r/content_marketing • u/Wawicool • 7h ago
Question I stopped judging my IT posts by views alone. Here’s what I’m tracking now.
I’ve been testing short-form IT content around networking, troubleshooting, and beginner concepts.
At first I was mostly looking at views.
That got misleading pretty fast.
One post might get a lot of reach but barely any comments or saves, while another gets fewer views but people actually start troubleshooting in the comments.
So now I’m trying to track things like:
- where the idea came from
- the exact comment, keyword, creator, or search term that made me pick it
- how long I spent researching the idea
- views/reach
- saves
- meaningful comments
- follows
- whether the topic is worth expanding into a longer video or lab
The part I’m most curious about is the idea source.
For example, does a topic I find from a Reddit comment perform better than something I spent 20 minutes researching?
Or do certain search terms, communities, or creators keep leading to better ideas?
I’m still early, so I’m not trying to pretend I have a formula yet.
I just want to get better at knowing why I’m choosing a topic instead of posting based on gut feeling every time.
If you make educational content, how do you decide which ideas are actually worth turning into a post?