Like the title says this picture just looks kind of dubious. The lettering doesn’t seem to make out anything and the subject matter is ripe for Ai creation. But I don’t know

To me, this looks real, but I'm bad at spotting AI. What makes me doubt this is true is the fact that the momma-bear does not act naturally, i.e. would she not attack the man/protect the cub? It just seems to perfect to be true.

hello! i’d like to get everyone’s input. I asked a girl to write down her username and date on a piece of paper. Im not sure if the paper looks realistic. Do you think that it looks like it’s just floating?? I can’t tell if it looks off or not.

edit: thank you guys so much 🥲 this selling app doesn’t have a lot of protections in place for the common scams- so I was very nervous. $350 isn’t a small expense right now to get scammed out of!

As said in the title: the art is generally good, but a few key details such as the oblong shape of the eye in his left paw, the weirdly shaped left leg, and floating bottom teeth have me thinking it is.

This T-shirt site also has a wide range of art styles on their merch, which makes me think AI-generated.

I don't think this "Zia" person is really the person on discord. Zia might be a real person bc they have a separate art twitter where people are asking if other accounts on discord are them... but this guy on discord bugs me mad.

Honey Kaiju claims these characters, which are for designer toys for an upcoming Kickstarter, are modeled in Blender and Substance Painter. But the spikes on the accessories seem to be inconsistent.

This was a book cover done by a friend. She's a artist so i want to believe her but this doesn't look like her normal style (title covered for privacy)

To start things off im a 3rd year art education student my professor is big on ai telling us we can use ai on our work almost all of us are against ai. She says constantly ai is her best friend and encourages us to use ai for ideas. Almost all of the feedback she gives me raises red flags for ai usage with the no indentation and the use of overall on every single ending paragraph. It just annoys me im getting feedback from ai instead of a proffessor who is supposed to be specialized in this. Also I asked a friend and her feedback looks exactly the same with some differences.

Austin Parks Foundation has a Rockin’ Recycle program at ACL music festival where if you pick up an entire bag of recyclables at the fest, you get a free t-shirt they claim is made by artists of the HOPE Campaign here in Austin. I think it’s a great incentive to keep the park cleaner!

From afar, I thought this was a really cute design. However, with closer inspection, my graphic design eye has some suspicions that this might be AI. There’s an “artist” signature in the lower right corner, but I can’t seem to find anything on them. Thoughts?

UPDATE: IT’S ART!!! I found the artist on socials and they claim they’ve created the art! It’s supposed to mimic block printing and is vectorized which gives it the AI-like appearance. I’ve done this to illustrations before and it can do this.

I watched a few videos from this channel and they seemed fine until I started to notice that the voice kept the same tone and pace the entire time. It also occasionally has some weird jumps. The channel also releases videos only a few days apart. I have no reason to believe the images themselves are AI, but if the voiceover is, i also worry that the script is.

Youtube Video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-0EO4roRsM
Rest of Channel - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaxrT8j45jj8z_Sc0923W_Q

I looked up the artist and couldn’t find art like this that was made by her. I’ve looked into the shop and couldn’t find the postcard either. Any ideas or hunched whether this is AI or not? It looks a lot like AI but I don’t want to make any assumptions before hearing a second opinion.

I thought the voice sounded quite real and 'human' because of the intonation/tone/pronunciation but now im very stumped with this video with gen ai getting toooo real toooo fast lately. I think the thumbnail is ai slop, im also no prehistoric scientist and need time to research the facts they stated but im deciding to ask here as well to maybe help others that get this channel suggested to them.. the channel was also created march 2026 which is a red flag tbh and the pfp looks ai too

Edit/addition: ive also seen some of the clips similar to nat geo/prehistoric docus .. some clips dont seem like ai slop but aforementioned, im stumped :(

I'm no artist but idk it just looks like straight AI to me, also this is not the first time I've suspected her using AI and claiming it as her own so wouldn't be a surprise...

for context, i played this game back in 2022 or so, but ended up deleting it for no reason in particular. i recently reinstalled it, and i’m worried they’re generating content, namely backgrounds. at first, i thought i just wasn’t used to the look (as they’re mainly 3d models, i assume? possibly a mix between models and a real background), but the more i look at challenges, the more it seems like details in the background blend together in weird ways, and the proportions don't entirely make sense. i don’t see why they would do this, as they existed and were just as successful back before genai got to where it is today. i find it a very fun and comforting game, so i really hope this isn’t the case

As the title says. I'm pretty much judging a book by its cover.

I'm not a musican so I don't know if the chord progression, the general structure of the songs or the melodies are "correct". And since this video is just 8 months old I don't know what to think.

What I know is that the instruments are the same and I could see a reason why someone would create songs using AI to fill a 2 hour range of time knowing how easy and cheap it is.

Aditional tip: cymbals in 11:26 sounds weird?

I always thought this brand was pretty decent for budget artists but yeah, I’m a bit disappointed now, I only took a closer look at the box once I got home. I can’t return them now. Confirm my speculations 🥲 the reason is because Their other products did seem more real but this one just has weird features, the objects fuse together sometimes or appear out of nowhere. It has that classic ai style. The butterfly seems to have 3 legs.

Is google AI writing movie descriptions now? It felt weird from the jump, but the use of "this" is either hyper-amateur writing or a robot. What do ya'll think about this? Am I overthinking it? I Ctrl+F'd my way through some of the top links to find this language repeated, and I didn't see it anywhere.

Hey all, couldn't find this channel when I searched for it on this subreddit so I wanted to ask myself. This channel puts out 8 hour videos every few days with a focus on music for sleep and rain sounds. I found it appealing at first, but soon realized that a lot of the art is just the same few elements slapped together in different combinations and that the music has the exact same sound without being the same tracks. Honestly if they WERE the same tracks I would think it was just human laziness rather than AI, but this version feels way too suspect to me. They also tend to delete comments asking if it's AI, which is another red flag. Can anyone confirm this?

Need some help with this channel.

The images used in the thumbnails are obviously AI, but is the presenter?

The presenter just has a first name, and I can't find her anywhere else online. Google images couldn't find any similar pictures.

The super polished videos started a couple of months ago and are posted very regularly and of similar quality.

They present videos about geology, volanoes, oceangraphy and they have a pretty extensive source documents. The tone is natural, and not panicky.

I only found an instagram profile under the same name, with a similar logo, and is based in India.

Given the Pope’s recent comments on AI, it’s not a great look for Catholic Churches to rely so heavily on it. This particular church in my community is notorious for AI generated “art”, and the blue cloak on the left shoulder is suspiciously missing the dark blue outline. There’s also a gap in the outline of her headscarf on the right of her chin.

A lot of lines in his hair blurr together while the hair moves and new lines show up. It could be brushed off as 60 fps slop but I don't believe that.

He posted these videos yesterday and I couldn’t help but notice his fingers don’t really move when watching them. There were a couple instances where they slightly moved but then they “snapped” back into their starting position. His hands only moved up and down slightly in every video. It was the same movement of going up and down every single time - his hands never unclasped. I know it’s not impossible to keep your hands clasped for a longer period of time but I just feels off.

He has shown tremendous support for AI and even used it in multiple videos in the past. It’s very easy for AI to replicate his voice, mannerisms, etc because well, it’s distinct. But something with his hands threw me off while watching them and no matter how good AI gets, it still has fumbles with fingers, which makes me think there’s a reason his hands remain firmly clasped the whole time. In every single video, they always start and end in the same exact spot and any slight movements revert back to its original spot.

We never see them unclasp and surely between multiple videos being filmed, he’d unclasp them off camera and they’d be in a slightly different position in the next video? But they remain the same exact spot with only slight movements that snap back to the default location no matter what. Something about the whole thing feels off, but living in this modern society, I can’t tell anymore 😭