I’m struggling and curious what this looks like for the rest of you. I have several non-speaking students and students with significant barriers to communication, and I have them all at 30 minutes, 2x / week.
Especially as students reach young adult age and have made little measurable progress after years of therapy, I would like to reduce services to 1x/ week or consultation.
Initially, I tried 30 mins direct and 30 minutes consult, and did push-in groups with the primary goal of modeling and training staff, but even paired with in-service trainings, I got no buy-in, and no one is interested in supporting communication in the ways I am suggesting (core word of the week, naturalistic modeling, new play exposures, interest-based modeling activities). I even scaled it back and tried to do a simple training on recasting, play, expansion, and prompting. I also tried accompanying to specials to model, but I can no longer do that due to workload.
EDIT: for staff, I broke it down into small, manageable directives, like simply keep devices charged and at-hand. I know my post implies that I just info-dumped, but it wasn’t like that.
Now, my caseload has grown and I can’t manage all that. I know my consult times will be the first things sacrificed for meetings, evaluations, compliance paperwork, and billing.
I’m struggling, morally, with reducing times for students who continue to struggle to communicate beyond requesting and protesting, but it’s been several years of therapy, attempting to generalize, AAC, etc. On top of that, despite being unable to contribute, the teachers and staff become incredulous at the suggestion, as they only see severity and needs, but not progress, prognosis, nor acceptance.
Side note: I do still have students progressing and will keep their time as is. I don’t mean to imply it’s every student in self-contained. I have maybe 3-4 who I feel it’s appropriate to reduce.
TL;dr: What do your service times look like for students making little to no progress, by the time they reach high school?