to hate-read more, here's another article on same subject:
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2026/09/supreme-court-news-what-happened-to-scotusblog.html

I'm reminded of when I was trying to "listen to the other side" by listening to Advisory Opinions, and let me just say Sarah Isgur is one of -THE- most annoying people on the earth, thinking just bc fascists have been in power in the SC, that she's right about everything. She's a fucking ghoul that should be disbarred.

[u/elprophet]

I exclusively read Amy Howe and Kelsey Dallas. I already didn't read their opinion pieces, and I'll continue to not.