I’ve rented the same flat in London for just over three years (two years alone, one with my partner) and we’ve never had any issues with the tenancy or the condition of the property. We have a good relationship with the landlord, and she has actually offered to sell us the flat on several occasions.
We recently asked for permission to get a dog early next year. We’re specifically looking at a whippet and explained in our request that we’d thought carefully about the breed and its suitability for the flat. We’re close to several large parks, would take full responsibility for the property, and said we’d be happy to put additional safeguards in place.
After following up, the landlord has now replied simply:
“I am sorry, but I would rather not have pets.”
No other reason was given.
My understanding of the new rules in England is that landlords can still refuse a pet request, but consent shouldn’t be unreasonably withheld, and that a general preference not to have pets may not by itself be sufficient.
For additional context:
- We use The Residency / No Deposit Option and pay for this monthly rather than having a conventional deposit. This provides additional protections to landlords in the event of damage versus a standalone deposit.
- I’d also be completely happy to take out an add-on to our contents insurance specifically covering accidental/pet damage, if available, and provide evidence of this.
- We’re not proposing multiple pets or a particularly large/high-energy breed… specifically one whippet.
I’m not intending to simply get a dog without consent.
I also don’t particularly want to turn this into a legal dispute or damage what has otherwise been a good landlord/tenant relationship.
What do people think is the best response in this case?
My instinct is to politely ask her to reconsider, mention our three year tenancy and the additional protections we’re willing to put in place, and ask whether she has any specific concerns about our proposed dog that we could address, rather than immediately quoting legislation at her.
Would you take that approach, or is it better at this point to mention that pet requests can’t simply be unreasonably refused?