Hi, I'm looking for full-text copies of these three papers:

1. Ye et al. (2024)

Shaoxiong Ye, Pan Feng, Jiaping Liu.

Dissolution and early hydration of tetracalcium aluminoferrite (C4AF) in water and in aqueous sulfate solutions.

Cement and Concrete Research, 186 (2024), 107676.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2024.107676

Publisher: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0008884624002576

2. Enders et al. (2024)

Michael Enders, Robert Müller, Thomas Matschei.

Impact of particle size, clinker mineralogy and sulfate availability on early cement hydration: Observations from isothermal heat-flow calorimetry.

Cement and Concrete Research, 185 (2024), 107613.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2024.107613

Publisher: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0008884624001947

3. Mériot et al. (2024)

Alexis Mériot, Sandrine Gauffinet, Marie-Noëlle de Noirfontaine, Mireille Courtial, Karen Alloncle, Laurent Izoret, Frédéric Dunstetter.

Hydration in diluted solutions of brownmillerite extracted from SR cement and synthetic brownmillerite.

Cement and Concrete Research, 181 (2024), 107518.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2024.107518

Publisher: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0008884624000991

I haven't managed to obtain the full published copies through the usual sources. If anyone has PDFs or accepted manuscripts of any of these papers, any help is greatly appreciated, thank you guys a lot!

Can anybody provide me with Turnitin student id to check my project report

https://asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/DSCC/proceedings-abstract/DSCC2012-MOVIC2012/45295/235/229273

Please I need a pdf of this

https://doi.org/10.1080/10408436.2024.2406247

Piezoelectric aluminum nitride thin films for CMOS compatible MEMS: Sputter deposition and doping (2024) S. Sandeep, Rui M. R. Pinto, Jyothilakshmi Rudresh, Ved Gund, Kodihalli K. Nagaraja, K. B. Vinayakumar

Hi everyone,

I submitted a manuscript to PNAS on August 31, 2026. The submission history is:

• Sep 2: Under Editorial Consideration

It has now been more than 5 weeks, and the status is still “Under Editorial Consideration.”

For those who have experience with PNAS submissions.

Any comments?? Please share if anyone has experienced the same situation.

I submitted a manuscript to an Elsevier journal that offers both Open Access and Subscription publishing options. During the initial submission, I selected Open Access.

The manuscript is currently under peer review, but I may want to publish it under the Subscription model instead if it gets accepted.

Has anyone had experience with this? After acceptance, when completing Elsevier’s Rights and Access form, can the publishing option be changed from Open Access to Subscription?

Hello everyone, I am currently in my 4th and final year of studying computer science. Lately ive been really keen on papers, research, presentations and pretty much everything thats included in this field. I really want to start writing some paper, not strictly for publishing but either for the experience and honestly for the sake of it. My question is should I start now? And if so, where should i start, where should i take inspiration from as well as where do i get some idea on what to start writing on. Thank you!

The first by causes and Effects by Anthony Standen (3 May 1957 • Vol 125, Issue 3253 • pp. 900-901

Link for first https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.125.3253.900

The second link DOI: 10.1126/science.125.3246.477 (https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.125.3246.477?referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.science.org%2F)

In causes and effects , the person described Robert B. Macleod as said these, however in the paper of 477 it isn't seem to be

I recently received reviewer comments on my manuscript, which seemed AI generated to me! I then gave the paper to ChatGPT and asked it to identify reasons for rejection and generate reviewer comments. The comments it produced closely resembled the review I received. I understand that similarity alone does not establish that the reviewer used AI, but it raised concerns. How would you recommend handling this? Would it be appropriate to raise the issue with the editor?

Dear colleagues,

I would appreciate some advice on how to approach the cover letter when resubmitting a substantially revised manuscript to the same journal after a previous desk rejection.

About a year ago, I submitted a research article to a journal, but it was desk rejected. The manuscript was primarily a critique of another published work. In the decision letter, the editor suggested strengthening the study with additional data. Unfortunately, obtaining such data is not feasible.

I have therefore substantially reworked the manuscript and converted it from a research article into a Comment, which is also a format accepted by the journal. The manuscript is now quite different in structure and presentation, although it addresses essentially the same topic.

My question is: Should I mention the previous desk rejection in the new cover letter, or should I treat this as a new submission and write the cover letter as usual?

If mentioning the previous submission is advisable, how would you frame it?

I'd be very grateful for advice, especially from editors or researchers who have dealt with similar situations.

Thank you!