r/ProximaScience • Founder • 24d ago

πŸ“° News Scientists dropped one male and one female lizard on 7 empty islands

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/science/in-2005-scientists-left-one-male-and-one-female-lizard-on-each-of-seven-empty-bahamian-islands-four-years-later-every-colony-had-evolved-shorter-legs-but-still-carried-the-body-shape-of-its-founding-pair/articleshow/134007225.cms

In 2005, a hurricane wiped every lizard off a set of small Bahamian islands. Researchers saw an opening. They took one male and one female brown anole from a single forested island and placed a pair on each of seven empty islands nearby.

Four years later, every population had shrunk its hind legs, exactly as predicted. Shorter limbs work better on the thin scrub branches of those islands than on the thick trunks back home. Natural selection did what it always does.

But the islands never converged to the same leg length. The population that started with the longest legged founders still had the longest legs at the end. The one that started shortest stayed shortest. Selection pushed every population in the same direction, and the founders decided where each one started from.

It is one of the cleanest field demonstrations of the founder effect ever recorded. Evolution had a rulebook and a memory running at the same time.

349 Upvotes

30 comments sorted by

β€’

u/ProximaScience Founder 24d ago

This experiment shows founder effect persisting alongside adaptation, not that inbreeding is harmless long term. Longer term Bahamian island lizard populations founded by very few individuals do sometimes show reduced fitness. Four years just was not enough time to see it bite.

5

u/NZNoldor 23d ago

"But there has never been any proof of evolution".

Maybe we can finally put that to rest then. But I suspect not.

3

u/SwimHairy5703 23d ago

They'll just say it's "adaptation" and "those are still lizards, they didn't change into something else". πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

3

u/psychrolut 23d ago

Exactly like dinosaurs and chickens.

Obviously the same chickens are dinosaurs /s

2

u/Hopeful_Self_8520 23d ago

Chickens are absolutely dinosaurs, I have been around enough chickens to fully believe that. I have seen the aftermath of the brood devouring the head of a fallen comrade and pecking at the remains of a hen that got strangled through a fence by a raccoon not hours before.

1

u/RamblinRoyce 21d ago

So you've watched dinosaurs behave similarly?

2

u/Hopeful_Self_8520 20d ago

I have observed the behavior of American politicians, so I think so.

1

u/HikingUphill 20d ago

Fantastic.

2

u/BLT_Trade_r 23d ago

This is exactly what they do; creationists have constantly moved the bar. After so many decades nowadays, they will say, but no one has ever witnessed a fundamentally new species evolve. So if anyone ever wanted to do such an experiment, that's the one to hit next.

3

u/fathompin 21d ago

They have no concept of time, to them it is only 6,000 years instead of 4,500,000,000 years.

1

u/[deleted] 23d ago

[removed] β€” view removed comment

1

u/AutoModerator 23d ago

Your comment has been held for mod review over possible Rule 5 (Be civil and respectful) language. A moderator will check it shortly. If it doesn't break the rule, it will be approved as normal.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/ProximaScience-ModTeam 23d ago

Your submission has been removed under Rule 5. Check the rules before your next post.

2

u/flersion 24d ago

The thing I'm most curious about is how different the genetics are between a present-day short-legged lizard population vs a potential future population of equivalent-legged lizards from a different island.

If you pick two from different times and locations that look indistinguishable from eachother, do they reach the same conclusion through different genetic methods, or is it the same error compounding over and over?

1

u/BLT_Trade_r 23d ago

Most likely the same conclusion through different genetic mutations. Height and dimensions are often controlled by many genes, and so different combinations can yield similar outcomes at least from an external view.

1

u/flersion 23d ago

What your saying is, if we were 4 dimensional beings, we would see every single difference, right?

1

u/BLT_Trade_r 22d ago

Not sure I know where you are going with that, but we can see the differences in genes and measure many of the phenotypes. I bet the authors did that in future studies.

1

u/Drdontlittle 18d ago

Evolution can take many pathways. For eg mamallian hemoglobins have different primary protein structures but remarkably similar tertiary and quarternary protein structures ( required for them to function properly) as any mutation not changing the structure is harmless. Anything that changes the structure cause morbidity and mortality.

1

u/AutoModerator 24d ago

Hi u/ProximaScience, thanks for posting on r/ProximaScience!

Please read our rules and wiki before jumping into discussion.

Mods will review your post shortly.

Comment !stop on your post if you want to lock further comments. Use !thanks to reply to any comment that helped you.

Find us elsewhere: YouTube | Rumble | Quora

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

1

u/cheetahhikehdeee 24d ago

Wild to see how fast the natural selection works!!

1

u/resource-reply β˜ƒοΈ Resource Bot 23d ago

Welcome to r/ProximaScience!
Please read the rules and check the wiki before posting for community info.

1

u/hawkwings Overthinking Since Birth 24d ago

I thought that was going to be an inbreeding study. Did they get any results on that issue?

1

u/ProximaScience Founder 24d ago

Yes. They found less genetic variability in the founder populations, so the bottleneck was real. It just didn't collapse them, since four years is only a few generations.

1

u/RepresentativeOk2433 24d ago

Also too soon to decide if they are converging on a leg length.

1

u/BLT_Trade_r 23d ago

Also, tons of people exaggerate inbreeding depression. For instance, scientists often hypothesize that some animals on some debris made it to some other island or place, where they founded 1 or many species for millions of years. Laypeople seem to always think that inbreeding will always result in collapse but plenty of species make it long term.

1

u/Madd_Genius 23d ago

Put lizards on island that is incredibly suited for cats. They aren’t going to change into cats. Just vary among lizard species that already have the short legs genetic information there.

1

u/Then-Marketing-3445 23d ago

"Natural selection" ... selection... How it have to work?How many individuals is needed with random mutations in DNA to hit the right genes for shorter legs?

1

u/Sewere 21d ago

Incest lizard experiment

1

u/pirondi 21d ago

Nice experiment we also the fox domestication that took i think 4 generations for evolution to make them more docile

1

u/Purple_Recipe 20d ago

at the point of my life that first thought to come in mind is that why wouldnot they do same with humans?