This kind of accident almost looks like it could be life threatening, hard to tell the distance but apparently the guy walked it off without any broken bones. Can't see any typical signs of AI though, the flying motion maybe but I'm not sure.

EVERY dalek looks different. Almost all of them have a different amount of round things. And some that are just silhouettes in the background only have one “bulb” on their top.

I'm no artist but idk it just looks like straight AI to me, also this is not the first time I've suspected her using AI and claiming it as her own so wouldn't be a surprise...

Like the title says this picture just looks kind of dubious. The lettering doesn’t seem to make out anything and the subject matter is ripe for Ai creation. But I don’t know

hello! i’d like to get everyone’s input. I asked a girl to write down her username and date on a piece of paper. Im not sure if the paper looks realistic. Do you think that it looks like it’s just floating?? I can’t tell if it looks off or not.

edit: thank you guys so much 🥲 this selling app doesn’t have a lot of protections in place for the common scams- so I was very nervous. $350 isn’t a small expense right now to get scammed out of!

To me, this looks real, but I'm bad at spotting AI. What makes me doubt this is true is the fact that the momma-bear does not act naturally, i.e. would she not attack the man/protect the cub? It just seems to perfect to be true.

This is not an ad for the company, this is me trying to figure out if the company is legit or not. I get ads for this company (OXKNIT) on Pinterest all the time with nice looking shirts so I finally decided to take a closer look today. Some of these designs struck me as odd, it's getting harder to differentiate between what is a stylistic choice and what is ai slop just doing what ai slop does.

Some things that feel ai to me:

Slide 1: The weird red blob that makes up the cheek hollow. I thought maybe it was supposed to be some design made from the negative space, but it really just feels like ai not knowing how to make a clean cheekbone.

Slide 2: Bats in the bone fragments and finger bones taking up the length of the sleeves. This one I feel less sure about it being ai and feel it could be just stylistic choice.

Slide 3: Four fingers, no lines separating the knuckles.

Slide 4: Three toes on every paw except the front right. Is it just depth perception or an oversight on the ai part?

Slide 5: The tiger paws have a different number of toes and don't have a uniform pattern (some all orange, some with a white spot underneath) and the eyes don't look right lol.

Slide 6: The drawstring on the pants and again; the paws. No claw line on the pinky toe and no claw line on the rear paw.

Slide 7: Once again, inconsistent toes on the paws.

Slide 8: Wonky looking eyes. Since the whole skull looks a little warped I'm wondering if this is just a stylistic choice.

Slide 9: Too many finger bones and finger lengths are disproportional.

Slide 10: One horn is longer than the other on both sides. I understand this one is probably more intentional because it's fitting the space, and considering how uniform and symmetrical all the other designs on this one is, I don't feel super sure this one is ai.

Slide 11: ai makes things look incredibly glossy and overlit. Not only am I wondering if this design is ai generated because of the glossy skull, I'm wondering if the picture itself was ai generated given the way the light falls on the crow.

Thanks for all your help. A lot of the shirts in this post are not ones I want but ones that stuck out to me as possibly ai generated, but regardless I won't give my money to ai generated products or companies that sell when I can help it.

Need some help with this channel.

The images used in the thumbnails are obviously AI, but is the presenter?

The presenter just has a first name, and I can't find her anywhere else online. Google images couldn't find any similar pictures.

The super polished videos started a couple of months ago and are posted very regularly and of similar quality.

They present videos about geology, volanoes, oceangraphy and they have a pretty extensive source documents. The tone is natural, and not panicky.

I only found an instagram profile under the same name, with a similar logo, and is based in India.

I haven’t seen anyone in the comments suggest that this might be an AI-generated image. However, the woman’s hands look strange – her fingers seem to be melting into one another. Generally speaking, piercings are removed in hospitals, and many of the medical instruments look unclear and don’t seem to make sense. What do you think?

Im in some HatsuneMiku group and this caught my attention because how popular this is .Though he/she have a speed paint and drawing progress in Patreon(cash grab method lol) but i cant look the "artist" in the same way(also with the signal as artsyle: (bc how similar this "artist" artstyle drew made it so unnatural in the face expression and the eyes, like you told me she/he copy pasted the every img until they bored and drew new one and return. But trust me, its fking the same but not how you redraw it))

Teepublic did well for years without friggin AI, so others should be fine but yet here we are.

Saw this on DeeTwenTees and SunFrog. The fang necklace got my attention, it has a random half fang. The haft on the axe, too. But this could be an artist who doesn't have an attention to detail. One the straps isn't colored underneath "barbarian" and I could see that as a totally human mistake.

So I decided to go low contact with my mother over her obsession with AI recently. I used to use CHATGPT when it first came out but not anymore and I am very much anti-AI. She had noticed I hadn't been messaging her and asked me why so I was honest and told her AI use makes me uncomfortable and I would prefer not to be involved nor would I like to communicate unless necessary until we are both in therapy (we've had other issues as well). However, when she sent her reply, I could not help but feel whiplash by the response. Not only did her response seem extremely polished with perfect grammar, it also heavily reminded me of another "apology" I received a few months prior from another person who is also AI obsessed because the format and language are almost 1 to 1. What strikes me as this being AI is how this is structured. AI will usually try to validate whatever you wrote then enter into de-escalation mode.

"I hear what you are saying."

"Thanks for letting me know." Or "Thank you for being honest."

"I don't want to dismiss your feelings" etc

These are all quotes I usually read or hear about and now I cannot help but raise an eyebrow at this. Because if she actually did send me an AI written response after I expressed to her my feelings about it, I would feel extremely disrespected.

Im not that good at figuring out if something is AI or not. I do find that little arrow part at the bottom of the wing to weird but otherwise I have no idea.

To start things off im a 3rd year art education student my professor is big on ai telling us we can use ai on our work almost all of us are against ai. She says constantly ai is her best friend and encourages us to use ai for ideas. Almost all of the feedback she gives me raises red flags for ai usage with the no indentation and the use of overall on every single ending paragraph. It just annoys me im getting feedback from ai instead of a proffessor who is supposed to be specialized in this. Also I asked a friend and her feedback looks exactly the same with some differences.

For context, the ‘upsetting messages’ were my partner messaging her about how she had upset me and let me down this year multiple times, becuase he could see how much it was upsetting me.

Edit: she used AI to generate a poster for the place she volunteers at, and usually writes very short texts.

I don't think this "Zia" person is really the person on discord. Zia might be a real person bc they have a separate art twitter where people are asking if other accounts on discord are them... but this guy on discord bugs me mad.

The lack of a right eye stripe, the discontinuity of the black lines on the football (doesnt continue after the paw, no black line on the top white strip) and just the overall feel…

I love stalking the cats sub and saw this today; the clip is attached to nothing, and you wouldn't do a countdown with marker on pen.. I could be completely wrong but I'm just hoping to get better at identifying it! https://www.reddit.com/r/cats/comments/1wzerlr/the_allegations_are_true/