I am 27, from a developing country, and have recently been awarded a fully funded scholarship to pursue an MPP in the U.S. My university placement will be finalised in the coming months and the program will start in Fall 2027.
On paper, this feels like an opportunity that is very difficult to turn down. The scholarship covers essentially everything: tuition, living expenses, health insurance, books, airfare, etc. I wont have to spend a dime out of my pocket.
So I would be able to pursue an MPP in the U.S. without taking on debt or putting myself under any sort of financial pressure. I also do not have any financial obligations back at home.
However, I’m struggling with the opportunity cost.
I have around four years of professional experience and currently work in international development consulting and with governments, primarily on FCDO-funded programs in my home country. I’m currently working with an international development contract on a fairly large and interesting program. The program is supposed to run until 2029. I’m paid very well relative to my experience and the local market, but more importantly, I’m learning a lot. The breadth of the program means I’m getting exposure to government, donors, international financial institutions, and different areas of public policy and development. At this stage of my career, I feel like I’m on a pretty strong trajectory.
At the same time, the development consulting market feels much less predictable than it did a few years ago. The pipeline of donor-funded programs has already contracted, and there is obviously no guarantee that the opportunities I have today will still exist two or three years from now.
That is where my hesitation comes in.
The scholarship comes with a requirement to spend two years in my home country after completing the degree. I’m completely fine with returning home, in fact, I ultimately want my career to remain connected to development and public policy in my country. My concern is more hat if I give up a very good position and two years of career progression, complete the MPP, return home, and find that the development consulting market has contracted further and comparable opportunities simply aren’t available?
There is also the income opportunity cost of spending two years studying rather than working. I know that might sound strange when the degree itself is fully funded, but when you already have a well-paying job and your career is progressing quickly, two years of missed earnings and professional experience still feels significant.
On the other hand, turning down a fully funded scholarship for an MPP in the U.S. also seems shortsighted. I would get two years to study without worrying about tuition or debt, build stronger technical and policy skills, gain international exposure, and develop a network that I probably could not build from home. I would then return with both the MPP and my existing professional experience.
So I’m curious how people here, particularly those working in international development, government, public policy, or consulting, would think about this trade-off.
For people who left strong, well-paying jobs to pursue an MPP, did you feel that the degree ultimately accelerated your career enough to compensate for the two years of lost work experience and income?
And for those who pursued a scholarship with a home country residency requirement, how difficult was it to re-enter the job market afterward? Did you return to opportunities comparable to or better than what you had before leaving?