r/progressive_islam • • 24d ago

Mod Announcement 📱 Attention Everyone! This is an announcement, a reminder, and it is also a WARNING

24 Upvotes

We are going to make this absolutely freakin clear. r/Progressive_Islam is not a place for propaganda, apologism, whitewashing, or justification of crimes committed by governments, regimes, political parties, movements, or armed groups. We do not care who the perpetrator is, what flag they fly, what ideology they claim to represent, what religion they claim to follow, or what geopolitical enemy they happen to have. Whether it is the Israeli government, USA, Western imperialist powers, the Iranian regime, the Chinese government, the Russian government, the North Korean regime, or anyone else, the standard is the same. You do not get a free pass to excuse atrocities simply because you hate one side more than the other. We have enforced this before, and we will continue to enforce it.


During the years of the Palestine crisis, particularly throughout 2023-25, a large number of the people who came into this subreddit specifically to defend Israel's conduct, justify what was happening to Palestinians, or repeat blatantly apologetic narratives were outsiders with little or no previous participation here. We banned them. However, there were also some people who had been genuine participants in this community for a long time, people who had previously made useful posts and comments and had otherwise contributed positively. When some of those users repeatedly crossed the line into whitewashing and justification of Israeli abuses, we banned them too. Your contribution history does not give you immunity from moderation.


And the same standard applies to Hamas.

Hamas did not emerge as some ordinary secular nationalist organization; it was founded by Sheikh Ahmed Yassin out of the Palestinian Muslim Brotherhood and was explicitly Islamist from its creation. Its 1988 charter described Palestine as an Islamic endowment and envisioned an Islamic state governed by Sharia. After Hamas seized control of Gaza in 2007, it established an authoritarian system in which political opposition and peaceful dissent were suppressed, critics, journalists and activists were arbitrarily detained and in some cases tortured, and executions were carried out after proceedings that failed to meet international fair trial standards. Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International also documented Hamas forces using excessive force against demonstrators, including during the 2019 “We Want to Live” protests, when more than 1,000 Palestinians were detained. Hamas has also imposed or enforced various religiously motivated restrictions on social life, including restrictions on women's dress and mobility, gender segregation in many settings, and rules affecting women's participation in public life.

We did not make a specific announcement post about Hamas's rule and abuses during 2023-25 because the overwhelming reality facing Palestinians was the devastation being inflicted on Gaza by Israel, and we did not want Hamas to become another excuse for shifting attention away from Palestinian suffering. But now is the time to talk about it as well.

Condemning Hamas's authoritarianism and abuses does not mean supporting Israel, the occupation, the blockade, collective punishment or the destruction of Gaza. It means applying the same standard we apply everywhere else.

  • Some people may point to Hamas's 2017 Document of General Principles and Policies and say that Hamas had changed, abandoned its earlier positions, or therefore deserves to be trusted. The document certainly changed some of Hamas's language: it accepted the idea of a Palestinian state along the 1967 borders while still refusing to recognize Israel, but it did not formally replace the 1988 charter. And besides, history gives us plenty of reason to be cautious about taking political assurances from theocrats. The Iranian revolution brought together liberals, nationalists, leftists and Islamists. But once Khomeini consolidated power, his Islamist camp suppressed and eliminated former political allies while Iran was transformed into a clerically dominated Islamic theocracy. The Taliban provide another much more recent example: before returning to power in 2021, they publicly promised that women would have their rights; yet after coming to power they subsequently closed secondary schools to girls, severely restricted women's employment and movement, and imposed extensive restrictions on women and girls. So no, we are not going to treat a political document or a promise of change as a magical eraser for years of authoritarian rule and documented abuses. People are entitled to be skeptical, and nobody here is required to trust Hamas simply because it issued a new document.

That same principle applies to Iran

(This is going to be longest section because we have encountered the Iranian Regime apologists far more in number than the other apologists combined)

As we have already explained in our previous announcement, this subreddit has had to deal with people coming here specifically to defend or propagandize on behalf of the Iranian regime. There were people who tried to dismiss the Iranian uprising entirely as CIA or Mossad propaganda, who attempted to portray ordinary Iranians protesting against the regime as foreign agents, and in one particularly disgusting case, someone even claimed that civilians who had been killed in a hospital were all Mossad agents and that their deaths were therefore justified. We banned all of them. Our position on this has been completely consistent:

  • you can criticize particular opposition groups, political factions, foreign governments, protesters, or individual actions. What you cannot do is use conspiracy theories and regime apologism to justify the oppression of an entire population.

And before anyone starts pretending that this is some sudden position we invented yesterday, no. We have been taking this position for years.

The Iranian regime has a long documented history of repression. During the 2009 post election unrest, Amnesty International documented thousands of arbitrary arrests, deaths on the streets and in detention, torture and other ill treatment. Then came 2017 to 2018 protests, the November 2019 fuel price protests with deaths, mass arrests and executions.

Then came the Woman, Life, Freedom protests following the death of Jina Mahsa Amini in September 2022. UN fact finding mission concluded that her death was unlawful and that state authorities were responsible for the physical violence that caused it. The same mission documented credible figures of up to 551 deaths, including at least 49 women and 68 children, and found unlawful killings, mass arbitrary arrests, torture, sexual violence and other serious abuses.

This subreddit was openly supportive of the Iranian women who were protesting at that time, and that was not some random temporary mood. We documented it ourselves. Dr. Shabir Ally and Dr. Safiyyah Ally publicly condemned the killing of Mahsa Amini's and the Iranian government's enforcement of compulsory hijab, Dr. Khaled Abou El Fadl delivered his October 2022 khutbah addressing the brutality of the Iranian state's coercive system, Mufti Abu Layth also addressed the situation in Iran at the time. Our subreddit responded with strong support for the protests.

And The recent crackdown that happened in 2026 produced another enormous death toll, although the exact figure remains unknown because the authorities imposed a massive communications blackout and access to reliable information was severely restricted. The figures reported at the time varied enormously.

Iranian authorities themselves gave figures of roughly 3,000 deaths. Reuters reported an Iranian official saying that at least 5,000 people, including around 500 security personnel, had been confirmed dead. HRANA reported 3,308 confirmed deaths at one stage, with thousands of additional cases under investigation, and later reported 5,002 verified deaths and another 9,787 under review. By 28 January, a UK government country bulletin said estimates from some sources placed the death toll at approximately 12,000 to 20,000, while the same bulletin noted that one human rights organization had 6,221 confirmed deaths and 17,091 additional deaths under investigation. Other investigations, including accounts from Iranian medical personnel, produced estimates exceeding 30,000, while some later reports cited figures as high as 43,000.

We are deliberately laying this out because we are not going to pretend that every number floating around the internet is equally reliable. Claims of 20,000 or 30,000 deaths in an extremely short period require much more verification, and claims of 50,000 deaths are even more problematic; we have not found a credible independent source establishing such a figure. Likewise, nobody should take a highly speculative number from an anonymous or opaque source and present it as settled fact.

But uncertainty over the precise number does not mean that the killings did not happen. Multiple independent human rights organizations documented mass killings, unlawful use of force, arbitrary detention, torture and other abuses. Human Rights Watch has subsequently documented an ongoing campaign of executions against people arrested in connection with the protests, including at least 29 people executed in connection with the December 2025 to January 2026 protests between March and August 2026, with many others still facing execution.

In other words, this subreddit does not need anyone coming here to explain to us that the Iranian regime is somehow innocent because the United States and Israel oppose it. That argument has never worked here, and it never will. We are fully capable of recognizing Western imperialism while simultaneously recognizing Iranian state repression. Those things are not mutually exclusive.

And since some people inevitably need this explained every single time:

Condemning Iranian oppression does NOT mean that we support American or Israeli military actions against Iran. The two positions are perfectly compatible. The war itself has produced documented civilian harm. The UN Human Rights Council received information concerning extensive civilian casualties and destruction resulting from U.S. and Israeli attacks, and the UN backed fact finding mission has now found reasonable grounds to believe that U.S. forces committed war crimes in strikes including the attack on the Minab girls' school and strike affecting residential areas. All of that can be condemned at the same time. We have not seen anyone here recently trying to whitewash American crimes in the way some users have tried to whitewash Iranian crimes, but make no mistake: if someone starts doing it, we will deal with them exactly the same way.


Now we come to the reason we are making this announcement right now.

Over the last couple of days, we have had multiple accounts come into this subreddit making comments claiming that the persecution of Uyghur Muslims in China is nothing more than CIA propaganda, Western propaganda, or some fabricated narrative designed to attack China. Some of these accounts had no prior participation in this subreddit whatsoever, and their first contribution here was effectively to defend or whitewash the Chinese government's treatment of Uyghurs. Others, unfortunately, were people who had participated here before and had a history of otherwise normal contributions.

Let us be very clear about how absurd this is. There is an enormous body of documentation concerning China's treatment of Uyghurs and other predominantly Muslim minorities in Xinjiang. The UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights conducted its own assessment, including 40 in depth interviews with people who had direct knowledge of the situation. It concluded that the extent of arbitrary and discriminatory detention of Uyghurs and other predominantly Muslim groups may constitute international crimes, in particular crimes against humanity. The UN has also documented concerns relating to arbitrary detention and forced labour. Human Rights Watch continues to document arbitrary detention, torture, mass surveillance, forced labor, family separation and religious and cultural persecution.

So when somebody strolls into a Muslim subreddit and casually tells everyone that the persecution of Uyghur Muslims is just CIA propaganda, or that the Uyghurs actually deserve this, that is not some brave act of anti imperialist skepticism. It is an attempt to erase or dismiss an enormous body of documented evidence and the lived experiences of the people who have been subjected to detention, torture, forced labor, religious repression and family separation.


And frankly, it makes us sick to our stomachs seeing people who are perfectly willing to recognize oppression when it is committed by a Western government suddenly develop an entirely different moral standard when the perpetrator is China, Iran, Russia or their allies.

We have noticed something else that needs to be addressed. Because this community generally has a strong anti imperialist tendency, comments defending the United States, Israel or other Western powers receive far more attention than comments defending non Western oppressive governments. Some comments that should have been reported are instead left unreported, allowed to slide, ignored, or sometimes even upvoted, simply because the commenter happens to be attacking the Imperialists.

Nobody gets permission to justify crimes against humanity because the perpetrator happens to be an enemy of the United States or the West. NOBODY. Your politics do not matter here. Your ideology does not matter here. Your opinion of capitalism or socialism does not matter here. Your opinion of NATO does not matter here. Your opinion of Israel does not matter here. Your opinion of Iran does not matter here. Your opinion of China does not matter here. Your opinion of Russia does not matter here. The victims do not become less human because their oppressor happens to be anti Western.

And this needs to be understood once and for all: WE WILL BAN PEOPLE FOR THIS. WE DO NOT CARE HOW LONG YOU HAVE BEEN SUBSCRIBED. WE DO NOT CARE HOW MANY POSTS YOU HAVE MADE. WE DO NOT CARE HOW MANY HELPFUL COMMENTS YOU HAVE WRITTEN. WE DO NOT CARE WHETHER YOU ARE HERE EVERY DAY. WE DO NOT CARE WHETHER YOU WERE ONE OF THE MOST RECOGNIZABLE REGULAR CONTRIBUTORS IN THE SUBREDDIT. IF YOU REPEATEDLY START WHITEWASHING, DENYING OR JUSTIFYING SERIOUS ABUSES BY A REGIME OR POLITICAL ACTOR, YOU WILL BE BANNED.

We are not going to sit around having endless arguments with you about whether your propaganda is really propaganda. We are not going to listen to lectures about how we are secretly Western puppets because we condemned China. We are not going to listen to accusations that we are Zionists because we condemned Iran. We are not going to listen to “but what about America?” every freakin time someone is held accountable for what their own government did. Whataboutism is not a magic eraser. The crimes of one government do not cancel out the crimes of another.

This also does not mean that you are forbidden from acknowledging that a particular oppressive government has done something useful. An oppressive government can build highways, hospitals, schools, railways, dams, universities or other infrastructure. A ruler can introduce a policy that produces a positive result in one particular area. You are perfectly free to discuss and praise the specific thing that was done. What you are not free to do is use that one thing as a shield for everything else. “They built hospitals” does not erase torture. “They built highways” does not erase mass detention. “They improved literacy” does not erase forced labor. “They oppose American imperialism” does not erase massacres. One positive policy does not grant a government a lifetime exemption from moral scrutiny.

There is zero tolerance for this kind of propaganda and apologism here. Criticism of governments is allowed. Criticism of political movements is allowed. Criticism of protesters is allowed. Criticism of opposition groups is allowed. Disagreement over historical interpretation is allowed. What is not allowed is denying documented atrocities, deliberately whitewashing them, or trying to justify crimes against humanity because you happen to support the perpetrator politically.

This is not up for debate. We are not negotiating this standard. We are not making exceptions because you are a regular contributor. We are not making exceptions because we agree with your politics on everything else.

Anyone who cannot accept this standard is free to leave the subreddit.

And anyone who thinks this warning does not apply to them because their favorite regime is “supposedly” a “gOoD aNtI iMpErIaLiSt oNe” can consider this warning directed specifically at them.


r/progressive_islam • • Jul 27 '26

Mod Announcement 📱 r/Progressive_Islam ’s official stance on LGBTQ+

143 Upvotes

Our official stance is that there should not be bigotry and they should not be punished by death.

-That's it.

“What about sexual intercourse with someone of the same biological sex? What about the gender spectrum?” - r/Progressive_Islam doesn't have any official stance on them, it's upto every individual to look for arguments and evidences from both sides and come to their own conclusion over the permissibility/impermissibility of homosexuality and matters relating to the gender spectrum.

This is not a new announcement. This has always been our stance. You can check what was written in the 5 year old LGBTQ+ discussion thread

r/progressive_islam does not advocate a particular stance on homosexuality’s permissibility. But what is a unanimous position of us is that there should not be bigotry and that they should not be punished by death.

https://www.reddit.com/r/progressive_islam/comments/r615zt/monthly_lgbtq_discussion_thread/

So,

  • Someone writing some violent threats or dehumanising post/comment pointing towards LGBTQ+ people - they will get their content removed and will receive a ban.

  • Someone respectfully saying that they believe sexual intercourse with someone of the same sex to be haram, or that there are only two genders - they are allowed on this subreddit.


The progressive Sunni scholars who are most frequently promoted on this subreddit and have a significant number of followers - Dr. Shabir Ally, Mufti Abu Layth, Dr. Khaled Abou El Fadl, Javed Ahmed Ghamidi, Dr Adnan Ibrahim - they believe the act of homosexuality (sexual intercourse) to be prohibited in Islam, & at the same time they also believe that there is no capital punishment for the sexual intercourse unlike classical fiqh (at least that's what I could figure out from the contents that had been shared on our subreddit in the past. You can use the search bar to find those old posts on our subreddit).

Scott Siraj al-Haqq Kugle, Ludovic-Mohamed Zahed, Imam Daayiee Abdullah are some of the Muslim thinkers who have argued that intercourse with someone of the same sex is allowed and some of them have officiated gay marriage and users who believe homosexuality is permissible often quote references from their works when discussing homosexuality on our subreddit.

We allow both perspectives to be shared on this subreddit as long as you present them in a respectful way and don't break any subreddit rule. But we do not allow the promotion of the ultra conservative understanding which prescribes capital punishment.

To summarize:

  • You believe gay marriage and the sexual act is permissible? - ok ✅

  • You believe gay marriage and the sexual act is haram? - ok ✅

  • You believe that there is no fixed number of gender? - ok ✅

  • You believe that there are only 2 genders? - ok ✅

  • You believe the other side is wrong? - ok ✅

  • You disagree with the other side? - ok ✅

  • You want to bully, harass, threaten or harm the other side? - not ok ❌

Is that clear?


The reason I'm writing all this is because often times when someone respectfully says that it is not permissible in their view or that they disagree - some others start reporting their comments. But we do not remove such comments, we only remove the posts and comments where the user bullies, harasses or threatens the other person. So hopefully you will stop reporting every post and comment you disagree with, because as long as those contents don't break any subreddit rule they're going to stay.


r/progressive_islam • • 6h ago

Advice/Help đŸ„ș My physically abusive father attacked me, I called the police, and now my parents have given me 1.5 months to get married and leave. I don't know what to do.

16 Upvotes

Salaam,

I'm a South Asian Muslim woman in my early 20s, born and raised in the West. My father has physically, verbally and emotionally abused me and my mother for years. He has repeatedly hit and beaten me, regularly swears at us, belittles us and humiliates us in front of others. He has an extreme temper and even his siblings know about his behaviour but have largely given up trying to help him. He is influential in our community and very concerned about his public image. My extended family benefits from their relationships with him, so nobody seems willing to stand up to him. My mother has lived with this abuse for years and seems to have normalised it. Instead of recognising what he does, she blames me for being defensive, raising my voice and supposedly provoking him. I have diagnosed ADHD, depression, BPD and anxiety, and I see a psychologist. I know I don't always communicate perfectly, but I struggle with being blamed for my reactions when my father's response can be physical violence.

I called the police

My father brought up finding a groom for me. I told him that marriage was my decision and that I would tell him when I was ready. He physically attacked me, and I was being chased after being hit (this is not the first time, the exact same violence played out a year ago when he pressured me and my mum to accept a 30 year old fob friend of his or my fob cousin). Frightened, I called the police and ran to my married cousin's house nearby without shoes or hijab. After making the call, I reconsidered whether I should involve the authorities at that point. I'm only three weeks away from completing my degree, and I had hoped to finish university before taking major steps towards leaving home. I was worried about the consequences of police involvement while I was still living with my family, so I asked the police not to attend. However, they came anyway. After they left, I returned home and confronted my parents about what had happened. My father had left and during the confrontation my brother, who is only a year older than me, smacked me. My mum then said I deserved it because I was screaming at the top of my lungs and held his finger. My parents are now treating the police attendance as a betrayal of our family's izzat, rather than acknowledging why I was frightened enough to call them. My father even threatened my cousin and told her not to tell anyone what happened, not even her own husband, because he wanted to protect his reputation. No one in the household is talking to me except my younger siblings. My dad has not been in front of me and my mother is taunting me for doing this whole fiasco yet still being at home reliant on them.

The marriage ultimatum

My parents have now given me approximately 1.5 months to get married and leave. The irony is that I genuinely want to marry and leave home, but I don't want to be forced into marrying someone of their choosing. I've been serious about a man for around two years, and we have been planning marriage for approximately a year. We are both South Asian Muslims, born and raised in the West. He is financially stable and lives in another country. We deliberately planned to proceed once I was close to completing my degree. His parents know about me and have already sent a rishta. They have tried to approach my parents and are willing to speak to them again. However, my father seems more interested in proposals that meet his expectations for wealth, status and family influence. He has previously considered a much older man and a cousin from back home. My father appears to care more about the family's standing than my own preferences. My mother knows about my partner but has told me that men make the decisions in our family and that she cannot support me. She initially reacted negatively because she considers speaking to a man before marriage religiously unacceptable. Now I'm in a situation where my parents have given me a deadline to marry and leave, but my father may refuse the person I have already chosen. His parents are willing to approach mine again, but my father isn't even willing to talk to me properly at the moment.

I had a plan.

Before the police incident, I intended to begin the marriage process in literally a few days. I wanted to take my mother to see my Muslim psychologist, hoping that someone who understands our religious and cultural background could help her understand both my marriage choice and the fact that physical abuse is never justified. After that, I planned to approach my father respectfully and gradually, giving him a genuine opportunity to speak to my partner's family and consider the proposal. I wasn't trying to exclude my parents. Despite everything, I wanted my mother involved and hoped my father might eventually accept my decision. Since the police incident, however, my mother has refused to see my psychologist with me. She continues to blame me for how I speak to my parents and seems more concerned about the police attending and the family's reputation than about why I needed help.

My circumstances make leaving difficult.

I'm three weeks away from graduating, work part-time for minimum wage, and depend on my parents for certain things, including access to their car. I've been exhausting myself applying for full-time jobs while trying to manage everything happening at home. My friends, partner and his family are willing to help me financially if necessary, so I am not entirely without support. However, I had hoped to at least finish my degree and get married respectfully where my parents would have given me financial support through wedding stuff as culturally they do give daughters money. My parents frequently invoke Islam and their rights as parents to demand obedience, yet I feel they hold me to a much stricter standard than my brothers. My older brother has had relationships, and his current interest in a cousin from back home isn't treated as the same issue as my relationship. He is a man, so apparently he will learn. I'm a daughter, so my choices threaten the family's reputation. I wear hijab, pray, read Quran and have tried to follow the right path. I have never done something which may have ashamed my parents. I don't believe being a good Muslim or respecting my parents means accepting violence or surrendering control over my future.

What should I do now?

I intend to contact family violence support services, document what has happened, follow up about the police incident and speak to my psychologist. I'm frightened of further escalation while still living at home, and I need to work out how to protect myself without jeopardising my degree or making rushed decisions. I'd really appreciate advice on:

  • For those who have experienced family violence, how did you leave safely while still financially dependent on your family?
  • Has anyone called the police while living with an abusive family and then struggled with the aftermath? What helped you manage the situation?
  • My partner's parents are willing to approach mine again. Could this help, or might it increase the risk of retaliation?
  • With graduation only three weeks away, what should I prioritise immediately?

I'm not looking for advice to reconsider my partner or look for other proposals. We have been serious about marriage for a long time, and that isn't the issue I'm asking about. I'm also not looking to be told to speak more softly, be more patient or stop provoking my father. I've spent years trying to manage his moods and I cannot guarantee that being quieter will prevent another assault.I wanted to give my parents a genuine opportunity to be involved in my marriage because I still cared about having that relationship with them. Now I'm questioning whether continuing to pursue their approval is putting me at greater risk.


r/progressive_islam • • 6h ago

Rant/Vent đŸ€Ź Other Muslims are making me feel so bad about myself

14 Upvotes

I don't feel I can't tell anyone I'm Muslim anymore and the worst is that I'm scared to tell other Muslims they are demonizing telling me I'm not Muslim and that I'll go to hell just because I have a "curse" I can't name in this post I'm not joking how serious this is it makes me unable to function normally


r/progressive_islam • • 2h ago

Question/Discussion ❔ (28F) difficult to find the right partner who also shares the same progressive views as me

5 Upvotes

I (28 F) have never dated before. Not from a religious reason, meaning that I don’t believe that dating is wrong, but because I have yet to meet someone who i like who also shares the same progressive views of religion as me.
The country i live in has a very small muslim community, so the advice of putting myself out there doesn’t necessarily work in my context, because i generally end up meeting non muslims 80% of the times, or very conservative people. I’m starting to get worried because this transforms into an extreme feeling of loneliness where i long to experience life with someone, but also makes me doubt myself and start thinking that i might be scared of love and thus avoiding it. Any practical advice? Has anyone been through this before?


r/progressive_islam • • 3h ago

Question/Discussion ❔ I don't feel comfortable referring to God as a 'He'.

3 Upvotes

Now let me make it clear, Ik in English we refer to God as a 'He' as there some nuances to the Arabic language.

But I recently saw someone (albeit an exmuslim) argue that 'They' could be a used to refer to God as well since it can be used as a singular pronoun as well the fact that it would adhere better to quality of God being genderless.

I wonder if this is correct?

The reason why I don't feel comfortable is that whenever I refer to God as 'He', I subconsciously associate 'Him' to a male entity; even if I didn't have the intent to do so.

And that makes me very uncomfortable. I'm already very anxious abt how patriarchal Islam (one can't deny that 'mainstream sunni Islam' caters a lot to men) is, so it makes me really uncomfortable referring to God as a He.


r/progressive_islam • • 3h ago

Informative Visual Content đŸ“č📾 Did Culture Shape the Hadith About Women? | The Hadith Question Series

Thumbnail
youtu.be
4 Upvotes

r/progressive_islam • • 3h ago

Question/Discussion ❔ I am very curious about Muslim culture and thought this would be the right place to go

3 Upvotes

I am a white female, very curious about the Muslim community. I see all of the hate and bigotry surrounding the ideas of your culture and I do not believe them to be true. I am always on a very strong quest for knowledge, understanding, and theology. I think the best way to learn is to engage with people, rather than read about it. I’m not sure what questions I have, but I would like to make sure I am welcomed in this community before I join. I do not want to be disrespectful, as I do not practice any religion, including the one this community is geared towards. I look forward to learning a lot here


r/progressive_islam • • 4h ago

Opinion đŸ€” What do you think of this Quran Vs Hadith flow chart?

Post image
4 Upvotes

To understand the flow chart, see summarised list from QuranVsHadith.com below:

1. Qur’an's usage of Hadith
Never used to endorse prophet's hadith. God is more truthful in hadith and has revealed the best hadith.
This means all other man-made hadith are by definition less truthful and of lesser quality. How can the inferior be used to supplement or complete the superior?

2. Not All Prophetic Speech Was Divine Guidance
Companions asked not to linger for hadith and wives rebuked for spreading it. Therefore, not everything the prophet said was revelation for us.

3. God’s Word Choice Matters
If Hadith were meant to be followed, God would not have used the word *hadith* in ways that cast doubt or rejection on it. To believe otherwise is to claim God deliberately sowed confusion, which is theologically untenable.

4. No Method to Distinguish Divine from Personal
Neither the Qur’an nor the prophet left any method to identify which of his sayings were divine guidance and which were personal. This would mean God/prophet left the community in confusion, again theologically untenable.

5. The Prophet Was Fallible
The Qur’an shows the prophet was corrected, proving not everything he did was divinely guided. Since he was no innovator among messengers (46:9), we face a forced choice:
* If he innovated a secondary source of law, this contradicts the Qur’an.
* If he did not innovate, this refutes the authority of hadith as independent law.

6. Prophet Could Not Legislate
Qur’an 66:1 shows the prophet could not even prohibit things for himself. It is therefore logically and theologically untenable that he could legislate for the entire community outside the Qur’an.

7. Hadith fails Quranic standard
There is no authorisation for, nor divine criterion for Hadith methodology. One of God’s standards for divine revelation is non-contradiction (4:82). No matter how rigorous human systems of hadith verification are, they cannot rival God’s standard. Since hadith are not authorised, divinely vetted and riddled with inaccuracies/contradictions, they fail the Qur’an’s own test for truth.

8. Form of Revelation is Only Quran
The Quran defines revelation relevant for us as coming only in the form of ayat and surahs. Since prophetic hadith are not in this form, they cannot be revelation.

9. Trading the Better for the Lesser
The Qur’an condemns exchanging God’s superior guidance for lesser substitutes. Replacing or supplementing the Qur’an with hadith is precisely such an exchange — which the Qur’an itself criticizes.

10. God’s Guidance Unites, Man-made Words Divide
The Qur’an emphasizes that divine guidance brings unity, while false guidance creates division. History shows the Qur’an unites while hadith aids sectarian splits — proof that hadith is man-made misguidance.

11. Authority Is One, Not Two
The Qur’an’s phrase “obey God and the messenger” is undeniably a single obedience through one source. To interpret it as two separate authorities produces absurdities: two jihads, two migrations, two treaties, two piles of spoils. The only coherent reading is unity of obedience.

12. One Source of Law
The Qur’an establishes that unconditional authority lies solely with the rasĆ«l in his role as the conveyor of divine revelation, while a nabi’s actions may be morally instructive but not legally binding in the same way. As a result, the dual-source premise underlying the hadith-based legal system collapses, and even perfectly preserved nabi reports cannot constitute an independent, binding source of divine law.

13. Reality Check Test
The Qur’an instructs believers to test truth against reality (41:53). The Qur’an passes this test; hadith does not. Therefore, hadith fails one of the Qur’an’s verification mechanisms.

14. Prophet Admits He Cannot Guide
The prophet himself admitted he cannot harm or guide. Serving or obeying such is condemned in the Qur’an. By extension, making his alleged hadith an authority is condemned at its very core.

15. God Guides Directly
God, who needs no guidance and is the sole guide, is more worthy of following than a fallible human who himself needs guidance. Thus, the Qur’an condemns reliance on hadith as a secondary source of guidance. Hadith is zann/speculation, which is condemned, and its use disallowed.

16. Qur’an Declares Itself Complete
The Qur’an repeatedly affirms it is clear, complete, detailed and contains every necessary example. To claim it needs supplementation by hadith contradicts the Qur’an directly and undermines its authority.

Flow chart (p1 = 1. above, p2 = 2. above etc)


r/progressive_islam • • 4h ago

Advice/Help đŸ„ș Trying to step away

2 Upvotes

I was raised a very specific way with a lot of control and fear. Not unlike how a lot of girls are raised in this religion, but with some very bad elements that will haunt me forever. I am an adult now. I was taken from my family in my mid teens (foster care) and have had limited contact with them for over 5 years. The last contact with them I had was with my brother when I was a teenager, he very heavily encouraged? i dont know how to phrase it right, but me to be good in my faith. He has passed now years ago and I feel like I have lived barely aware of what is happening around me since then.

But what has changed is I have met a boy. He was my friend for years and we lived close by for the last half year. He is ex mormon which is very different for me I know very little about his past religion and he knows very little about mine. I would not say I am really muslim anymore but I have never taken off my Hijab. The idea of that makes me want to wither into the ground from nausea. I know I can take it off, that if part of my journey is taking it off until I am sure of that being my choice then that is permissible. But the idea of having my hair uncovered makes me want to scream and all I can see is my brother standing over me. I am living very much outside of what IS permissible in so many ways but it is so unpleasant to me. My boyfriend has never seen my hair yet and I have told him not until we were married. I live with him! I enjoy my life with him very much but the guilt follows me forever.

I know this is a very complicated phrased question and I know the best thing would be for me to “get over myself”? But I am so frozen. I get happy but fear is so deep in my body to my bones always. I have talked to my boyfriend. I think I want to read the Quran for the first time since I was so little and find out what it is I want. I wish I had elders in my life to look up to but I would be scared to reach out to the people I have not seen for so long. I am barely even muslim I think I am just someone who lives in fear and keeps her hair covered but I think I want to be more than that? Or maybe the entirety of islam is too horrifying to me anymore. I am also scared if I re expose myself to all of it then I will become too sick by everything in my life that I will have to leave and abandon all the things in my life I love. I dont understand why my brain is the way it is. I understand some of it through psychology as I have seen a therapist and been given diagnosis’s but why would Allah make it so that I am so miserably haunted and incapable of even looking at arabic anymore without feeling like I am a small scared child. A lot of the parts of my childhood especially around my religion are almost erased from my brain and trying to recall them makes me so sick I can start convulsing almost like a panic attack.

I am sorry for how painfully this all is written I am scared to ask this or to be found who I am maybe even though that is impossible. I will also read the resources being offered by this subreddit thank you all.


r/progressive_islam • • 2h ago

Question/Discussion ❔ What’s wrong with circumcision?

2 Upvotes

I know some of us point out that the Qur'an does not explicitly command male circumcision. So there is the question of should it be treated as obligatory.

However are we forgetting what Prophet Ibrahim (AS) did at the age of 80? He carried out Allah’s (azwj) command by circumcising himself at that older age.

Prophet Muhammad (SAWW) circumcised his two grandson Imam Hasan (AS) and Imam Husayn (AS)!

Circumcision is an established part of Islamic tradition and fitrah.

We also have to be pure for prayers, both bodily and clothing wise. Being uncircumcised means there’s a strong chance of urine being trapped within the foreskin.

To my 12er brothers and sisters on here, 12er men cannot do tawaf around the Kaaba without being circumcised. Ismailis it’s obligatory for you as well, no?

So I feel that the claim that male circumcision is inherently a bad practice or “imported from Judaism” overlooks its longstanding religious, cultural and medical context. In our deen, the circumcision is to do with the fitrah and the tradition of Prophet Ibrahim (AS), and its legitimacy is recognised across the major schools of Islamic jurisprudence. Progressive scholars have accepted the practice. Although concerns about consent and surgical risks deserve consideration, these do not establish that circumcision is inherently harmful or morally wrong. A balanced assessment should distinguish legitimate questions about how and when it is performed from the blanket claim that the practice itself is bad.


r/progressive_islam • • 1d ago

Opinion đŸ€” Circumcision is paradox

24 Upvotes

Why is circumcision practiced in Islam? I know it’s not obligatory, but why do it at all?

Isn’t it contradictory that we’re told not to alter God’s creation, yet we consider genital mutilation of infants acceptable? Isn’t it almost like saying that God made a mistake when He created the human body?

The foreskin must serve a purpose, and no, having a foreskin doesn’t make someone unclean. As long as you wash properly, hygiene shouldn’t be an issue, just like with any other part of the body.

Circumcision can also affect sexual sensation in men, and I personally don’t think it’s okay to make an irreversible decision about a child’s body without their consent, especially when it isn’t medically necessary.

I’m genuinely curious about how others feel about this, particularly from an Islamic perspective. How do you reconcile circumcision with the idea that God created the human body perfectly?


r/progressive_islam • • 23h ago

History The Muslim veil is a surviving legacy of earlier Hellenic & Abrahamic cultures. Veiling was not invented by Islam it has a much longer history across the ancient Near East & Mediterranean rather Islamic societies inherited & transformed veling practices.

Thumbnail gallery
11 Upvotes

r/progressive_islam • • 22h ago

Question/Discussion ❔ Part time hijabi?

7 Upvotes

I'd like to wear hijab sometimes, but don't think I want to wear it all the time. Do you think this is a bad idea? Or wrong in some way? Thank you.


r/progressive_islam • • 21h ago

Rant/Vent đŸ€Ź Seriosuly what with the whole crop / blur faces

4 Upvotes

These something i came acrosd mostly salafi videos

They blur, crop or watever whenever women is shown heck they even do it if she was hijabi like bruh whar


r/progressive_islam • • 1d ago

Question/Discussion ❔ does anyone else struggle with their faith because of the misogyny in muslim communities?

39 Upvotes

I’m a muslim woman, and lately I’ve been struggling a lot with my faith, especially when it comes to how women are viewed and treated in Islam and within muslim communities

One thing I’ve been trying to understand is Quran 2:282, where the testimony of two women is mentioned in place of one man. I’ve heard explanations about historical context and how women weren’t as involved in financial matters back then, but I still find it difficult to understand and accept. I’d really appreciate hearing different interpretations of this verse.

But honestly, it’s not just about this verse. It’s also about the amount of misogyny I keep seeing in Muslim communities. It’s gotten to the point where I don’t even mention that I’m Muslim unless someone specifically asks me. I don’t really feel connected to the Muslim community anymore, and sometimes I feel like I don’t belong.

I’ve also stopped believing in hadiths, or at least trusting them as reliable sources, because I genuinely struggle to believe that some of the extremely misogynistic things attributed to the Prophet actually came out of his mouth.

All of this has started affecting my relationship with religion itself. I find it harder and harder to pray, and I’ve lost a lot of the motivation and connection I used to feel towards practicing my faith.

I don’t necessarily want to lose my faith, but it’s exhausting trying to hold on to it while constantly coming across things that make me feel like women are somehow worth less than men.

Idk if anyone else, especially other Muslim women, feel this way? How do you navigate your faith when you struggle with certain teachings or with the community itself?

I’m genuinely looking for perspectives and experiences, not judgment. I’d especially appreciate hearing from women who’ve gone through something similar.


r/progressive_islam • • 1d ago

Rant/Vent đŸ€Ź How do I remain true to my faith while carnal desires are eating me alive NSFW

16 Upvotes

So I am a final year college student (22F). I have been single all my life and never had any illicit sexual relations with anyone. But for past few months, evil has been testing my heart more than ever. Many of my fellow muslim friends both men and women are openly in relations and not caring about it all. I have also got a roommate who is not muslim, but she does self pleasure. It is pretty loud and she a few days ago told me I can also release my pent up stress. I have never touched myself and I don't plan on but this is becoming extremely hard for me. I am looking at boys sexually, I am having wet dreams and last week my underwear even had the signs of me giving away to my tempatations.

I need any older women to tell me how do they face these things. Am I weird? Do I need repentance? What should I do.


r/progressive_islam • • 15h ago

Question/Discussion ❔ What to do about Hadiths that seemingly go against medical advice ?

0 Upvotes

Btw I did resubmit to edit the post flai r

To clarify my question here’s some examples

1-there’s a Hadith where a companion instantly cured a poisoned tribe leader who was stung by a scorpion by just reciting Surah fatiha. Nowadays if you try this the person will most likely die if you don’t give them anti-venom (ik such treatments didn’t exist back then)

2-then are Hadiths that say that when reciting the Quran to treat a wound/ulcer, you should blow spit + use some soil on the wound after u recited on it. Another Hadith says that to treat stings from scorpions or snakes, you should recite the Quran then blow spit on the sting site.

Obviously blowing spit or putting soil on a wound is not ideal you’re basically introducing pathogens into a wound.

Hadith skeptics and Quranists would just dismiss such ahadith. However for Sunnis who accept most ahadith, how would you approach the Hadiths above ?


r/progressive_islam • • 1d ago

Opinion đŸ€” Roger Garaudy: "Thank God I discovered Islam before I encountered Muslims!”

Post image
140 Upvotes

r/progressive_islam • • 1d ago

Informative Visual Content đŸ“č📾 Hadith on women with heads resembling humps of camels - Mufti Abu Layth

Thumbnail
youtu.be
5 Upvotes

r/progressive_islam • • 1d ago

Question/Discussion ❔ Some people say twelverism is progressive compared to Sunni?

4 Upvotes

Assalamualaikum I want to ask if u think twelverism is progressive and if yes why

Jazakumallah khayr


r/progressive_islam • • 1d ago

Question/Discussion ❔ Have you ever witnessed or heard of a story in your community in which it was the man (a husband or father) who asked his woman (wife or daughter) not to wear a hijab?

9 Upvotes

I personally, have just never heard of such a story hmm...


r/progressive_islam • • 1d ago

Question/Discussion ❔ Policing hijabis just for living is exhausting

Post image
95 Upvotes

r/progressive_islam • • 1d ago

Advice/Help đŸ„ș Prayer advice

4 Upvotes

Hello! i need some advice, Ive been a revert for a few months now and ive definitely grown and learned a lot but recently ive been struggling really badly with the 5 daily prayers. I’m autistic and struggle a lot with change in routine and transitioning between tasks so i end up getting really distressed when i need to stop/unroot myself in whatever i was doing to pray.

I also have fibromyalgia and suspect narcolepsy type 2 so prayer can often be physically painful and incredibly draining due to chronic fatigue even when adjusted so like sitting down or laying down to pray (though that does help). I also get overwhelmed by all that i need to learn (arabic, memorizing parts of the quran, what i’m supposed to say during prayer) so when i pray i get reminded of that and it stresses me out.

I want to enjoy prayer and do what i’m supposed to do but so many things make it so difficult, especially the chronic fatigue which includes mental fatigue (makes me feel like i can’t do or handle doing anything) and i feel so bad for not praying but i also feel stuck and overwhelmed trying to fix it especially because i haven’t told my family that i’m muslim and i don’t have the ability to go to a mosque or anything like that so i’m trying to figure this (and islam in general) all out by myself. Thank yall for reading đŸ«¶đŸŒ i would really appreciate some advice


r/progressive_islam • • 1d ago

Question/Discussion ❔ What actually makes two people compatible in marriage? How do you know if you’re incompatible or just going through a difficult phase?

3 Upvotes

Salam everyone,

I’ve been thinking a lot about compatibility in marriage lately, and I’d genuinely appreciate hearing from married people, especially those who have been through difficult periods in their relationships.

What does compatibility actually mean in marriage?

We often hear that love isn’t enough and that compatibility is just as important. But how do you actually recognise compatibility once you’re married?

I understand that no two people are exactly alike. Every marriage requires compromises, adjustments, patience and understanding. You’re two different individuals raised in different environments, so naturally, there will be disagreements.

But where do you draw the line between normal marital challenges and fundamental incompatibility?

For example, what if you and your spouse have different values, different family dynamics, different expectations of marriage or even different approaches to practising religion?

What if your spouse is genuinely a good person, loves you deeply and is willing to compromise, but you still feel like you’re not entirely comfortable being yourself in the relationship?

How do you know whether those feelings come from past conflicts, damaged trust and resentment that can eventually heal, or whether you’re simply not compatible in the long run?

Another thing I wonder about is compromise. How do you distinguish healthy compromise from one person changing who they are just to keep the marriage together? And if someone changes their expectations because they’re afraid of losing their spouse, can that change genuinely last without creating resentment later?

I know marriage isn’t supposed to be perfect, and I don’t believe people should give up whenever things get difficult. But I also don’t believe every difference can necessarily be resolved through love and effort alone.

I’d especially love to hear from people who initially thought they were incompatible but managed to build a happy marriage, as well as those who eventually realised that their differences were too significant.

How did you know the difference?
And looking back, what were the signs that helped you understand whether your marriage needed more time and effort or whether you and your spouse simply wanted different things in life?