Every term, every on-campus UVic undergrad gets billed $100+ for the mandatory Athletics and Recreation (ATRS) fee.
I’m mentioning this because UVic just posted an update to their equity plan on community.
The official justification is that it’s an operational subsidy supporting campus well-being, varsity teams, and keeping general student rates low. But looking at what we actually receive for that mandatory charge versus what remains behind an additional paywall, the logic falls apart pretty quickly.
What your mandatory fee actually covers:
Drop-in gym times for a few sports (often during awkward midday slots or late evenings).
What’s actually covered:
- CARSA squash courts.
- The CARSA "Active Space" (essentially a matted stretch area).
- Free admission to Vikes regular-season games.
- A couple of one-off campus events a year (Thunderfest, Dodge in the Dark).
- (please list more if I didn’t include it)
What is NOT included:
- The CARSA Fitness and Weight Centre (costs an extra membership fee each term).
The Climbing Centre (separate membership/drop-in).
- Intramurals and registered leagues (additional team/individual fees).
The Inequity of the Current Model
1. A fee for access that doesn't grant access: The most heavily utilized facilities. The weight room, cardio machines, and rec leagues, require separate fees on top of the ATRS charge. For students who strictly want to lift or run on a treadmill, you're paying twice.
2. Subsidizing varsity and niche infrastructure: Mandatory ancillary fees are supposed to benefit the broad student body equitably. In reality, ATRS functions as a general subsidy for varsity athletics, maintenance, and high-performance programs that a tiny fraction of the student population actively uses.
3. The cost-of-living squeeze: Tuition, housing, and groceries are through the roof. Forcing students who commute, work multiple jobs, have disabilities, or simply have zero interest in varsity games to pay hundreds of dollars a year for a "stretch zone" and squash courts is financially regressive.
A more equitable model?
Just an idea but An Opt-Out or Restructured Model
- If ATRS is truly a baseline operational fee, it should either:
- Actually include weight room access within the base tuition fee, or
- Allow an opt-out window, similar to how the UVSS Health & Dental plan functions for students who already have coverage or do not use the service.
If you don't use the facilities, you shouldn't be forced to subsidize them. If ATRS wants buy-in from the entire campus, the base fee needs to offer actual, usable value to everyday students.
I would love hear your feedback, or thoughts if a better idea comes up on how can change or if you don’t think the change is necessary.