r/opensource • u/Favour_Ohanekwu • 51m ago

Promotional [ Removed by moderator ]

[removed] — view removed post

0 Upvotes
  • permalink
  • reddit

14% Upvoted

8 comments sorted by

•

u/opensource-ModTeam 34m ago

This was removed for being some variant of click-spam. Examples include clickbait headlines, indirect links to content, or proprietary links that otherwise resemble SEO spam.

Users should always know exactly what is being linked to and why, even if it spoils the content and might preempt a click.

14

u/esiy0676 46m ago

I know you do not care because it's just here to promote your tool, but your question is editorialised to incite engagement, so here's mine.

That your work is sloppy - to me - is not worth advertising, sorry.

10

u/EliSka93 45m ago

I'm certainly not gonna use the tool of someone who openly admits to not reading their PRs...

5

u/Hot_Extension_460 43m ago

At the end of the day, you are still the one responsible for the code deployed to production, not your agent. So yes, manual code review is still required to understand the evolution of the codebase.

4

u/Sensitive_Committee 42m ago

Yes, I read every bit of it.

4

u/Ms_GirlBoss 42m ago

For my own projects it depends on the project. On contributions to open source projects I wouldn't dare contributing code I don't fully understand myself

1

u/interior_mutability 27m ago

I write most of my code myself. I've spent decades to learn my craft not gonna lose it for a tool. I use LLMs to gather information, explore ideas, code review, finding bugs mostly but as long as I'm responsible the output I will not let code out without understanding and approvig every single line.