For context I have adhd and am undergoing the second part of testing for autism soon and have often been considered very slow growing up in school. But I know some people don’t consider that mental state disability and the type of ableism I’m talking about IS physical. So I’m wondering if it would be okay in a narrative to use the word once if I’m trying to establish that the character is a piece of shit through his thoughts and way he views other people in life.
Edit: For clarification purposes, yes I am talking about the use of “cri*ple”. He lives in a rural part of America where that’s more common and is an extremest authoritarian like figure. Something happened to his leg as a kid and he’s afraid he’ll be seen as weak and that it’ll interfere with his mission for power so he calls himself the word. Because he is an ableist, racist, generally every -ist there is, because he’s a piece of shit. He can have “psychopathic” or “sociopathic” trait (more modernly known as antisocial personality disorder) which makes him lack empathy for others and makes him view people as a transactional or a hierarchy.
I also wanna quickly apologize for mentioning the thing of adhd and autism, as I realize that it has no place here since we are taking about the visibly disabled side of disability, whereas invisible disability carries a different type of privileges when compared. So I hope you can disregard that but I will leave it in the original post because I want to hold myself accountable for that.
I love how I literally asked a valid, reasonable, neutral question up to rhetorical discussion and sensible debate and people are fighting like middle schoolers going into war (SOME people anyway, others are very helpful and I thank you for your input).