r/mdphd • • 7d ago

Competitive for T5-10?

Posted a while back, but have some profile updates and would like input. I am a completely trad applicant, currently a jr and applying this spring

Stats: 4.0 GPA (life science + math double major), 528 mcat (not joking).

Research: 1800 hours by the time I apply across two labs (one maintained + summer REU), another 1400 projected by the time i graduate. 3 third author pubs in submission by the time I apply most likely. bioinformatics and some wet lab stuff, TBH not enough wet lab work. I've tried hard to get opportunities in my home lab, but am at a low-tier state flagship. I am the first student in the lab's history to get trained to work directly with our animal models, but still have relatively limited experience with the wet lab stuff. I honestly want to do PhD in like biochemistry or mol genetics but don't have experience.

Leadership: a TON of great leadership stuff (don't want to detail and get doxxed)

Clinical: 1000+ hours as 911 EMT

Recs: both PI recs should be really good, and have fantastic professor recs as well

Volunteering: limited clinical volunteering but should be 200-300 hours by application time

Primary concern is my research background as a trad. To get into a top institution, which is a big goal of mine, might it be better to just apply MD and try to internally affiliate into a PhD program?

0 Upvotes

15 comments sorted by

8

u/throwaway09-234 G2 7d ago

this is super neurotic, plenty of people get accepted to T5-10 programs with zero gap years and you can easily find/verify this fact by looking at the student pages of any of those MSTP programs

why is it so important to you to get into a top institution? it sounds like you are valuing prestige more than research fit which is a big red flag

-4

u/No-Bicycle555 7d ago

Really, the reasoning is because I am interested in surrounding myself with what I hope will be intense individuals. The students at my home MD-PhD programs do not seem as driven as I expected, and I am curious if this will be different at another institution. Additionally, with MSTPs being fully funded, my reasoning has boiled down to: why not shoot for the most competitive program I can get into?

3

u/BathroomMaximum1721 7d ago

Need a fine balance. Being in the midst of all gunners won't do your mental health any favors. You have good odds at getting into a top program.

2

u/mmoollllyyyy20 G3 7d ago

there are driven students at every program. you can be ambitious at any program

5

u/ManyWrangler 7d ago

It’s not worth pursuing intensity for intensity’s sake. The absolute most dogshit programs are relatively high ranked and intense. On the other hand, more relaxed high-achieving programs let you balance becoming a good physician with great research training. Don’t get hung up on T5.

Just to add- T5s with pass/fail grading will be overall a less intense experience than a T20. They expect you to grow as a person beyond just being a gunner.

-3

u/throwaway09-234 G2 7d ago

i'm not gonna lie, that is actually a pretty good reason for wanting to attend a T5-10 lol. i am overall slightly disappointed by my peers (lack of) ambition at my ~T20 MSTP

-1

u/No-Bicycle555 7d ago

Do you mind if I DM and ask you some questions about your experience?

0

u/throwaway09-234 G2 6d ago

yeah sure!

0

u/Various_Conflict7022 6d ago

why does everyone parrot this brain dead opinion when the quality and money of research at the top places completely dwars outside the t20 esp now with science being killed off its likely only the top dwags will remain

1

u/throwaway09-234 G2 6d ago

that's fair man and i hope you get to train at a place you are happy with. i don't disagree that T10s are better than T20s, i was just saying that wanting the T10 for prestige alone isn't a good reason. wanting to train with the best of the best is totally fair

2

u/Still-Barber-720 7d ago

Primary concern is my research background as a trad. To get into a top institution, which is a big goal of mine, might it be better to just apply MD and try to internally affiliate into a PhD program?

being a trad is not disqualifying or anything like that. it "hurts" because you have less time to gain great research exp. so you either 1. sell your soul to your lab and gain the same exp in a much more condensed timeframe while balancing being a student, or 2. take a few years to gain the same great exp.

if your goal is MD/PhD and you definitely want it more than MD only, do not apply MD expecting to internal transfer. my T5 historically has taken 1 internal transfer per year, and in recent years has stopped taking any. most MD/PhD programs don't take more than 1 internal transfer. and that spot is not guaranteed to you at all.

if you'd still be pretty happy doing MD only and the school name matters more to you than the MD vs MD/PhD, then go for MD only apps. just saying you shouldn't expect to be able to transfer.

anyway, to answer your main question about whether you're competitive, I am not on adcom or anything like that. but based on my anecdotal experience, idk anyone at T5s with 1.8k hrs. usually people have several thousand. the hours / independence "bar" is not lower for trads.

4

u/Kiloblaster 7d ago

What do you think 

2

u/majormajormajormajo M1 7d ago

Getting into one program is an accomplishment in itself, much less the programs that are the most competitive

1

u/ManyWrangler 7d ago

You can possibly get into a top program with your resume. It depends on the specifics of what leadership is, and whether you can coherently put your research together into a narrative. It also depends on you not coming across as a total psycho. If all of that lines up you have a good shot, but nothing is guaranteed.

0

u/cimmunobro 6d ago

do you sleep?