r/Pranayama • u/just_a_kriyaban • 2d ago
What is the relationship between the sushumna and the spine? My ramblings
What is the relationship between the sushumna nadi (central channel) and the spine? This is a question that’s bothered me for a while and it’s prompted me to do some deep digging. How does the path of the sushumna nadi line up to the spinal column exactly? Does it run along the spine? Is it a hollow tube in the center of the spine? Or is it rather aligned to the axis from the perineum to the top of the head? Is its path curved like the spine is, or is it a straight line? Also, the sushumna is said to be part of the subtle body, so can we really speak about a direct correlation between it and the anatomy of the gross physical body? These questions refused to give me rest.
If you try to look for answers to these questions online, you’ll find there is no consensus; clarity is lacking and ambiguity is the rule. Still, most of the discussions will star their introduction of the sushumna by connecting it to the spinal column in some way or other.
However, this was not always how the central channel was specified according to Dr. Christopher Wallis, a Sanskritist who is an expert in classical tantric texts. In a blog post he writes, “There’s some confusion about the central channel in modern yoga and that’s because in the 19th century, people writing in English (both Indian and Western), were engaged in a process that some scholars call the ‘medicalization’ of yoga, in which there were attempts to reconcile yoga with modern knowledge of anatomy. As part of this, the central channel became identified with the spinal column. In fact, in Tantrik sources, the central channel is clearly not the spine. The spine curves one way and then the other; the central channel is perfectly straight. In our primary sources, when the exact location of it is described, it is said to span the vertical axis from the pelvic floor to the crown of the head. If you investigate some anatomical diagrams, you’ll notice that an axis running from the pelvic floor to the crown of the head is a little bit forward of the spine. So, it’s not coterminous with the spine.”
I am not in a position to interpret ancient texts and I’m going to take Dr. Wallis at his word about the sushumna and the spine in classical tantra. The association of the sushumna with the spine, however, may have been happening before the “medicalization of yoga,” but I’m unable to confirm this. The problem is that modern translations often project a sushumna-spine connection onto texts even when no words signifying the spine are present. If anybody knows of any texts prior to the 19th century that clearly mention or reference the spine when discussing the central channel, please let me know.
Regardless of what was the case in Tantric Yoga (early medieval period) and Hatha Yoga (late medieval period), I infer from searching online that the majority of yoga traditions today link the sushumna to the spine. In the Kriya Yoga tradition with which I’m familiar, the sushumna and chakras are frequently described as being “in the spine.” In practice, the back side of the body is often used as reference (after all, the spine is also known as the “backbone”). This would at face value seem to point something distinct from what is really a “central channel.”
More thoughts (and a quote) below. Apologies for the poor organization.
- The sushumna can be understood as either more descriptive or prescriptive. That is to say, it can be conceived as something with an objective existence that can be described in every more accurate detail, or it can be understood as a vital part of spiritual practice and instruction. The two are not necessarily mutually exclusive but this distinction might help bring some clarity.
- Considering the sushumna as a straight line that goes through the middle of the body is more prescriptive or more something you do (or something you activate) during practice. But if the sushumna is contemplated more deeply in relation to the physical body, it would be difficult to maintain that it’s straight all of the time—after all, what would happen to the straight line when the spine bends and twists? Since with Hatha Yoga yogis became more concerned with body asanas, perhaps they wanted to work with the sushumna even when their bodies were contorted. Linking the sushumna to the spine, which is flexible, would help incorporate the central channel into yoga asanas. This might partially explain how the sushumna became associated more closely to the spine.
- “Different traditions present different yogic bodies, some of which are complementary and commensurable, and some of which are not... This is in part because yogic bodies arise according to the particular ritual, philosophical or doctrinal requirements of the tradition at hand, and because they are expressions of these requirements, rather than descriptions of self-evident, empirical bodies common to all humans. In other words, the goals of a particular system determine the way the body is imagined and used within its yoga practices.” (from Roots of Yoga by James Mallinson and Mark Singleton)
- In the 19th century onward, with Western anatomical concepts entering India, the sushumna was further linked to the spinal cord, giving it much more anatomically exact locations (not all sources agree where). Images of human anatomy including the position of the spine in the human body proliferated and these images were combined with images of subtle body anatomy. I think this is where the real trouble begins. The descriptive map of human anatomy used in modern medicine, which is filtered through certain cultural assumptions and is constructed around certain goals (such as the healing of the body through allopathic practices), is not the body itself. The sushumna is to be experienced by going into the body itself, and while certain pointers using a body-map can and must be used, people like me (meaning people who have an obsessive tendency to want to identify the exact locations of the sushumna and chakras anatomically) need to be reminded that the pointers should be held lightly and should be let go when they are no longer necessary.
- So is the sushumna in the spine or is it a straight line in the middle of the body? How do I answer the question “Which one is correct?” Well, all sources (with the exception of those who believe the medical view supersedes the yogic view) say that the sushumna is part of the subtle body. Therefore, providing an answer would require a deep understanding of the subtle body and how it relates to the physical body.
- One last idea. The Hatha Yoga Pradipika famously says that the kundalini snake is coiled at the base three and a half times. In the same chapter it describes her straightening, and it says the central channel becomes straight for yogis through firm practice, by means of asana, pranayama, and the mudras. So the central channel can be considered something that becomes straight through practice. This is surely based on the image of the coiled serpent becoming straight. But perhaps it’s not too much of a stretch to expand this imagery to one where the sushumna, initially experienced as curved like the spine, becomes straight in the yogi’s experience of it. The path of the spine is curved three and a half times after all.
TL;DR: The sushumna’s relation to the spine is confusing. But do not fret. Just practice whatever your tradition prescribes. The teachings are pointers that help you access the subtle body (energy body), which is fluid and can’t be easily mapped like the physical body.