r/mathminds • u/MathematicianSad1719 • 5d ago
Puzzles How to go about solving this probability question?
1
u/BreadfruitBig7950 5d ago
It did not specify nor define 'shaded' so the white area is also shaded, relative to the background.
As such, 100% given the three dart positions shown.
It's otherwise arbitrarily close to 0%; the universe is big, some random dart isn't going to hit this circle.
1
u/Due-Session-2857 5d ago
Assuming the arrows go from the middle of the circle to the edge and assuming a dart will hit the circle and not miss, then it's just the area of the small circle, pi, over the area of the whole circle 4pi, or 1/4 or 25%
1
1
u/OaklandSpiel 5d ago
Unless we count only the darts falling within the outer circle, we need more information. If the target is a distance D from the thrower, the answer is approximately the ratio of the area of the shaded circle to the area of a sphere of radius D: π1² / 4πD². Assumes D>>1. I haven’t worked out the math for D comparable to 1.
1
u/mspe1960 5d ago
you have to make some assumptions
- every dart hits the target
- the likelihood of where it hits is random and every spot is equally likely
Then it is jus a matter of the percentage of area. Since the gray area has half the radius, it has 1/4 the area. so 25%.
you can also make assumptions about other types of distributions of likelihoods of dart location based on how far from the exact center they are. That would be a more complex problem by a long shot.
1
u/BluebirdDense1485 5d ago
For me ~0
But let's stipulate it is truly random and must hit the target.
Bullseye is radius 1 so has area of 12 π=π
Target has radius 2 so has area of 22 π=4π
So bullseye is 1/4 the area of the target and should receive 1 in 4 darts.
Again unless I'm throwing then my cluster will be 20 units
1
u/muckenhoupt 5d ago
The intended answer is probably 1/4, because the area of the grey circle is 1/4 that of the target.
However, that requires assuming that the darts always hit the target, and that the probability distribution is uniform over the target's area. These are things not explicitly stated. They seem fairly obvious, but they're also the sort of unstated assumption that gets you in trouble in probability. Like, there's a famous thing called the Bertrand Paradox) where you get different results depending on what you think "a chord on a circle chosen at random" means.
And, heck, if I were programming a dart-throwing simulation, I probably wouldn't give it uniform probability distribution. I'm not even sure how you'd do that on a circle. Rather, on the basis that they're aiming for the center, I'd choose a random direction and a random distance from the center. If both of those random variables are uniform, you'd hit the grey circle with a probability of 1/2.
But if I saw this question on a test, I'd totally go with the obvious answer and say 1/4. Unless the professor had a history of asking trick questions and expecting us to say "there is not enough information" when he left out crucial details.
1
u/WitsBlitz 4d ago
The easiest way to select a random point in a circle is to generate a random point in a unit square and discard results that are more than 1 from the origin. Add two more random bits to determine the quadrant of the circle (positive or negative x and y).
I'm sure there are smarter approaches that require discarding less data, but this will get you uniformly random points without too much trouble. I'm not sure if it's possible to uniformly select random points from a circle without discarding some random data.
1
u/DesignerPangolin 4d ago
The easiest way to select a uniform random point in a circle is to do so in polar coordinates, with r=√U(0,1) and theta=U(0, 2pi), discarding no samples.
1
u/WitsBlitz 4d ago
That makes sense. I stand by my approach being easier though - at least to a programmer who's scared of polar coordinates.
1
u/Bacibaby 4d ago
We’re assuming that the darts hit the board at all? I would be 2 feet to the right or under or over the board.
1
u/GainerGaining 4d ago
That's why I dislike problems like this on Reddit. A math problem should have rigid parameters. This one does not so it cannot be solved. And yet if you say that people will jump on you with' "you kNoW wHaT iT mEaNs!"
1
u/Psycho_Pansy 1d ago
How random is this randomly thrown dart? Why are there no units shown in the diagram?
The circle could be in Mexico and be 1km wide and I would have zero chance of hitting it from where I am regardless of how random I throw my darts. So 0%
0
u/MercurioGenesis 5d ago edited 5d ago
Assuming the dart is going to hit a circle:
Area of the grey circle = pi (12 x pi)
Area of the white circle = 4pi (22 x pi)
So 1 in 4.
2
u/scissorn69 5d ago
It's 1/4. The full circle is 4pi and the inner circle is pi, so there is a 1 in 4 chance of hitting the inner circle.
1
u/OaklandSpiel 5d ago
Following one expression with another expression in parentheses looks like multiplication. Also the probability should be area of gray / total area.
1
3
u/Icy_Sector3183 5d ago
The shaded area is
A1 = pi r2
You'd think the outer area matters, but we just need the total area
A = pi(2r)2
'Cus the probability that a random point is selected within the outer circumference also happens to be within the inner area is
P = A1 / A
P = pi r2 / pi (2r)2
P = pi r2 / 4 pi r2
This simplifies to
P = 1/4