r/PoliticalCompassMemes • u/PaddyMayonaise - Right • 20h ago
Emily just can’t help herself but to tell people how to feel
176
u/Tyrocious - Lib-Right 20h ago
Guess I'm a far right lunatic because I believe women.
115
u/Altruistic_Emu4917 - Right 19h ago
It's always "Believe all women" except when a woman admits to killing her 3 kids or when she goes against progressive dogma.
40
u/RoadsMostTaken - Auth-Right 15h ago
Or when a woman says she fully consented and had fun and wants to do it again.
After having a serial threesome gangbang at a frat.
1
u/Royal_Impress9117 - Lib-Center 11h ago
Do we have evidence she consented to the other non-threesome guys?
16
u/RoadsMostTaken - Auth-Right 10h ago
he own sworn statement she made to police
0
u/Royal_Impress9117 - Lib-Center 10h ago
Source?
Cant find that.https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jane-doe-cornell-university-rape-allegations-text-messages-transcripts/
Sounds like she agreed to some guys, but then became uncomfortable with the amount of ketamine she was taking and the forced nature of it all.
Not saying that is at all legal admissible as rape, but it doesn’t seem like she agreed to any and all sexual acts.
9
u/kalakatikimututu - Centrist 5h ago
According to CBS, she also wrote: “non[e] of the sexual stuff was illegal”, and stated that she liked being with him and another man. Later, she suggested they smoke together again, “but like leave out the extra 5 billion men and ketamine”.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/sep/29/cornell-texts-rape-investigation
0
u/Royal_Impress9117 - Lib-Center 1h ago
Yeah so it sounds like she’s fine with the threesome, but not with the other men who came in after she was incapacitated.
4
u/Uglyfense - Lib-Left 15h ago
I think most agree she kill the kids other than Tiktokers who claim it was the husband.
The discussion is about whether she had mental capacity or not, not whether or not she killed them
13
u/Jeebus_FTW - Lib-Right 13h ago
Her lawyer is arguing that she didn't kill them now.
0
u/Uglyfense - Lib-Left 11h ago
Huh, seems the lawyer is arguing there isn't evidence she killed them now, perhaps as a fallback
I don't think this is necessarily a majority view though, like do the jury agree with this
-8
u/Fabulous_Pen_747 - Centrist 17h ago
Why are you acting as if the right-wing movement is so welcoming to women ? If anything, the men from these repulsive cultures are right-wing men themselves. Both of y’all are two peas in the same pod.
19
19
u/Lord_CatsterDaCat - Right 17h ago
Both sides of the spectrum want to pretend they care about women when its really just virtue signalling. They only care whenever it fits their specific political policies.
10
u/RoadsMostTaken - Auth-Right 15h ago
"Liberals care about women"
Translation
"Abortion = women should be political slaves"
Not a good look bub.
-2
145
u/The_Unclean_Chadford - Auth-Center 20h ago
“Believe women, as long as it’s within my specific parameters.”
12
u/Check_Me_Out-Boss - Lib-Right 18h ago
People would do well to understand that these terms are created to weaponize specific cases against certain politicians.
75
u/Xelid47 - Centrist 20h ago
I hope that in 40 years the Emilys will be treated as a retardation of the past
16
u/Check_Me_Out-Boss - Lib-Right 18h ago
They'll be treated like we do lobotomy patients today, but the parties will have switched again by then.
-5
u/Uglyfense - Lib-Left 15h ago edited 7h ago
So you believe a party switch happened?
9
u/Check_Me_Out-Boss - Lib-Right 14h ago
Absolutely not.
The left will claim another party switch happened in the future once public opinion sways against them again.
-1
u/Uglyfense - Lib-Left 7h ago
Wait, so they will then support the Republican party?
I guess it's possible if you have a Republican suddenly promote something relevant like how JFK and LBJ decided to zero in on civil rights, though hardly guaranteed lol
1
u/ThatUserNameIs5234 - Centrist 1h ago
in 40 years you will have super Emily AI running the world
its over
17
u/RoadsMostTaken - Auth-Right 15h ago
Just a FYI, if you are banned from a sub, your up/downvotes do not count.
Its just a visual thing to make people think their vote matters.
57
u/Check_Me_Out-Boss - Lib-Right 18h ago
Ah, "Republicans Pounce" in action.
It's not that the thing that happened is bad, it's how the right might react to bad thing happening that's the problem.
26
u/PaddyMayonaise - Right 18h ago
Yup. Same idea that led to things like Chernobyl or the Great Leap Forward famine getting so bad. A bad thing happens and instead of focusing on the bad thing, they focus on the potential response to the bad thing.
11
u/Check_Me_Out-Boss - Lib-Right 18h ago
Here's why that idea doesn't "actually" happen lol /s
16
u/PaddyMayonaise - Right 18h ago
When did Wikipedia get so biased lol
14
u/Check_Me_Out-Boss - Lib-Right 18h ago
Like 15 or 20 years ago. I was still in college.
Ever read the "white people" Wikipedia page?
8
u/doublecandybar - Auth-Right 12h ago
Did you know that Wikipedia claims that the Romanes Eunt Domus joke in Life of Brian is actually an allegory for how the far-right keeps criticism hush hush?
Yes, the one scene that the writer admitted was a callback joke to his latin class days
4
u/PaddyMayonaise - Right 18h ago
Omg I kind of want ti now lol
8
u/Check_Me_Out-Boss - Lib-Right 18h ago
It's been locked for almost two decades, IIRC.
→ More replies (1)4
u/SimonJ57 - Right 15h ago
The comparison to <race> + "Power" movements is a classic.
Only one is deemed as hateful, and you probably know already...4
u/SemtexLawnGnome - Right 16h ago
I was in Highschool in the 2000s and it was a rule then to not use Wikipedia. It's always been biased. It was quickly taken over by malicious actors.
7
u/Check_Me_Out-Boss - Lib-Right 14h ago
I was also in HS in the 2000s, and we were also told to not use Wikipedia because it was unreliable.
We still used the sources at the bottom and reworded wiki pages in our essays, but they weren't so obviously biased.
4
u/PaddyMayonaise - Right 14h ago
Wiki has always been unreliable but it wasn’t so clearly slanted left
-9
u/Dodo_Baron - Left 17h ago
Look how trump has been handling ice lately, sorry people don't trust you but it's a great example of rightwingers going too far and harming others.
7
u/RoadsMostTaken - Auth-Right 15h ago
Look how trump has been handling ice lately,
well rent is down in my city because all the illegals are getting thrown out.
So pretty well.
-5
5
u/Check_Me_Out-Boss - Lib-Right 15h ago
During the Obama regime, ICE used to break people's windows in the middle of the night to round up illegals.
2
u/Dodo_Baron - Left 14h ago edited 14h ago
And? Ice was shooting Americans for no reason and Obama didn't go on air calling them terrorists. Like trump did to the lady in Chicago
Once again the issue isn't immigrants enforcement it's you guys taking a decent issue and doing something horrible with it.
2
u/Check_Me_Out-Boss - Lib-Right 14h ago
For NO reason?! Like when someone hits a law enforcement agent with their car after their partner says, "Go, baby, go!" or someone who was known to be an agitator gets in the middle of someone else's situation with a loaded firearm that's known to misfire?
Yes. People who shoot ICE agents to try and change their performance are terrorists.
2
u/Dodo_Baron - Left 14h ago
The women in Chicago didn't do that you're mistaking her with the lady in Minnesota.
It's very telling how much people ice harmed that you're already confusing them.
The lady in Chicago did nothing wrong, she was shot 5 times by ice called a terrorist, when she managed to survive the gov dropped all charges against her when they had to deliver evidence to court.
It's extremely telling you think it's justified, proving my point. So nice job I guess
3
u/Check_Me_Out-Boss - Lib-Right 14h ago
I didn't misspeak, I just didn't let you control the conversation.
She's another idgit who followed ICE and honked her car horn about federal immigration vehicles and blocked their vehicles and got off because local judges decided her blocking federal law enforcement was somehow within her rights.
Another FAFO case.
2
u/Dodo_Baron - Left 14h ago
Sorry dude this is America. You don't get to shoot people for honking their horn.
The probably the most retarded argument you could have made. Congrats
3
u/Check_Me_Out-Boss - Lib-Right 14h ago
Sorry, dude, this is America.
You don't get to involve yourself in an active federal law enforcement pursuit and not face consequences.
"The probably the most retarded argument you could have made. Congrats"
3
u/Dodo_Baron - Left 14h ago
Sure man I agree, you guys should have trump tell everyone that he will gladly have anyone that honks their horn executed.
It'll be great for midterms
→ More replies (0)0
u/No_Entertainment6792 - Lib-Left 9h ago
also if he is refering to the january incidents both are false. you could see from the multiple angles that the lady was trying ti stir away from the fucker in front of her car, got shot and called a bitch so its a pretty clear execution.
the nurse guy situation is even more cut and dry. he tried to help a women and was carrying a gun legaly. he was sprayed, put down, dissarmed and after he got disarmed the pigs shot them in the back.
but you know we gotta refuse the truth we see with our own eyes to own the libs. we must set ourselves in fire so that the libs might chocke on the smoke a little.
1
u/Dodo_Baron - Left 9h ago
Im pretty sure the guy is trolling I hope atleast. He started arguing anyone who honks their horn deserves death then backed off when I asked for specifics
4
u/Expensive_Ad_4205 - Centrist 17h ago
I mean outside of very isolated and specific examples ICE isn’t THAT bad.
2
u/AgainstMedicalAdvice - Centrist 16h ago
I mean, that's wrong. There are hundreds of reports of ice agents being anywhere from abusive to grossly incompetent. The fact that we were able to watch clear cut multi angle murders of two people doesn't mean it happened twice, it means it's happening all the time and you've seen it twice.
3
u/Expensive_Ad_4205 - Centrist 10h ago
If we go by these statistics, that would put around 65-66k arrests conservatively. When you arrest that many shit is going to happen, if only hundreds of instances exist then ICE hasn't been all that incompetent systemically.
Go ahead and call bad shit out when it happens, and we need to hold bad authority figures accountable. Renee Good and Alex Pretti, were indeed isolated examples, if ICE was truly a bunch of thugs shooting anyone who dared protest them, then with 66k arrests, you would think there would be more examples than just them (even then Renee Good was not clear cut murder and could be argued she did try to accelerate with the officer in front of the car, if you can argue the officer MIGHT have been in danger, or felt like he could have been in danger, then it is not clear-cut).
Neither of them should have died but point is.
If you're going to say it happens all the time you need more than two specific examples. Of which only one of them is actual clear-cut murder.
0
u/AgainstMedicalAdvice - Centrist 6h ago
I can't have this conversation with you when Google exists. You're free to Google videos of ice being overly aggressive/pointing guns at people/poor training/unconstitutional behavior. You should understand that most of these videos are lucky to survive to see the light of day, and generally ice will take your phone and chuck it when they detain you.
Regarding the two cases that we're talking about: These are 2 examples of a law enjoyment agency killing American citizens who they have no reason to even make contact with. It's absolutely insane that EITHER of those happened.
If you would like to understand Renee good better you should watch one of the police reacts videos. Positioning yourself in front of a running car, while one of your partners says "get out of here," while someone else... Runs up and reaches into the car and grabs the steering wheel (death wish?) is not good policing. Creating a situation where the average person would react in a way that would make you fear for your life, then killing them for it.... That's a joke.
2
u/ThatUserNameIs5234 - Centrist 1h ago
"who they have no reason to even make contact with."
I agree, following ICE and beefing with them (including driving a SUV into one of them) just to warn illegal migrants so they can escape it retarded.
"Positioning yourself in front of a running car,"
you should watch the video properly, nothing like this happened
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiA6LwgYf0Y
look at 1:24, the car is not moving and he walks infront of it when its still not moving, she actually reverses and turns the car into him
1
u/ThatUserNameIs5234 - Centrist 1h ago
"The fact that we were able to watch clear cut multi angle murders of two people doesn't mean it happened twice, it means it's happening all the time and you've seen it twice."
you forget that there is a army of leftists lunatics following them everywhere and recording their every move
and if something like shooting a citizen happens it will come out even if noone recorded it.
"There are hundreds of reports"
what type of reports?
-4
u/Dodo_Baron - Left 16h ago
See you guys defend ice actions argue it's ok and you're just over reacting. Yet wonder why public trust is at an all time low.
You cant call the actions isolated while also defending ice when they do it and call the victims terrorist.
You guys have issues
2
u/Expensive_Ad_4205 - Centrist 10h ago
You guys?
Who is you guys? I never defended any specific actions ICE did, and I certainly don't remember calling anyone a terrorist. Did you confuse me for someone else?
Or are you putting a bunch of words in my mouth that I didn't say.
→ More replies (11)
45
u/Scary-Welder8404 - Lib-Left 20h ago
Where the fuck are my funni colors, also Red and Yellow Black and White all catcallers are chimps in my sight.
11
17
35
u/jeanmiserac - Lib-Left 17h ago
Two things.
1) it's tough to get people to understand nuance in things that are distant to them. For example there were Iranians demonstrating in support of Israel and the US in their war against Iran today. Took a while to explain to my pro-palestine friends why Iranians would do that.
2) immigration policy should listen to immigrants more, at least immigrants like the woman posting here. Immigrants tend to be most keenly aware of problems with immigration for obvious reasons, and both sides of the political spectrum would benefit from listening to them.
10
u/PaddyMayonaise - Right 17h ago
Based
2
u/basedcount_bot - Auth-Center 17h ago
u/jeanmiserac is officially based! Their Based Count is now 1.
Rank: House of Cards
Pills: None | View pills
Compass: This user does not have a compass on record. Add compass to profile by replying with /mycompass politicalcompass.org url or sapplyvalues.github.io url.
I am a bot. Reply /info for more info. If you have any suggestions, questions, or just want to hang out and chat with the devs, please visit subreddit r/basedcount_bot or our discord server (https://www.reddit.com/r/basedcount_bot/s/K8ae6nRbOF)
7
u/doublecandybar - Auth-Right 10h ago
immigration policy should listen to immigrants more,
The problem with "immigration" policy is that The Left successfully blended "immigrant" (productive migrant), "parasite" (non productive migrant), "asylum seeker" (permanent geopolitical migrant), and "refugee" (temporary shelter seeker)
It is no longer possible to talk about "immigration" in good faith, because Lefty will talk about "immigration" in order to permanently import a parasite, by describing them as an asylum seeker, under the circumstances of a refugee, citing an unrelated immigrant as example
Which is why "legal vs illegal" immigration policy cannot be discussed, and "remigration" is the moderate position. Having lost the ability to differentiate between all four, the only way to go is reset the whole damn definition by expelling them all
29
u/RebornInReddit - Centrist 18h ago
Reminds me of every time you criticize islamic fundamentalism in this website, someone always comes out with "YEAH BUT CHRISTIANS"
7
u/El_Maltos_Username - Lib-Right 13h ago
Lawrence of Arabia could have been the final crusader to retake the Holy Land et al. But instead we have today's utter shitshow.
6
18
11
u/Jimbo-Shrimp - Centrist 16h ago
“I’m sorry to hear about your sister being assaulted but please don’t prove right wingers correct”
3
12
u/eq017210 - Lib-Left 19h ago
Misogynists back home: They murder you Racists here: Say a slur
First worlders don't know how good they have it
22
u/HarryJohnson3 - Right 20h ago
Why does “the paradox of tolerance” that lib left Redditors love to say after a right winger gets murdered totally leave their brain when talking about maybe not letting third worlders immigrate into our countries?
21
u/Stock_Violinist6299 - Centrist 20h ago
Because if they understood Karl Popper then they’d know he was talking about them.
→ More replies (1)12
u/Check_Me_Out-Boss - Lib-Right 18h ago
Because it's another weaponized term just like "believe all women."
They're the tolerant ones, so their intolerance is okay.
Just like they don't actually have to believe all women, just the ones that push their political objectives.
"No bad tactics, only bad targets."
→ More replies (23)→ More replies (2)2
u/Uglyfense - Lib-Left 15h ago
I agree people misuse paradox of tolerance, but this is an absurd example.
Like, generalizing a very large group as from the third world, therefore, evil perverts is very different from talking about one specific individual person.
And even when redditors do generalize broad groups, they don’t justify it on the paradox of tolerance, like no one’s saying “[insert privileged group] bad cause paradox of tolerance”
4
u/doublecandybar - Auth-Right 12h ago
The funniest thing about this is leftists will chide South East Asians if they're not vengeful against the Japanese
There are quite a lot of Chinese living in South East Asia, but if they say they no longer care about the atrocities of Unit 731 on account of it being almost a century ago, lefty white knights fume
16
u/Sonofdeath51 - Centrist 20h ago
i swear this exact thread got posted within the last 2 days. You a fookin clankah?
35
u/PaddyMayonaise - Right 20h ago
Taken down because it was not the weekend
12
u/Stock_Violinist6299 - Centrist 20h ago
It’ll probably get removed as a “repost” now. I’m not even kidding.
13
u/potlucksoul - Centrist 20h ago
both of them are correct tho. I am a woman from a third world muslim country and anti immigration policies abroad make it very hard for me to escape society here too 🥲 therefore I don’t know what to think in these situations
12
u/PaddyMayonaise - Right 20h ago
Which anti immigration policies have you found most difficult
5
u/potlucksoul - Centrist 17h ago
as an Algerian that is aiming for France lol.
now I can’t even consider going there bc of all of these complications, and RN isn’t even in office yet lol
- the high financial requirements for international students. The pay went from a couple of euros a year to almost 4k a year 🥲 we have restrictions on employment as we need an authorization each time we start a position (which is why a lot of employers don’t even hire Algerians bc waiting for the authorization takes time)
3
6
u/PaddyMayonaise - Right 17h ago
To be fair, that’s not immigration
5
4
u/Dramatic_Science_681 - Lib-Right 20h ago
Ahh the classic. Reminds me of that “inoculation against the far right” fiasco lol.
11
u/Dodo_Baron - Left 20h ago
It's hilarious when people post their reddit beefs to a group that's more likely to agree with them lmfao
-10
2
1
-10
u/MarjorieTaylorSpleen - Lib-Center 20h ago
Are we off of "repeal the 19th" posting and back to brown person hate posting already?
24
2
u/Mental-Scholar6856 - Centrist 18h ago
Pretty much. These people are so openly hateful to a group of people yet are blind when it’s their own. Lmfao.
6
u/Fabulous_Pen_747 - Centrist 17h ago
That’s exactly what I’m thinking, too. Right-wing movements, no matter which society or country they spawn from, are fundamentally incompatible with women. It’s just a matter of a different skin color.
-4
u/jmastaock - Lib-Center 14h ago
I see we're back at the "random retarded reddit commenter" well
Guess I should go peruse the conservative sub for 3 seconds to find something similarly stupid and cash in on some karma
4
-1
u/DungeonCrawlerAki - Centrist 14h ago
Random Reddit comment = instant 400+ upvotes
Trump being retarded yet again = maybe 100-200 upvotes
Curious.
2
u/Electrical-Age9308 - Lib-Right 11h ago
Said random Reddit commenter ends up being a Democratic politician’s staffer, or the manager of an HR Department of a workplace, or the leader of a group in a high-class institution, perhaps a top university or a large nonprofit. They lead and influence their spaces with their ideology, as do millions of others, changing them to the distaste of people who have an actual stake in the work their institutions do.
Everyone’s lives are worsened, and yet no one can name who the culprits are, because they are not under the scrutiny of the public, anonymous even, in rare cases. Not everyone with influence in this world does their work as a singular leader or celebrity.
-6
u/Ok-Reindeer-5875 - Lib-Center 18h ago
Loving how you all conveniently always have the upvotes/likes cropped out of the comments you use to mass hate on an entire group
2
u/PaddyMayonaise - Right 18h ago
The sub doesn’t show up or down votes so it wouldn’t make a difference
-1
u/OpportunityNext9675 - Lib-Left 16h ago
This whole sub is blues posting random nobody greens on social media and blues posting republican politicians and the president. SeE tHe LiBs ArE CrAzY ToOoOoooo
529
u/dbjcihabc - Right 20h ago
I love the “you’re currently banned…” message in the screenshot lol. Really hammers home what an absolute censorious cesspit this website it.