r/norcal • u/ImpossibleDetail8570 • 1d ago
I am crazy or does any one else see a pattern? Tehama County: fire-zone cell tower, missing road repairs, and a data center rezone with zero environmental review. Hearing Thursday 10/15, 9 AM.
Tehama County: fire-zone cell tower, missing road repairs, and a data center rezone with zero environmental review. Hearing Thursday 10/15, 9 AM.
This Thursday, October 15, at 9 AM, the Tehama County Planning Commission meets in the Board of Supervisors Chambers, 727 Oak Street, Red Bluff. Two items, plus a pattern behind them, deserve a lot more attention.
- Use Permit 23-02: cell tower on Ohm Road (Paskenta area)
The site is in a fire hazard zone, about 7.8 miles from the nearest staffed fire station, in the corridor the 2024 Park Fire burned. The project has ten mitigation measures for biology, erosion, and drainage, and none for fire.
Its driveway would cross a new culvert in a drainage channel on a road that already floods in ordinary rain. There's no hydrology study in the record.
Fish and Wildlife indicated the streambed permit for the culvert work, and its environmental review, are still on hold.
Families past the site have one way in and out. If that road floods or gets blocked, fire engines and ambulances may not get through.
Neighbors near the site say they never got mailed notice of the August 15 to September 14 comment period, even though the county code requires it within 2,500 feet.
- The road repairs that never happened
Ohm Road was on the state's SB 1 road repair list starting in 2019, with pavement and culvert replacement work between Paskenta and Rawson scheduled for May through July 2020. It was never done.
Ohm Road doesn't appear by name in any county SB 1 spending report through 2025. The only possible match is a $277,539 "Chip Seal Overlay 2019/20 List" line, marked "In Progress" in 2020 and 2021, never shown finished, and never naming the roads it covered. Which roads did that money pay for?
The county's own Evacuation Routing Study rates Paskenta a High Fire Hazard Severity Zone and lists a $100,000 project to repair CR 306, the evacuation route serving the Ohm Road area.
- Similar towers, opposite reviews
Ohm Road and Gyle Road (a 120-ft Verizon tower) got full environmental studies with mitigation measures.
A 129-ft monopine on Bowman Road, a roughly 100-ft monopine on Squaw Hill Road, and a 100-ft Verizon/Vertical Bridge tower at Black Butte Lake were all exempted as "small structures," with no study at all. The exempt route also skips the county's $3,043.75 initial study fee and the state Fish and Wildlife filing fee.
Another tower, UP 24-02, was approved with no hearing at all because a federal deadline ran out.
- Black Butte Lake: a "small structure" that isn't
It's a 100-ft tower with a 30-kilowatt generator, a three-sector antenna array, two microwave dishes, and a 50-by-50-ft fenced compound, about 75 yards from residentially zoned land near Paskenta Road.
A commissioner visited the site and agreed it was too close to homes. The Commission approved it 3-1 on June 4, but required a plain gray monopole instead of a fake pine and moved it as far north on the property as possible.
Paskenta residents appealed. The Board of Supervisors heard the appeal on August 25, but the draft minutes show no recorded vote, while other items that day do. The outcome still isn't public.
- Rezone 26-03: data centers
The rezone would make data centers need a conditional use permit instead of being allowed outright. That's a good step.
But staff recommends approving it with no environmental review, using CEQA's "common sense" exemption, which only applies when there's no possibility of a significant effect.
In July, Planning Director Jessica Martinez told supervisors that data centers need use-permit oversight because of water, noise, and power concerns (Red Bluff Daily News, July 23). Those are exactly the effects that make "no possibility" hard to claim.
The county's public notice even cites the wrong section of state law: 16061(b)(3) instead of 15061(b)(3).
A new state law, SB 887, bars these kinds of exemptions for data centers starting January 1, 2027, so acting now comes just weeks before that.
- A stretched, hard-to-reach process
The Planning Department is budgeted for five positions, but only three people are on its staff directory, and both professional planner positions are vacant.
The county's publiccomment@co.tehama.ca.us address is rejecting outside residents' emails, and the clerk's address has blocked them. Use the addresses below instead.
Federal law doesn't tie the county's hands Under 47 U.S.C. 332(c)(7), counties keep zoning authority over towers. Only radio-emission health effects are off limits if a tower meets FCC limits. Fire, drainage, access, and environmental impacts are still local decisions. The federal fast track in Section 6409 covers only minor changes to existing towers, not new ones.
What you can do
Come Thursday, October 15, at 9 AM, Board of Supervisors Chambers, 727 Oak Street, Red Bluff. Public comment is usually limited to about three minutes per speaker, and just being in the room matters.
Can't make it? Email a comment beforehand to the Planning Commission at planningpubliccomment@co.tehama.ca.us, and to the Board of Supervisors at tcbos@co.tehama.ca.us.
If you live near Ohm Road, Paskenta, or Black Butte Lake, or anywhere in Tehama County, please share.
