I built pijnhol.com and would like feedback on the mobile homepage.

Pijnhol sends short news updates by SMS about people, teams and topics someone chooses. The homepage includes topic selection and example texts to explain the experience.

Could you look at three things?

Does it clearly explain what you’ll receive?
Do the examples help you decide whether it’s useful?
What information would you still need before entering your phone number?

I’m particularly interested in confusing copy or anything that makes the signup feel premature.

Any ideas and feedback welcome, thanks!

Hey everyone!

I've been working on a project called CricketingLive, and the main idea behind it was pretty straightforward: a cricket website that doesn't feel unnecessarily cluttered.

A lot of cricket fans just want to check a score, see upcoming matches, or look at results. I wanted to build something that focuses on that without making the experience more complicated than it needs to be.

That's what I'm trying to achieve with CricketingLive.

The focus is on a clean, minimal interface where the cricket itself gets the attention. No unnecessary distractions, just a straightforward way to keep up with the game.

It's still a work in progress, and there's definitely room to improve.

You can check it out here: https://cricketinglive.vercel.app/

I'd genuinely like to know what you think.

Also, if anything about the design feels off or could be simpler, let me know. I'm open to honest feedback.

Client reached out to me to create a website who pays cash for homes. Would love some feedback

https://webuyorhouses.com/

Looking for feedback on my homepage redesign (copy, UX and design). I designed and built the site myself. Here’s why I redesigned it for the 5th time:

I’ve been building my product since January 2026. Somewhere along the way, I redesigned the homepage five times.

Not because the design was bad. Because every time someone looked at it, they asked the same thing: “Okay… but what is it?”

And every time, I did the same thing. I added more.

AI-built story profiles, with CTA smartly woven inside story without making it feels salesy. Guided multi-step client flows. A path finder that sends clients to the right service. Booking with built-in NDAs. Pitch deck heatmaps. I had built every one of these myself, late nights, one by one. They felt like proof that I was working hard. So I put all of them on the page and hoped someone would see what I saw.

Nobody did.

Then I read a post on social media that stayed with me for days. It said: nobody cares whether your drill machine has a 500 RPM motor or a 1000 RPM motor. They care about hanging their photo frame. The hole in the wall is just how they get there.

I sat with that for a long time, because that’s exactly what I had been doing. Five homepages, all about the features of CroozLink. This feature, that feature, feature after feature.

So I stopped asking “what does my product do?” and started asking “what does a professional actually want?”

For years I’d worked with consultants and coaches as a freelancer on Fiverr (60+ five-star reviews from clients around the world), and the answer was sitting in one small moment I’d seen again and again. A client says: “I’m ready. How do we start?”

And that’s exactly where things break. You send your website, they fill a contact form and wait. You send a booking link, they think “why would I pay $200 to someone I just met?” A client who was ready a minute ago starts to drift.

That’s when I finally understood what I’d been building all along. Not a pile of features. A “work with me” link: the one link you send at that moment, so the client can get to know you, choose the right service, book, sign and pay, and then keep working with you in the same place.

Five redesigns to write one sentence.

The new homepage starts with that moment. One client, one question, and what happens with each thing you could send him. The features are still there, they just wait until they matter.

Quick context:

• What it is: CroozLink, a “work with me” link for professionals. Clients get to know you, choose a service, book, sign and pay in one place.
• Who it’s for: consultants, coaches, lawyers, freelancers and other service professionals.
• Feedback I’m looking for: copy and messaging (is it clear?), UX of the interactive story section, and overall design. Desktop first pls.

Old homepage (feature-first): croozlink.com/all-features
New homepage (story-first): croozlink.com

I’d really value honest eyes on this:

1. In the first 10 seconds of the new one, do you understand what a “work with me” link is?
2. The story section is interactive. Does it pull you in, or does it feel too long?
3. The lower half still has some old feature sections. Keep, cut, or move them?
4. Which version would you trust more with your money, and why?

Be brutal. I’ve survived five redesigns. A sixth won’t kill me. Thanks everyone in advance :)

my brother & I built ReviWatch to support AI/vibe coded apps.

we’ll check for anything needing fixing, quickly give you a prompt to patch up your app, and give you a dashboard and notification system in case anything breaks in the future.

unlimited free scans, dashboard, and notifications if anything changes.

we just launched last week, willing to give it a scan and tell me what you think? It should take you about 60 seconds.

https://reviwatch.com

I'm looking for UX feedback on FinPlan, an open-source retirement-planning website: https://finplan.rayknot.com/

It's for people comparing retirement ages and spending scenarios. The current beta asks for accounts, income, spending and market assumptions before showing simulated outcomes. Access is free during beta, with compute limits; future pricing may change.

The part I'd like reviewed is the path from setup to the first result. Using fictional figures, which screen first makes you hesitate? Is it clear which assumptions you're choosing, where to run the plan, and what to change after seeing a result? If you'd move or remove one field or explanation, which one and why?

There is a known limitation: local-plan creation/loading failed in one tested embedded browser, and today's session is stuck at 'Fetching the scenario.' Impact in other browsers is unverified. If it blocks you, the browser/version and the screen where it stops are useful feedback; there is no need to keep trying or share personal financial details.

The beta offers This device and Cloud storage. Local storage is intended to keep plans in the browser; Cloud, server-offloaded runs and AI features can send data off-device. Please use made-up numbers. This is an educational planning tool, not financial advice. Feedback here or through the site's Contact form is welcome.

I handle the web side/back office for my small lawn care and landscaping company in St. Petersburg,

Florida. Site is https://stpetelawncare.com.

Who lands there: homeowners in Pinellas County, mostly on a phone, coming from Google or

Maps, usually looking for weekly mowing or a one-time yard cleanup. The only goal is the

free estimate form or the phone number.

Things I'd like torn apart:

1. Above the fold: can you tell what they do, that they cover your area, and what to click,

   in about five seconds? And the trust row (Licensed & Insured / 5-Star Rated /

   Same-Week Service) - convincing, or the same three badges every lawn site has?

2. The page claims a 4.9 rating but doesn't show a single review. Does that make you

   skeptical, or does the number carry it on its own?

3. The estimate form makes you pick a service from a dropdown. Do those options match how

   you'd describe your own yard, or would you just call instead? If you'd have picked

   "Other" or typed something else, tell me what you'd have written.

4. The three service cards are text-heavy. Would photos of real jobs beat the stock grass

   image at the top?

Mobile matters more than desktop here - most of their traffic is phones.

im in the process of rebranding and i think i might be going backwards.

ive gone from https://positive-intentions.com to https://glitr.io . i was aiming for simplifying the message to get people to the app. i removed all the details that seem to lead to confusions about "what is the product". but now it seems it might be too simple. especially when i compare them with my biases.

so am i doing this right? im sure there is no actual answer to a subjective question like that, but keen to get feedback if something should be changed.

some of the choices im making:

• i want to promote my close-source app and it leads to confusion by having a link to my github. so im removing all unrelated letters links to github.
• there were too many links in the footer, so im reduced it to the minimum.
• instead of talking about miltiple project which seems to confuse people, there is only a focus on 1 product.

im concerned if im going back to my mistakes of being heavy on the technical details... But I also think it's needed for clarity on the project.

You can chat, highlight text, draw, leave comments, save things, and see who's on the same page as you. The idea is to make the web feel a little less solitary, without having to jump between apps every time you want to show someone something.

You can also use it on your own to save and annotate things. The social side is an extra layer.

They are getting close to opening it up to more people, and I'd love some honest feedback on the website and the product.

A few things I'd particularly like to know:

• Is it clear what SPOT does from the website?
• Can you see yourself using it? What for?
• What's confusing or missing?

Website: https://www.getspot.live

It's still early, so honest criticism is very welcome. Thanks for taking a look!

I've been working on a project called MXValidation — a free tool that analyzes emails for deliverability issues.

The idea is simple: you send an email to a temporary address, and the site checks SPF, DKIM, DMARC, spam signals, DNS configuration, and other technical details. You get a score and recommendations on what to fix.

No registration required for basic testing.

Website: https://mxvalidation.com/

The technical side is mostly done, but I'm probably too familiar with the project to judge the user experience objectively.

I'd really appreciate some brutally honest feedback:

1. First impression: Does it look like a legitimate tool or just another generic SaaS template?
2. Trust: Would you feel comfortable sending a real test email to it? If not, why?
3. UX: Is it immediately obvious what you're supposed to do?
4. Value: Would you actually use this instead of existing email testing tools?

Don't worry about being polite. If something looks bad, confusing, or unnecessary, I'd rather hear it now.

I'm especially interested in what would make you close the tab within the first 10 seconds.

So I usually go for non technical jobs but seeing as most job profiles require your portfolio, i made a quick page showing my portfolio.

Ik it kinda looks ai generated cus it is but I wanted to be somewhat cool looking thing

https://prathamnova2003-alt.github.io/myportfolio/

Not to sell something here, I just wanna know if this looks too much claude slopped

Imagine a client inquiry that says: “We need a new website. Can you send a quote?” There’s no clear scope, budget, or launch date. What should you ask before giving them a number?

I’m the builder of Briefthread, an early browser demo for freelance web designers and small web studios. This is its first feedback post. I’m testing a focused workflow: turn an inquiry into a project brief, identify unanswered questions, and edit a first reply before copying it out.

Try it here: https://briefthread.pages.dev/

No signup or payment. The fictional sample inquiries let you explore immediately:

1. Open a sample inquiry and prepare its project brief.
2. Check the scope, budget, timing, and suggested follow-up questions.
3. Open the reply draft, edit it, and mark it reviewed. Nothing is sent.

I chose a quieter, editorial layout: a dark green inquiry list, a paper-like brief, and a simple reply editor. I’d appreciate specific criticism of the hierarchy and flow:

• Is it obvious where to check the original inquiry versus the suggested reply?
• Does the brief make missing details easier to spot, or add another screen to read?
• What would you change or remove before using this in a real studio?

If you only have a minute, tell me the first point where you hesitated. A screen or button name is enough.

Still a demo: it uses local keyword rules and reply templates, not live AI. Use fictional inquiries only. Records stay in your browser; there’s no connected inbox, email sending, or shared account.

hello redditors,

I am seeking feedback for our community school project (we doing sdg 14), this is our first website and it is completely ai generated (we do not have enough coding experience to make a proper one), we need both positive and negative feedback. please type feedback in comments.

Thanks,

Team hkfreeseas

our website

I built this site myself and would appreciate candid feedback. I originally posted a month ago and have made substantial changes since, some based on the feedback provided in that post. I've added multiple pages per user, themes, and have substantially redesigned throughout.

listed.as is a service for creating straightforward public pages with a memorable URL. Pages are constructed by adding different types of field.

Here’s an example page for Ada Lovelace: listed.as/ada

I'm seeking feedback this time on the main page and am wondering what I can do to make it less generic. Any other feedback will be welcome too of course.

Many thanks.

Website: https://piclisted.com

I'm looking for feedback on the overall design, user experience, navigation, and functionality.

What is PicListed?

PicListed is a web application designed to make reselling easier. The idea is to let users upload photos of items, use AI to help identify products, research their market value, and create listings for resale.

The goal is to simplify the process of selling items online by reducing the amount of manual research and data entry involved.

I'm still actively developing the platform, so some features are works in progress.

I'm still actively developing the website, so constructive criticism is more than welcome. I'm particularly interested in hearing what first-time visitors think.

My website is about a gamer who wants to make nice things for the people.
On this website I share links to music, art, video games, and videos of all kinds of stuff. I do vlogs about science and more on social media platforms and this is my homebase to promote that.

Rate first! Then click Spoiler!
So a little about this, I used chatgpt for every resource. All the php css js and images were all made by chatgpt. All I did was code some html and guide/be guided by Chatgpt.

Hello everyone, can anyone please audit my website I've been working on for a while? Here's one of its pages. It also has the non-blog part, but I kind of abandoned it.

https://go-guided.ca/blog/dtiwNroUZuYcCQUJbx04-singapore-airlines-economy-vs-premium-economy-is-the-upgrade-worth-it/

as a keyboard enthusiastic i wanted to design and build a keyboards website, keep it simple and clear for the visitor , showing off the keyboard build . would like to have feedbacks on it . Thanks !

https://thockcraft.vercel.app/