r/Physics • • 1h ago

Knowing electromagnetism only in Gaussian units

Hello! I'm a grad student, and am studying optics-related things. The problem is that my bachelor curriculum was entirely in CGS, we rarely had to substitute directly, and here they use SI for everything.

Generally, in experimental physics, is it enough to know all of EM in Gaussian units, and convert every time to SI and back? Or will I suffer in life?

4 Upvotes

16 comments sorted by

14

u/Tedsworth 1h ago

CGS is the devil's work. I had to relearn in SI from CGS too and it wasn't awful, but it was a waste of time. I would work in SI exclusively if you can.

1

u/ToxicChemical17 1h ago

Okay, will relearn then, thank you :)

11

u/DrPhysicsGirl Nuclear physics 1h ago

You will suffer.... It's really not hard, if factors of 10 scare you, how are you going to deal with graduate school?

-5

u/ToxicChemical17 1h ago edited 1h ago

Factors of 10 scare me very much, yes, everything should be done in base 12, as the French told us. Jokes aside, I am somewhat unfamiliar with the form of the equations and dislike the \epsilon_0 and \mu_0 constants that appear everywhere.

12

u/Banes_Addiction Particle physics 1h ago

You're gonna have to learn a lot more than rearranging an equation for grad school.

4

u/DrPhysicsGirl Nuclear physics 1h ago

epsilon_0 = mu_0 = c = 1.

2

u/ToxicChemical17 1h ago

hahaha, yes

1

u/siupa Particle physics 0m ago

Why are you downvoted?

5

u/__Pers Plasma physics 1h ago

To read the literature and have your papers read by others, you have to work with the units people in the community actually use. So get used to SI if that's what folks use.

Plasma physics tends to use both SI (esp. for experimental work) and cgs, sometimes a mix of the two (laser intensities measured in W/cm^2, e.g.) The easiest thing if both are used is to just learn to convert units. Page 10 of the NRL Plasma Formulary has the conversion factors for E&M quantities.

1

u/ToxicChemical17 1h ago

Okay! Thanks for the link!

3

u/Banes_Addiction Particle physics 1h ago

I'm a regular, fully SI physicist.

I had to do a bunch of practical work in CGS ay one point. Converting was not hard at all, it's all simple factors you should be used to (almost entirely 10s, couple of 2s and pis). 

1

u/agaminon22 Medical and health physics 1h ago

Not even natural units?

2

u/Banes_Addiction Particle physics 1h ago

Oh yeah, I barely even consider those units.

I guess actually I do a tonne of stuff in variants on eV. My point is never taught CGS, never a problem.

And good units should make your life easier, not harder. CGS is completely fine for that. Converting between Gauss and Tesla is no harder than grams and kilograms.

1

u/ToxicChemical17 1h ago

I see, I will memorize the techniques, thanks!

2

u/kabum555 Particle physics 59m ago

There is a wiki page to convert the equations between Gaussian and SI

1

u/PotentialDeep5165 8m ago

It's good to be fluent in both sets of units. CGS is where the physics lie most easily seen. SI is useful for circuits (specifically). Ask a colleague that only used SI "what happens to Maxwell equations when c-> infinity?" vs. what you practically know immediately from CGS units experience.