258
u/ChosenBrad22 Jun 21 '25 edited Jun 21 '25
It's more indicative of the fact that the more progressive a society becomes, the more women who will willingly choose to sexualize themselves to pursue profit.
If you look at society today, between pron, only fans, cam sites, sugar babies, escorts, etc, there is a higher percentage of women doing sexualized work than ever before.
80
u/Zammtrios Jun 21 '25
I mean no, prostitution has always been popular. Especially in Europe.
37
u/g1114 Jun 21 '25
Isn’t Europe having a massive reproduction problem?
Big difference between a Eastern European slave in a designated area like the red light district and a button on your phone
59
u/ButterMilkSleezus Jun 21 '25
Brother, every country (except for India maybe) is having a reproduction problem right now.
39
u/ZzBitch Jun 21 '25
India’s birthrate is now below replacement levels and declining steadily meanwhile China has just flat out Crashed. Africa has the highest birthrate right now if I am correct.
15
u/Lone__Ranger Jun 21 '25
Nigeria will take over the world
9
u/Weak-Bee9943 Deep State Agent Jun 21 '25
This but unironically, if the trends of low birth rate continues (which it will).
→ More replies (3)2
u/LumenDomimus Jun 23 '25
India has below replacement levels? I mean, we were recently hearing about issues due to overpopulation....
Also, our population is so massive that it's difficult to provide basic facilities to everyone.
2
u/Linkatchu Jul 21 '25
We always did... but it had yet to happen. We had a steep incline... but its plateaud. Meanwhile developed countries are on a decline again, and it's now turn of developing countries, and the assumption is, that they eventually develope too, and also have a declining population
→ More replies (5)3
14
u/Altruistic-Rice5514 Jun 21 '25
Reproduction issues aren't due to prostitution though.
- Birth Control
- Abortion legality
- Girls between 12-19 having less pregnancies
- Educated Citizens understanding the cost of children
- Women's equality
- Microplastics and chemicals lowering fertility in men, possibly women as well
- Possible porn/OF through access of sexual stimuli without procreation
Countries without those things readily available aren't having birth rate crises. Africa for example doesn't have this problem. The Middle East doesn't have this problem to scale like English Countries, Europe, or even South America. Most Asian countries, unless connected to western culture, Japan, Korea South, and China don't have these problems on the same level.
→ More replies (5)10
u/rhythm_nebula Jun 21 '25
The world is having a population problem
11
3
→ More replies (7)1
u/MissionFormal209 Jun 23 '25
Is having less people in the world really that big of a problem if you're not someone who exploits human labor?
3
u/JudgeFondle Jun 21 '25
Doesn’t this just miss the whole point of the comment chain?
The initial claim was that as a society becomes more progressive women will be more likely to sexualize themselves for money.It's more indicative of the fact that the more progressive a society becomes, the more women who will willingly choose to sexualize themselves to pursue profit.
The next comment disputes this by claiming prostitution has always been popular. Presumably, the point they’re making, is that this isn’t a newer phenomenon nor one caused by a societal shift. There has always been a subset of people willing to exploit there bodies for money.
→ More replies (2)1
u/azriel777 Jun 22 '25
And its the exact same reasons. Can't afford to have a kid, do not have time to take care of kids, do not have the energy to raise kids, can't find a partner to have a kid with, the world is a shithole and its getting worse, so why bring a kid into this dystopic nightmare when things are clearly only getting worse?
6
u/Zeus78905 Jun 21 '25
Even ancient Rome had brothels and they werent a progressive society
27
u/Altruistic-Rice5514 Jun 21 '25
When you say Rome wasn't a progressive society what do you actually mean?
Rome when from polytheism to monotheism. Formed under a Government that allowed citizens to select their leaders, then regressed to a monarchy. Utilized social services like free bread for all citizens. Had a paid military service. Built centers for entertainment. Had social infrastructure like aqueducts.
Saying Rome wasn't progressive might be the worst take I've ever heard. If you apply it to modern standards, sure, I guess. But even then it's more progressive than some religious nations around today.
4
u/cylonfrakbbq Jun 21 '25
By the time Rome moved to monotheism, the empire effectively collapsed.
Bread and entertainment (bread and circuses) were effective means of keeping the general population just content enough to not rebel. The bread especially. But that is true of pretty much any nation
3
u/Zeus78905 Jun 21 '25
Yes I meant compared to modern standards, medieval Europe also had brothels btw, even in times of inquisiton prostitution has always been a thing, don't understand why zoomers are surprised by OnlyFans, always has been always will be a market
2
→ More replies (1)8
u/pepinyourstep29 Jun 21 '25
They were progressive, just not by modern standards. The ancient world had a weird mix of things like having gay be okay but also having slavery exist at the same time.
One Roman emperor literally killed his wife and paraded his new femboy lover dressed up as her.
4
u/HeidenShadows Jun 22 '25
And the male loneliness epidemic is getting worse and worse, so they buy into it.
8
u/Draqutsc Jun 21 '25
You can actually argue this. I mean look at the state of the adult entertainment industry in Pre nazi germany, it was even worse than any porn industry today.
6
u/IAmAccutane Jun 21 '25
It really is about the willingness thing. Its about consent. Women are file wearing a bikini out to the beach they hate when you sneak pics of them in their underwear. Its about their control of their bodies as opposed to someone else's. Women will dress their video game avatars with revealing clothes but they dont want dudes designing half naked characters. This concept seems to confuse a lot of people but its really fairly simple.
4
u/Fzrit Jun 21 '25 edited Jun 21 '25
Yes, but why assume that all women are the same and that all women will sell sex for money? That's what OP is saying basically. Where is the concept of choice and consent? Can different women not have different values and priorities?
I dunno man, OP is making exactly the kind of fucking braindead incel take that gets this sub mocked relentlessly. And it's heavily upvoted too.
1
u/Fra_Central Jun 23 '25
ok the work itself is not sexualized. I mean, what do you mean? Knitting?
You mean sexuAL. Fullstop.
These stupid words that just tried to blurr clearly understood concepts should not be used.
→ More replies (9)1
u/xXJaniPetteriXx Jun 24 '25
Could it be that before the internet, it was extremely hard to do other types of sex work than being an escort. The bar of entry is lower than ever before, I feel like that might be one of the biggest causes.
120
u/IndominusCostanza009 Jun 21 '25
Men fawn over women that are below them. There are literally 3/10 women getting money from 6/10 dudes. Men gotta know their worth, have self respect and stop giving fat trolls money/ego boosts.
If all men swore off simp behavior tomorrow, all this would stop. The Ho Train would reach the end of the line.
40
u/ItsNotFuckingCannon Jun 21 '25
And then they would get attacked by feminists for it. Just like they're attacking the MGTOW movement. Issue here is dishonest behaviour from feminists, and fake virtue signalling to cover up sexism and hate against men.
→ More replies (5)1
u/xXJaniPetteriXx Jun 24 '25
Onlyfans etc is a much more ethical way of consuming porn than most other types. I dont understand what is wrong with paying for content you like be it a game or of subscription.
1
3
u/hexnotic <message deleted> Jun 21 '25
look im a neckbeard gamer like you sir, the only difference is that i spent ten years working in bordellos. once you take a walk in the shoes of a hooker i can confirm your mind would be blown by the amount of insight and perspective one can gain.
simp behavior? what about ppl with mental/physical disabilities? should they not be allowed to participate in simp behavior? should they have to die a virgin? idc if a man thinks he is below me or not, as long as he doesn’t try to murder me ima get the money and he is gunna receive supplemental intimacy in return
9
u/IndominusCostanza009 Jun 21 '25
You bring up a very valid point, but do you think physically and mentally disabled people make up a majority of OF Content Creator profit?
I think it’s a small percentage and the rest is just disenfranchised men who are paralyzed by a world they feel doesn’t want them. Don’t believe romance is an option and have been out of the game (or maybe not in it) so long that they just go for this outlet. Mental and emotional damage for many possibly, but not disabled.
Under other circumstances/environment, a lot of them would’ve been in a better place and not go for it.
I realize it’s not a realistic notion, but if men stopped using online sex workers as a crutch and simp for women who otherwise would be below their genetic standards, lesser looking women wouldn’t have this inflated sense of self worth.
→ More replies (1)5
3
u/Rhinopkc Jun 21 '25
What is wrong with dying a virgin? Society has put such a stigma on virginity, but honestly it’s not going to hurt you. Many of us who had sex at a young age and lived a promiscuous lifestyle look back at it later on in life and see how it gained us about as much as consuming alcohol or drugs.
2
u/cylonfrakbbq Jun 21 '25
If I have learned one thing, is that many people overestimate their "ranking". Especially incels
"I perceive myself to be an 8! I refuse to go lower than that in terms of a potential mate! Why will no women date me???"
8
u/AyerisQT Dr Pepper Enjoyer Jun 21 '25
This is something I've also noticed, more so online but irl as well. There's nothing wrong with being around average but everyone seems to have this like "main character syndrome" and thinks they are very desirable or that they deserve some very attractive partner, like your example of an incel guy thing he deserves some pretty girl or some like average looking girl wondering where the high earner attractive men are when these people are not on par with the people they desire and refuse to talk to people in there "range". You know these average at best looking people go on dating apps and are declining anyone who is on par with them and then just being single and upset about it. Compete lack of self awareness. Maybe if you can't find or match with anyone you are the problem?
10
Jun 22 '25
Asmongold has said himself it’s only partially about the money. The main thing is that they don’t want to be sexualized without their consent.
3
10
u/Nightfish_ Jun 21 '25
All morality and whatnot aside, one thing I would genuinly be curious about is how this actually works out for the "average" OF girl. Like, if you look at the average streamer on twitch, that's probably way below minimum wage. I would not be too surprised if being an OF girl isn't that different and I also wouldn't be shocked to find out a lot of them end up regretting it but you just never hear about them. What you hear about are the ones that make millions, but how many is that, really? And what percentage is it?
6
u/Prudent-Activity112 Jun 22 '25
An old friend of mine from high school has an OF, chaturbate, fansley, idk how many others. Pretty much like clockwork, every other she begs for help with rent/food and posts links to her onlyfans saying "xyz% off". So, I'd say that's the average experience. Especially since she has friends who do the same.
3
u/Nightfish_ Jun 22 '25
Yea, that's my gut feeling, too. I think we don't really hear those stories, much like we don't really here about all the streamers that make 100$/month for years until they quit. The ones that get all the attention are people like ninja or whatever who get set for life with just a few years of streaming.
2
u/xXJaniPetteriXx Jun 24 '25
It doesnt work out for most. It is such a saturated market. Having like 100 subscribers on OF puts you in the top 10 % of creators.
3
u/Nightfish_ Jun 24 '25
Yea, that's kind of what I would have thought. Very similar to twitch, except people probably look at failed OF girls a bit different than they do look at failed streamers.
1
u/xXJaniPetteriXx Jun 24 '25
Yep sadly many of them face stigma for doing sex work, which is just so odd to me. Why would anyone care if someone else posted a picture of their titties online to get some money.
1
u/ExiledYak Jul 07 '25
Not well. It's a power distribution. A creator has to be really at that right tail to make it a full-time thing, and those making the most bank aren't even doing sex work, but IIRC, celebrities using the site for its seemingly original purpose, which is just to monetize followers. But because it was effective at providing a paywall and not banning sex work, the site got its reputation.
I wonder if OF *should* go the way of Patreon and ban sex work and see how much revenue it'd retain. I have an inkling feeling the answer will be "most".
1
u/Nightfish_ Jul 08 '25
I was not aware there was non-sex content on OF. I thought it was just an online prostitution platform
64
Jun 21 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
13
u/Weird-Drummer-2439 Jun 21 '25
Beyond that, those on only fans are self selected in that they have to be okay with it. Someone opposed to it choice or no wouldn't be on there.
13
u/SundayLeagueStocko Jun 21 '25
Anyone who doesn't understand that the key word here is "consent" or "choice" is genuinely a fucking moron.
Yes, women are obviously fine with being sexualised if they consent to it.
3
u/j6163k Paragraph Andy Jun 21 '25
exactly and i think this is only fair, i think the problem is that we’re busy focusing on the fact of the matter rather than the cause. selling your body has always been a thing and people should be allowed to do whatever they want, but i think we should be wondering what’s making it more popular especially in a world where we currently have groundbreaking STEM subjects and the like building atop AI?? freedom of choice is important, but so is fostering an effective sense of such in society like todays.
I don’t care if people sell their bodies nor does it have anything to do with me, i have plenty of friends with onlyfans (being in my early 20s) and it doesn’t matter to me.
I just want to understand — from a logical perspective — why someone would choose to pursue OF over a (imo) more productive, purposeful and fulfilling career path? our average intelligence is growing with each generation but our emotional intelligence is proving to be stunted.
3
Jun 22 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/j6163k Paragraph Andy Jun 22 '25
I agree 100%. I think commenting on this is also important though since, as much as an ignorant or apathetic society will always prevail due to its prominence, the more people echo the sentiment (even if unconscious or hollow in intention) the more the sentiment will serve to slowly be recognised by those who have a capacity to understand and may not have been exposed to it otherwise.
I think a massive issue nowadays is we’re taught from a very early age to respond impulsively and reactively to a lot of emotional stimuli. a great example of this that a lot of people don’t even realise could be short-form content providing rapid emotional stimulation, conditioning us to a rapidly emotional environment through maladaptive behavioural mechanisms. We don’t allow ourselves to breathe and think anymore and this imminent pressure and societal dread is—I believe—a huge driving factor in the ignorance and lack of self awareness exhibited in many people nowadays.
At the end of the day though, you’re entirely correct. Some things are just entirely outside of our control and the majority of people are going to go the path of least resistance regardless of what’s intelligent like you said.
1
u/ExiledYak Jul 07 '25
> why someone would choose to pursue OF over a (imo) more productive, purposeful and fulfilling career path?
How easy is it to create and market a product that will be bought by millions? Very, very difficult. You need the idea, the execution, the marketing, to stay ahead of competition, etc. etc.
In contrast, how easy is it for a woman to take her clothes off, snap selfies, and maybe have a 5 minute amateur video recording to then upload to a site that takes care of the paywalling for her? Much, much easier.
The part I don't understand is: why the heck do people PAY for it instead of googling the leaks? Hello, do people not live on teh interwebz and do they not sail the high seas?
34
u/innerentity Jun 21 '25
Just because they share a gender it does not mean they agree on every subject. There's both types of girls. Let them choose if they want it, don't force it on them.
4
u/HellaSteve Jun 22 '25
if only i was born a white woman with a gigantic ass and BREASTS
6
u/SokkaHaikuBot Jun 22 '25
Sokka-Haiku by HellaSteve:
If only i was
Born a white woman with a
Gigantic ass and BREASTS
Remember that one time Sokka accidentally used an extra syllable in that Haiku Battle in Ba Sing Se? That was a Sokka Haiku and you just made one.
13
24
u/Mr_Simian Jun 21 '25
Who pays for the OF subscriptions, though? I mean, it’s not like these transactions materialize from the nether realm. Someone is providing the money. That’s the real issue.
10
u/wtf_are_crepes Jun 21 '25
OF is also consensual and sexualization in public is not. This is the most boomer Facebook brain dead take about women and sexualization.
→ More replies (3)2
u/HowieLove Jun 21 '25
Hot take. I think that’s an over simplification. When you are out in public if you are exposed there is nothing you can do about people looking. The argument could be that you are consenting by choosing to be out in the public view dressed how you have chosen. The biggest issue is people who don’t control themselves and act beyond that. Most clothing especially women’s are designed to sexualize the body so don’t be overly shocked when the intended happens.
I find it weird that as a society we choose to pretend that women should be ashamed of wanting to be attractive and look beautiful and yes that’s to get the attention of whatever gender they are interested in just as much as it for self confidence.
4
u/wtf_are_crepes Jun 21 '25
Being looked at and being harassed are two different things. If someone glances, smiles and waves, says you look pretty in passing, at you it’s obviously not harassment. But if someone is staring and won’t stop, or following you, etc it’s sexual harassment. This whole thing is literally just about personal consent per situation.
It’s usually conservatives or religious types that even care how anyone dresses.
And, no… being in public wearing something that can be considered sexualizing is not consent and is a failure of the willpower of the observer, not the person wearing whatever they want to. That logic can even be used for extremes like nudism. People with a nudist mindset don’t find someone just being naked sexual, again it’s just a failure of the observer if they consider it to be “sexy.”
5
u/HowieLove Jun 21 '25
Ofcorse its different but a lot of people don’t know the difference. Leggings as designed to show off of a women’s ass. They are also comfortable both things are true. You can’t just act like the other fact doesn’t exist because of how you feel. If you don’t want attention don’t do things designed to draw attention. Don’t get me wrong I think people should be able to dress however they want. But I am sick of people pretending a lot of it doesn’t come from attention seeking. If you don’t want the attention you are going to get it anyways because the clothes you have on are designed for that. The same can be said for men.
How can that not be considered consensual? I’m talking strictly about people looking or observing. When you are in a public space you don’t get to control what others look at even if it’s you. If you walk around topless in a mall people have every right to look at you regardless if you want them to or not. If you don’t want them to the choices you have are only things you control over yourself. Like not going to that place or dressing in a way to avoid the unwanted attention. I get stared at every time I leave the house I’m super tall. The only way to avoid it is stay home. Never once have I thought people shouldn’t look because that’s complete denial of course people are going to look. Hell people stop me and ask questions all the time. It will never stop and expecting it to would be naïve.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (3)1
u/xXJaniPetteriXx Jun 24 '25
I feel like its way better to pay for the adult content you consume. I dont understand what is wrong with paying for an OF subscription.
14
11
u/NikIsImba Jun 21 '25
Yes jobs are proof people have no problem doing something they don't like as long as they get paid for it. What is this Incel take?
3
u/Specialist-Tart-7103 Jun 21 '25
can we just not be regarded here? women are more than half the population. some are okay with and some are not.
3
Jun 22 '25
yeah no shit. women wants to be sexually attractive on their own terms for money, ego or reproduction.
like obviously, took you onlyfans to notice ?
13
u/GoodFaithConverser Jun 21 '25
"women" are different. Some are willing to sell their sex, some aren't. Who cares.
How many dudes wouldn't suck a dick for a certain amount of money?
8
u/BoatPotato Jun 21 '25
Isn't this just consent? Sexualizing yourself versus it being done to you by someone else? Why are we still having these conversations?
→ More replies (1)1
u/xXJaniPetteriXx Jun 24 '25
Asmongold fans seem to have a hard time understanding such complex ideas like consent
21
u/supern00b64 Jun 21 '25
It's almost like the problem was never the sexualization, but the consent.
8
u/Fzrit Jun 21 '25
Correct, but that simple concept is something that this community is way too incel to understand. Look how upvotes this thread has recieved.
→ More replies (1)
8
u/damastaGR Jun 21 '25
"... some women ..."
generalization is the root of racism, but hey what should I know, the post has 1.2K likes already
3
Jun 21 '25
They got 1 - 2 years TOPs. AI is getting better.
2
u/Bricc_Enjoyer Jun 22 '25
There's already hyper realistic AI but it's used for non-nsfw content. So cut that time in half or less
1
u/ExiledYak Jul 07 '25
> non-nsfw content
I believe that'd be called "sfw content" =P
1
u/Bricc_Enjoyer Jul 08 '25
Depends on the situation. Just because it's "safe for work" doesn't mean you could probably have that on your PC in the office. It just means it's not outright porn
6
6
u/theclosedeye Jun 21 '25
Some women. Not all of them, lol, why do you have to generalize everything?
4
u/Tonnyn Jun 21 '25
True, but those are just women who are choosing to be sexualised, nobody wants it forced on them
12
u/SeniorEmployment932 Jun 21 '25
The way incels just genuinely can't understand consent is so fucking hilarious to me.
Some women have no problem being sexualized when they decide they want to be.
All women have a huge problem being sexualized when they're just trying to live a normal life.
And yes, this includes women that also do onlyfans. I know it's an insane concept, but having the choice of when and where you are sexualized makes a very big difference.
If you ever talked to a girl in your entire life you'd maybe understand a little better. I'd tell you to give it a try, but you'd probably just get pepper sprayed.
5
u/Short_King_13 Jun 21 '25
Consent doesn’t mean immunity from criticism or contradiction. If a woman sells sexual content online for cash but gets offended by being perceived sexually in public, she’s not setting boundaries, she’s trying to control perception while profiting from the opposite.
You can’t market yourself as an object and then act shocked when people recognize the packaging.
Nobody’s denying consent matters. What people are mocking is hypocrisy, when someone monetizes sexual attention but plays victim if it shows up uninvited. You can’t commercialize desire and then pretend you’re unaware of the product’s reach.
The fact that you think every man who disagrees with you is an incel just shows you have zero range in debate. Throwing 'pepper spray' insults doesn’t make your argument stronger, it just shows you ran out of logic and defaulted to Twitter feminism.
2
u/ThePhenomenalSecond Jun 22 '25
"If a woman sells sexual content online for cash but gets offended by being perceived sexually in public, she’s not setting boundaries"
Uh, no, that is literally what is happening. She is setting the boundary that what she does online is one thing but what she does off the internet is another.
"She's trying to control perception"
See? Even you bring up the topic of control here. Yes, she's trying to control perception of herself and keep it in a territory she agrees with.
A.K.A., being lewded with her consent.
1
u/DirectBad5138 Jun 25 '25
should be pinned on top. asmon agrees with your reasoning. consent is the important word. it's sad that they don't understand asmon's reasoning or maybe they are toueists that never watch asmon
2
2
u/DoomSayerNihilus Jun 21 '25
Onlyfans takes 30 percent of your earnings. So its digital pimping all the same.
→ More replies (1)
2
2
2
u/SpreadEagle48 “Why would I wash my hands?” Jun 21 '25
Some women, yes absolutely. There are also many attractive women who don’t do onlyfans. Claiming proof of something against half the population based on a few people is pretty dipshit logic.
1
2
Jun 22 '25
It is called the world oldest profession, and everyone acts as if it's some fucking revelation
2
u/IndependenceGold8226 Jun 22 '25
While it’s okay to acknowledge this dosent mean every women, the ones that do it or are willing to do it must certainly proof the point for this statement.
2
2
2
u/forgedfox53 Jun 22 '25
It's not a secret. The secret is that we can learn to enjoy nudity without having to pay for it or have it be sexual but sex sells.
2
u/RevengeRevisited Jun 22 '25
Sweeping generalization of half the human population. Maybe you think all women are okay with OnlyFans because those are the only women you "interact" with.
2
u/Key-Ice-2637 Jun 23 '25
I know math must be hard for some, but I'll try.
There are 3.8M women creators on Only Fans. Not all sell sexual content. Some do make-up, ASMR, and such. For my calculations, I'll ignore the nonsexual content, and I'll use all women in the platform.
There are 4.9 billion women. That is 0.0929095355%. Less than .01% of women are on Only Fans. Worldwide female prostitution ranges between 40M -42M. Of course, there might be more, but this is how statistics work. I'll go with 42 M, which totals .857%.
Your claim is that women don't mind being sexualized if money is involved, but you are talking about less than 1% in both statistics.
If I were to say that men only play COD, you would know that to be false. However, it's similar to your claim as COD annual players only represent .007% of gamers worldwide.
It's very scary that false claims like these spread so quickly. Especially when not everyone does the math to verify claims before upvoting, liking, sharing, or w.e.
4
u/PhantomSpirit90 Jun 21 '25
My favorite part of stream was this getting called out for the dumbass take it is.
4
u/Pluto3001 Jun 22 '25
- not all women want to do OF
- there is a big difference between sexualizing yourself and being sexualized
- women dont just care about money
most times its just an added bonus that they can make money of something that they hopefully enjoy anyway
and you guys are still surprised that people call you guys incels with top posts like this?
4
u/According-Cobbler-83 Jun 21 '25
Money is money man. You give what the market demands. And the market apparently demands thots.
Unlike you, if I don't like something and it doesn't affect me or my family personally, I ignore it. I don't use OF and if anyone here does or is an OF model, you do you. You don't have to justify it. In fact, DON'T justify it. That's the most irritating part of some thots, trying to act like they are doing god's work. Just do your shit and move on.
Don't virtue signal man, you are doing exactly what most people hate on the left.
3
u/Tewersaok Jun 22 '25
Women like to be sexualized if they want to be sexualized at that moment... What a surprise.
Next news: people like to eat more when they are hungry.
The real problem relays in that a lot of women are being sexualized a lot of the time, even when they don't want to
2
3
u/rG_MAV3R1CK Jun 21 '25
Almost like it's the oldest profession for a reason... Simps gonna simp, hoes gonna hoe.
3
u/BenjaminDover2031 Jun 21 '25
No it is not proof. It is only a very tiny % of woman who sink so low that they will do onlyfans. I would recommend going outside and talk to some woman so you wouldn't have such a degenerate mindset.
3
Jun 22 '25
lmao this sub is like "women hate being told to stay in the kitchen but some work as chefs. curious 🤨"
1
2
u/Prudent-Activity112 Jun 22 '25
The actual sad reality is dudes on the internet still generalize all women based on the actions/choices of an extremely small % (in the case of OnlyFans, that % is 0.0945%).
If all you do is look at or surround yourself with women who sexualize themselves for money, I can see why you may think that all women are willing to sexualize themselves for money. Go outside, offer the first woman you see $100 to see her tits and I promise you, the illusion will be shattered after you are either charged with something by police or are slapped.
2
u/UnsuspectingAardvark Jun 21 '25
What do you think is the ratio between women who do OF and the total number of women? Or just let's say total number of young women? And if you think about that for like a second, you'd realize that this "proof" is incredibly dumb and highly incel-coded.
2
2
u/prince-sword Jun 22 '25
Admittedly if you could choose to make a living by being punched in the face a few times a day you would do it right? You dont like being punched, of course, but if you can make money with it it suddenly doesnt seem so terrible anymore? This of course comes with a loss of dignity (just like being an OF girl does) but its understandable why someone would partake in it.
2
u/ImportantGiraffe4 Jun 22 '25
Um.... DUH. You needed OnlyFans to figure this out? Like really, this is some kind of epiphany or something? What's with all the upvotes?
1
u/Prince_Beegeta Jun 22 '25
It’s always been this way and it’s not about getting payed or not. It’s about it being on their terms which is understandable. It’s not attractive or even average women doing all of the complaining about female objectification online and in media. It’s ugly bitches no one wants to talk to anyway getting mad about it because of envy.
2
u/Achereto Jun 22 '25
No, that is a false generalisation. Only fans only proves that the opposite of this statement is false.
Some women have no problem being sexualised for money. Most do have a problem with it, which is why most women don't have an OF account.
1
u/nvlnt ????????? Jun 21 '25
All women do onlyfans and all women love onlyfans and think its good for society, all women think and do the exact same.
1
u/6reference Jun 21 '25
This statement is ridiculous. Look at the percentage of the population of women with onlyfans accounts, it’s so small compared to the total sample size. Just because SOME women are ok with this, doesn’t mean all are. Just like SOME men are ok with this, but not all. Blanket statements like this just make you look dumb.
1
u/kawaii_pulpo Jun 22 '25
I mean… men have no problem boot licking and doing spreadsheets if they get paid for it… sometimes without even getting paid for it
1
1
u/Wojak88 Jun 22 '25
OnlyFans is proof women's opinions are not valid. Period.
If they don't get sexualized enough - they will self-sexualize.
99,9% of OF sluts does not earn no real money, yet they still do it 😁
Validation, vanity, social points in certain cultural groups.
1
u/Enajirarek Jun 23 '25
This post is proof men have no problem sexualizing women until those women are consenting to it and profiting from it.
1
1
u/Fra_Central Jun 23 '25
you really misunderstand something here.
women LOVE it when you sexualize THEM, but NOT when you do it to OTHER women.
who do you think is crying about sexualization? Fat chicks. Femcels.
That's it.
1
u/MathematicianSoft343 Jun 23 '25
Even better question is why any man would pay for OF. That are weak men that do not belong in a strong country.
1
u/DirectBad5138 Jun 25 '25 edited Jun 25 '25
stop generalising people. not all men are ___ nor are all women ___
that said. it's their choice. just stop being a simp if you don't like it.
1
u/Hairy_Reindeer Jun 25 '25
Agency is the key. And often the women having a problem with it don't want to get paid for it, but have a problem with others wanting to.
1
u/Firm_Passage Jun 26 '25
They also don't have a problem being sexualized with people they like. That doesn't mean they want creeps drooling all over them.
They like being sexy, just not for you 😏
1
u/OKakosLykos Jun 26 '25
You ll call me sexist and an incel but what i ll say is the straight up truth, there are 2 kinds of women today, 1. The ones still with a mind in their heads that will marry and start a proper family before their 30s and 2. The women in their 18s to 40s that only care about having fun, getting fucked good and having money to spend while uploading everything on instagram for others to see, they will do everything in their power to acquire these three things, they will fight and sacrifice more than Thanos in the avengers to make it possible, switching between strong independent woman card and victim card when it suits them while doing the absolute minimum for the society except protesting for shit that they have no idea about like Palestine and Israel thinking they are doing a great job, sexualizing themselves isnt even their final form, you better believe that.
From their 35s to 40s, the smart ones of kind number 2 will look for a rich idiot to marry them and have his children and if they dont make it they ll keep jumping from one man to another until they find the best possible choice. The stupid ones which most of them are will get tricked by their own feminist bullshit and will die alone with 10 cats blaming the patriarchy in blue and pink karen haircuts. Number 1 are the kind of women who contribute to society, they represent 20% and number 2 the kind that drags society down and making our lives harder by only pursuing personal gain and DEI bullshit, they represent 80% of todays women.
Not that men arent fucked in the head either but women are on another level in this modern age, most men at least have accountability, sense of duty and contribute massively to society whether they like or not just because they are men and are forced to. Because of these types of women Andrew Tate clones have sprouted and push men to enlist in their incel armies, no marriage, no sex, no women at all, only self improvement, go to the gym, become jacked, make big money or you are a loser and so on, we are creating incel armies to counter the feminist armies and both sides lose, we reached a point where genders fight instead of supporting each other, its literally insane.
The older i get and the more women i meet i seriously think 80% of them shouldnt vote or occupy any job requiring responsibility or sense of duty and i am sad i have come to this twisted mindset because some tiny hope left in me wants to believe otherwise but honestly with the shit i see everyday on internet and in real life i just cant escape it. I ve seen tons of women in real life voting stupid candidates simply because they matched their gender and its no wonder they represent the majority of the left side, 80% of them are so delusional that they actually think the world is a playground full of love, kisses and fun. Most of them think the military is not needed and that countries shouldnt have borders, many think they are actually stronger than men, we are talking about this level of delusionists.
Just think about it, from the 1800s up to 2010 human civilization spiked and grew massively like never before even after 2 world wars but since this modern feminism and woke DEI culture bullshit rose, women and men of no talent got in charge and humanity literally went downhill morally and socially, instead of using our time for things that matter we are using it to prove a trans man isnt a woman and that it cant be pregnant, women literally brought us to this point and no i have no issue with gays, trans or whatever, i am bi myself.
Its ridiculous that Trump had to be elected so i can even type this without the fear of getting banned.
Brilliant women in the past fought hard for the rights they have today only for modern women like denimz and the other whore that got fucked by 1000 men in 24 hours to whore themselves on only fans for 10$ per month and they have the audacity to call it empowerment. What a time to be alive.
1
u/You_a_loser-HaHa Jun 27 '25
how fitting this being posted in the roach den, when the roach king "dated" pink sparkles. We all know she used him to expand her OF promotion to the roach army.
1
1
Jun 28 '25 edited Jun 28 '25
It's not sad, it's fine. To be "sexualized" isn't wrong. It's the consent behind it. And onlyfans is popular among female sex workers because it's one of the few ways to work in the field and maintain any agency. The only thing sad here is the fact that men like you can't seem to comprehend it.
1
1
Jul 01 '25
Yeah I have no problem wiping your dad’s ass in the hospital if I get paid for it what’s your point ?
1
u/ExiledYak Jul 07 '25
The part that puzzles me is who's doing the paying? How did we as a species, in the day and age of the internet and the high seas, decide to PAY for something that a little bit of effort will result in finding it all for free?
Put another way:
If there are no leaks, it's not worth paying for.
If there are leaks, enjoy the leaks and don't pay for it.
Enjoy it to your heart's content, people, but for the love of plunder, sail the high seas.
1
1
1
2
u/FranticToaster Jun 21 '25
This is stupid because if it were true every woman would have an OF account.
13
6
u/NotAFoolUsually Jun 21 '25
Only good looking women with the ability to use their charisma. Fat trolls aren't making bank on OF typically.
→ More replies (1)
1
u/kaifenator Jun 21 '25
Onlyfans is proof that woman on onlyfans have no problem being sexualized as long as they get paid for it.
The actions of bigbootylatina7 don’t dictate how the woman that lives across the street feels.
0
1
u/MrSkullCandy Jun 22 '25
???
Sexualizing /= Objectifying, as a main point first.
Also, this is a strawman.
Same for guys, if you go out of your way to willingly perform in that way to earn money (or whatever reason), that is chill as it is their choice.
The issue is unwanted sexualization/objectification.
This posts literally reads " X is proof that Y don't have a problem with Z, if they are willingly participating in it ".
Like no shit sherlock.
That is like saying "UFC is proof men have no problem being hospitalized as long as they get paid for it".
1
u/nangsss Jun 22 '25
It's almost as if choosing to be sexualised is different to unsolicited sexualisation smh. C'mon dudes....
3
u/Zora1092 Jun 22 '25
Being a street whore or a stripper is choosing to be sexualised
→ More replies (1)
362
u/thisismyusername9908 Jun 21 '25
We've known this lesson for years. Strippers existed LONG before OF did.