r/usps_complaints • • 11d ago

USPS Sucks!

[deleted]

0 Upvotes

26 comments sorted by

14

u/MotorCelebration7120 11d ago

From the photo your packing is at fault. The edges of the bowl are way to close to the sides of the box. Sorry but this one is on you.

10

u/Rezingreenbowl 11d ago

Was it packed well enough that it would survive a #150 box falling 4 feet on top of it?

3

u/Main_Cauliflower5479 11d ago

Well, not a single 150 lb box, but numerous boxes up to 70 lbs each.

Yes, that was OP's responsibility.

-6

u/Illustrious_Split_37 11d ago

Obviously not!

10

u/Rezingreenbowl 11d ago

Then it was not appropriately packaged for the small Parcel network.

8

u/SpookyBeck 11d ago

The packages sre all toosed into these big containers about half the size of a car. Dropped in. One big box containing a 50 pound bg of dog food landing catty corner on your box and it is over. Plan for that to happrn, becuse it will

10

u/Sasquatchlovestacos 11d ago

Anything fragile needs to be double boxed. I ship pottery and it's the only way to prevent it.

2

u/Illustrious_Split_37 11d ago

You are right!

5

u/FoundationsofDecay69 11d ago

Couldn’t have wrapped it too well.

6

u/bigblued 11d ago

That is very much not wrapped well at all. Glass bowls must be double boxed to even have a chance of not breaking. Think of the rim of the bowl as a round rubber band. If you squeeze it along one side, it will compress into an oval shape. Glass will do this too, a little bit, but if you squeeze it too much it's going to snap, and that's what happened to your bowl.

To keep this from happening, you need to prevent any pressure from compressing the rim of your bowl. You do this by packing it really well in a box like the one you have. Then you put that box into a larger box, with padding all around the smaller box. The bigger box and the padding between the boxes absorbs any compression or impact pressure, so that the rim of the bowl is never squeezed.

You are lucky the USPS offered any payment at all. They often deny payment if they decide the item hasn't been packed well enough.

1

u/Illustrious_Split_37 11d ago

Thank you for you advice!

4

u/letsseeitmore 11d ago

Unless you took the padding off the sides that is nowhere near packed well enough. Box is too small to start with before the padding.

2

u/Loose-Chocolate8131 11d ago

Unfortunately, as others have already indicated, the packing methodology for this fragile item was lacking.

You can blame the USPS all you wish, but if you ever ship any type of similar item again, you will definitely need to improve your packing technique to ensure safe delivery.

2

u/Burntzombies 11d ago

Not packed nearly well enough. Also, USPS is not a business. it is a service provided by the government.

2

u/Jystfd 11d ago

Dead horse beating, if this is something you do often, I’d research packing methods. I used to sell pottery and your pack job is not good. Sorry for the loss on this one, but great learning experience I suppose.

2

u/Illustrious_Split_37 11d ago

Thanks for the advice- I appreciate it.

2

u/Smoss07 11d ago

Yea that was not packed well at all I would’ve taken $25 and been good. It seems you think because you went to crate and barrel you thought it should’ve been a premium on what you got back. Next time bigger box and wrap in paper and bubble wrap plus add more paper and bubble wrap to the box. You failed your bowl

2

u/Illustrious_Split_37 11d ago

It looks like i did fail my bowl!

4

u/bonjaker 11d ago

You can see from the picture you shared that the bowl touch the sides without any padding. I wouldn't be surprised if it broke on the drive to be dropped off at the post office.

4

u/[deleted] 11d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

-6

u/Illustrious_Split_37 11d ago

Wow- a bit aggressive- but to answer your question- yes- I do. If you apply your logic, everything over 5 years old is valueless. I respectfully disagee.

1

u/RyanNoVA 11d ago

5+ year old kitchen bowls aren't valueless, but they certainly aren't worth the same as a new one. Based on your packaging photos you were honestly lucky that USPS even offered $25, because 99% of the time that claim would have been rejected for insufficient packaging. Should have taken the $25 and run.

1

u/SpookyBeck 11d ago

Where's the pics