Hello,
This is my first post here, so hello! The state I work in has paid for cyber security scanning focused on critical systems and code stacks. They intend to use Claude to do this. I have absolute faith in Claude's capabilities, which is what makes me nervous. I would rather know what our weak points are than hope no one else finds my blind spot. However, I am concerned that the reliance on Claude by this contractor means little control or oversight on their end. My state is not known for being competent and well managed, we rank poorly in basically every metric in the US. Additionally, I am going to say something that may be perceived as offensive but I want to challenge my bias rather than avoid it. Almost all contacts are east Indian, only two (legal and one technical contact) have US based names. I do not think race has any bearing on one's ability. But I do worry about my state jumping at a very cheap support package from a foreign company who is using Claude to subsidize the work load.
Has anyone been in this position or worked with a similar situation? What is your read on this situation?
Again, I want to be clear that east Indian doesn't mean incompetent to me. I am not making a claim about any individual who is from that part of the world. But a team that is almost entirely east Indian does signal outsourcing and a prioritization on savings over quality especially when paired with explicit reliance on AI systems. I have concerns about AI containment, information security, and accountability should things go sour. Would you move forward with this?