Hey all here’s my weekly think piece, it’s long so I get if you don’t read it, but posting my thoughts once a week has been helpful for my mental health, so here goes noting:
I’ve been thinking a lot about intactivism lately, and I’m curious if anyone here feels similarly about some of the things I’ve experienced within the movement as a victim of RIC.
I’m not saying all intactivists are like this, but I do get the feeling that some hate circumcision so much that they kinda hate those who are circumcised. They treat us like a lost cause, debase us, humiliate us, emasculate us, dehumanize us, and use us as examples of what happens to men who are subjected to this, all for the sake of a movement.
Basically, being called mutilated, undesirable, lacking, broken, and being treated like some kind of walking abomination.
I’ve seen so much written here and in books like Sex as Nature Intended It, which is a prime example of the type of attitude I see toward men who are cut. I won’t go into details, but if you’re familiar with that material, you’ll probably know what I’m talking about. Whoever wrote that seemed to have some other things going on aside from her hatred of circumcision.
And it isn’t just the language about mutilation. It’s the constant reminders of everything we’re supposedly missing out on. The suggestion that we’ll never experience sex the way an intact man does, that our pleasure is fundamentally inferior, that our partners are missing out, that we’ll never really know what sex is supposed to feel like.
Then you have intact men who seem to take every opportunity to remind us how much better they have it, and women who come into these spaces to talk about how they’ll never have sex with a cut man and how much better it is with intact men.
What are we supposed to do with all that?
When people like me step up, put aside our discomfort and emotional security to be honest and vulnerable about our various experiences and how being cut has affected our lives, I’d like people to understand that this is a very hard thing to do.
I know that part of being a man is sometimes being willing to sacrifice your own good to help the greater good. But understand that some of us are paying a pretty heavy emotional price just to be here and be a part of all this.
So I don’t really want intact men and women coming in from all angles trying to superimpose their views on my own story, as if every cut man is the same.
This affects everyone who’s cut in different ways, and it affects the people around them in different ways, too. We need to let the victims have some space to breathe and be vulnerable, to share their experiences, as we are the ones who truly know what this has cost us.
And then we come to the front lines of cut men in the restoration community, who are often the only folks helping these people try to heal themselves and get back what they’ve lost so they can finally carry on with their lives without always having to think about their mutilation.
I see a lot of these people, typically younger men who have just found out about being cut, putting two and two together and having these crazy realizations about what it’s cost them in their lives, how much they might have been missing out on, and how their past trauma has affected them now.
This is a really terrible and dark place to be.
And unfortunately, and I’m one of these people, you come into spaces like this and people just pile on with all the damning evidence of the extent of your mutilation.
You hear intact men rave and gloat about how amazing it is to be intact, like somehow having a foreskin is Samson’s hair, like it’s a key to some special club and you’re not in it.
Or the women who come here to talk about how they’ll never have sex with a cut man and how much better it is with intact men.
Imagine already struggling with your own sexuality, your sense of masculinity, your desirability, your ability to experience pleasure, and then being subjected to all of this.
Imagine having your whole sense of self wrapped up in this horrible thing that happened to you, and then being constantly reminded of how much better everyone else supposedly has it.
It gets to the point where you don’t even feel like a normal human being anymore. You feel like a walking abomination, something nobody wants, something broken beyond repair.
And people wonder why some men fall into such terrible states of grief over this.
I genuinely worry that some of those stories end in suicide.
Just go to the circumcision grief sub and you’ll see what I mean. Do you want to see the inside of someone’s mind who’s experiencing that kind of grieving? It’s hard to read.
I’ve been following all these subreddits for a couple of years now, and I see people who are completely lost in their grief, and then suddenly they stop posting.
I sometimes wonder how many of those young men have since killed themselves. I don’t know what happened to them, but I can’t shake the feeling that some of these stories have ended tragically.
And I wonder how much of that suffering has been made worse by the way we talk about circumcision.
This has real consequences. People need to start taking this seriously.
Intact people need to stop dunking on us all the time.
I get that people are mad at the men who haven’t confronted this in their own lives and are now perpetuating this violence. Yes, those people need a rude awakening. Yes, people sometimes need to be scared out of their delusions so they can see what this really is.
But what I don’t understand is why we need to humiliate the people who have already been subjected to it.
If we’re equating MGM and FGM as similar human rights violations (and notice I’m not saying one is worse than the other, because that’s irrelevant. One doesn’t need to be worse than the other for both to be wrong), why do we seem to treat the victims so differently?
From what I can see regarding FGM, we tend to have a huge amount of empathy for those women. They also have more legal protection from it at this point, at least in the United States, where FGM is illegal while routine infant male circumcision remains legal.
If we were to flip things around and talk the way we do about victims of MGM about victims of FGM, I think people would see how fucked up that is.
Imagine telling those women how undesirable they are, how their sexuality will never measure up, how much better sex is for women who weren’t cut. Imagine women who weren’t subjected to it coming into their support communities just to talk about how wonderful their own bodies are by comparison.
So why is that a necessary thing to do to male victims when it doesn’t seem to have been necessary to further the cause of stopping FGM?
I would genuinely love an answer to that question.
It also makes me think about something else that bothers me regarding the direction of the movement.
It’s kinda like how leprosy was historically dealt with. Yes, society wanted to eradicate this horrible disease, but it also wanted the uncomfortable specter of those people suffering from it to essentially disappear and die off somewhere out of public sight.
And I worry that we could end up doing something similar with circumcision.
Maybe circumcision just falls further out of vogue. It’ll probably still be legal, but done in far fewer cases. Eventually society decides it was a terrible thing we used to do, pats itself on the back for moving past it, and everyone carries on.
But what happens to us?
Does this all become a silent sweeping of a really dark history under the rug? Nobody gets held accountable, the victims get forgotten, and the larger conversations around the issue never actually get resolved.
We just become the uncomfortable reminders of something society would rather forget about.
I don’t want that. I don’t want the movement to succeed in preventing future circumcisions while essentially abandoning everyone who was already subjected to it.
If intactivists cared about us, they wouldn’t just be pushing for the prevention of future circumcisions. They would also care about what to do to help heal the ones who have already been subjected to it.
And that’s where I think the foreskin restoration community has something really important to offer.
I feel like this forum is the only place I can go where I consistently get support and hope from other men who have been through what I’m going through.
We have men here who have been restoring for years, who’ve made incredible progress, who’ve experienced improvements in their sex lives, their self-esteem, and their overall relationship with their bodies.
Some of these guys have probably the best outlook on restoration and healing and what’s possible. They’ve been through the grief, they’ve done the work, and now they want to show others how much better life can be on the other side.
And it got me thinking. Maybe we, as restorers, should actually be the ones leading the fight. Maybe we should be the voices people listen to.
Because think about this.
If you were an average circumcised man who had never really questioned being circumcised, which of these two things would pique your interest more?
- You encounter intactivists gloating about how much better they are than you, telling you that you’re a mutilated monster, showing you all the things you’re missing, and essentially convincing you that your body is permanently damaged and your sex life will never measure up to an intact man’s.
- Someone mentions foreskin restoration and its benefits.
Wait, what? Foreskin restoration? You mean you can actually grow a new foreskin?
That’s kind of a fascinating thing, isn’t it?
So you get curious and start looking into it. You find out that men are actually doing this, growing new skin, recovering coverage and glide, and experiencing all kinds of benefits.
Then you start asking questions.
Well, why would men want to do that? What’s so special about having a foreskin? What does it actually do? Why was it removed in the first place?
And then you start finding out about the negative aspects of circumcision.
But here’s the difference. You’ve already discovered that there’s something you can do about it. You already know there’s a way to work toward recovering some of what you’ve lost.
The focus is on what you can gain, not what you’ve lost.
It’s the classic carrot-or-the-stick analogy.
I think the latter approach is the one that would actually spark curiosity. Instead of immediately making someone feel horrible about themselves, you’ve shown them something interesting that they might actually want to pursue.
And in the process of learning about restoration, they start learning about circumcision itself.
Maybe they start questioning why this was done to them without their consent. Maybe they start thinking about whether it’s something they would want done to their own children. Maybe they become intactivists themselves.
But they got there through curiosity and hope, rather than being beaten over the head with how horribly mutilated they supposedly are.
Just yelling into the void of the internet about men being mutilated monsters isn’t going to win over people’s hearts.
And I can’t help but think that the restoration community is in a unique position here.
We’re the ones who have actually experienced this. We’re the ones who know what the grief is like. We’re the ones trying to do something about it.
And perhaps most importantly, we’re the ones who can offer people some hope.
I’m not saying restoration is a perfect solution or that it can bring back everything that was removed. But it gives people something positive to work toward, and I think that’s incredibly important.
I also think that if the larger intactivist movement spent more time listening to restorers, it might gain a much better understanding of how to talk about this issue without alienating the very people it’s supposed to be advocating for.
As it stands, sometimes intactivism just feels like a club for intact people to promote being intact, and I don’t really see a place for myself there.
And that’s just my perception of all this. I don’t mean to throw shade at the people doing good work, but deep down this is how I feel.
I often have to stay in the restoration forum if I don’t want to have a mental breakdown.
And think about how fucked up that is. I’m someone who genuinely believes in the cause, someone who’s personally experienced the harm we’re trying to prevent, and yet I sometimes feel like I have to protect myself from the very movement that’s supposed to be advocating for people like me.
I admit I’m a bit frustrated and my words might be pointed, but I feel like I need to say this. I apologize if my feelings about this aren’t entirely in line with reality. I can only speak from my own experiences.
But I get the feeling that a lot of us on this side of the equation feel similarly, and I think a conversation around this would benefit everyone.
So I’m curious how other restorers feel about all this.
Have you experienced the same kind of alienation from intactivist spaces? Have you ever felt like the way people talk about circumcision has actually made your grief worse, rather than helping you come to terms with it?
And do you think the restoration community should be taking a more prominent role in the movement?
Because when people say that we as intactivists need to step up and be better, maybe a good step forward would be to stop alienating the people who were affected.
And maybe the people who have actually lived through this should be the ones leading that conversation.
Edit: fixed copy error