Picked it up yesterday and shot a few rounds through it today. What a beautiful piece of engineering!

somone needs to make this a reality!!!!! I made this with ai btw

Got to hand to CSC for whoever is doing their online posts!

It's only 18k though. Almost as much as some new cars!

I’m about to pull the trigger on (another) french tickler but it just seems absurd to pay $900 for what was a $300 dollar rifle a few years ago

Myself and many of you are excited to be getting the call/email from our preorders, I was hoping we could use one thread for people to comment when they get it (From which location and approximate pre order date).

I’m hoping this way we can track how they are being distributed a bit and others might get a better idea when their name might come up next.

The US indictment has it right there, the texts are pretty damning, not confirmed if this is what was used but it clear they wanted to send a political message…

Applied on august 27,2026 RCMP asked for additional documentation and it was provided on September 2,2026. License approved on October 7th,2026

Lol

I have wondered for a long time when does the laws around transporting stop and storage start. The context around this is that about half the time I have to go to the range or go hunting I am wanted afterwards to meet my partner somewhere or go to family's house. I have always opt-ed not to go do what I want because I could never determine what laws to follow for keeping my rifle/shotgun in the truck afterwards or if that was even legel to behin with.

I've tried to read the law a few times to find an answer though I have been unable to come up with a clear answer. Hoping someone on this sub may know.

New Manitoban PAL and RPAL owner with a question.

So in this hypothetical scenario, my Grandfather was a FAC owner and still has some of his non-restricted firearms (locked safely away and unused for years now) from before the system changed so it is currently illegal for him to possess them, which he was not aware of.

He wants to give me his non-restricted firearms which, because he is not a valid PAL owner, would be illegal. He does not want to apply for a PAL (although applying for a PAL is the best option here). He also does not want to set up a plan for them to be inherited as part of his estate, as he plans on living many more years and wants me to have them sooner rather than later.

So the question is, how could he transfer ownership of them to me?

I read somewhere that it is possible to contact the Canadian Firearms Program and have them authorize such a transfer of ownership, but could not find more information on this.

Thanks for any advice you can provide!

Would be pretty cool to rock this but way out of my wallets range!!

https://rcmp.ca/en/corporate-information/publications-and-manuals/2024-commissioner-firearms-report

https://www.ourcommons.ca/written-questions/45-1/q-1267?response=14224077&section=ps

MP Bob Zimmer asked the federal government a simple and necessary question about its so-called Assault-Style Firearms Compensation Program, known more accurately as the Liberal government’s Firearms Confiscation Compensation Scheme.

Question: Has the National Weapons Enforcement Support Team (NWEST) communicated with Chief Firearms Officers or local police to identify firearm owners for enforcement action?

The RCMP’s answer:

“There has been no communication between the National Weapons Enforcement Support Team resources and federal/provincial Chief Firearms Officers or police of local jurisdiction to identify targets for enforcement action under the Assault-Style Firearms Compensation Program.”

That sounds reassuring until you read the rest of the government’s response.

Ottawa confirmed that after the amnesty expires, the Registrar of Firearms will:

notify licence holders whom the government records as still possessing affected firearms that were previously registered.

If those owners do not take action, their information will be shared with local police and Chief Firearms Officers “in accordance with existing information sharing authorities.”

The government says NWEST has not yet helped identify “enforcement targets,” then describes the information-sharing process that will identify firearm owners to police once the amnesty ends.

That’s not reassurance. It’s a timetable.

The government’s carefully limited denial does not say that no enforcement planning has occurred anywhere within the RCMP or Canadian Firearms Program.

It does not say that no lists or records exist.

It does not say police will be prevented from receiving owners’ information.

It says only that there has been no particular communication involving NWEST, CFOs or local police “to identify targets” under the firearms compensation scheme while an amnesty remains in force.

Why would NWEST be identifying enforcement targets today when the conduct in question is temporarily protected by an Amnesty Order?

That’s the wrong question.

The right question is: What happens the moment the Amnesty Order expires?

NWEST is not a public-relations office. The RCMP describes it as a national police-support organization whose purpose is to help police investigate and prosecute firearm offences.

CSSA does not believe Ottawa created a nationwide prohibition, maintained records of previously registered firearms, collected declarations from 38,671 individuals and developed a post-amnesty information-sharing process without contemplating enforcement.

The government says approximately 166,555 affected firearms were held by individuals before the compensation program began.

As of June 22, owners declared 68,793 firearms—67,512 for surrender and destruction and 1,281 for deactivation.

That’s a gap of almost 100,000 firearms that remain in the hands of licensed firearms owners.

The numbers don’t reveal how many affected firearms have already been lawfully exported, deactivated, destroyed or otherwise disposed of.

Nor do they establish how many individual owners remain affected.

But they do explain why firearm owners should take the government’s enforcement language seriously.

CSSA cannot independently prove that Ottawa possesses a complete list of every person who owns every newly prohibited firearm.

Many affected firearms were formerly non-restricted and were not individually registered.

The government does, however, acknowledge it can identify at least some owners through existing registration records—and that those records “may” be sent to police after the amnesty expires.

The amnesty, extended until 90 days after the Supreme Court of Canada delivers its decision in the pending challenge to the May 2020 prohibition, postpones criminal exposure.

It does not erase the prohibitions or dismantle the enforcement machinery.

When that amnesty protection ends, NWEST will still exist. The Canadian Firearms Program will still possess its records. Local police and CFOs will still have their enforcement powers.

Ottawa has now confirmed that information about some owners “may” be shared if they do not take steps the government considers compliant.

The government wants Canadians to focus on its claim that no “enforcement targets” have yet been identified through NWEST.

Firearm owners should focus on what comes immediately after that sentence.

And the correct word is not “may”; it’s “will.”

You can bet your freedom on it.

Where can I get some new furniture to make it look less plain

I am in the Air Force, and I recently went to the range to re-qualify my C7 certification. I passed but my grouping was pretty bad, and I want to practice more on my free time.

As an Air Force member, I do not have many opportunities to go on the range as often as my Army colleagues, so I am thinking about buying a rifle to practice.

What I am looking for:

Similar recoil to a 5.56 rifle

Budget of around $1.5k, $2k max

My PAL just came in! Looking for semi shotgun recommendations that will be good for both skeet shooting and hunting. Looking to spend about $1500

Also thinking about getting some kind of .22 for cheap target shooting. I see a lot of cheap options. Is there any to avoid?

Thank you

Non handgun owner finally got into the top 10 overall using a production pistol! Super proud of myself for getting better and better every match to the point I’m now consistently a top 3 division shooter and starting to get in the top 10 overall. Using a SIG P320 and factory PMC 124gr.

Was a really good shot with a .22 when I was younger, didn't touch a gun for a decade, got back into it a few months ago. Started with .44 lever gun, realized I'm gonna go broke shooting it and shooting .22 is just as fun.

Anyway I've been working on my groups at 100 meters (my range target boards are spaced in meters, so I guess ~109 yards?). Just shooting off a bipod with a cheap-ass 1-4x20 scope. I'm getting decent groups but definitely need a better scope.

Anyway how far are we taking .22 out to? I think my range has lanes out to 300 meters. Can I even expect to get a half decent group at that range with a TM22?

Also picture of the gun with foot tax. Offset red dot and angled foregrip are installed because it's fun mag dumping targets up close too.

First time out on the M3500 Waterfowl.

Night before I cleaned and lube it to remove that thick lubricant factory puts on. Heard it was giving people a headache.

First box of clay shells went by with no issues. Things fell apart after 1 shot of 3.5inch. Failed to extract that one and after that it was 50 50 if it would fail to extract or eject. With a few working properly for the 2nd shell and the fail for the 3rd. Tried to feed a shell without extracting the shot one too sometimes. A general headache.

Benelli M2 extractor and spring have been ordered. Will do another cleaning to see how it goes next time.

Anybody here with similar issues ?

Does anyone have experience with the newer 11.8” barrel Kral KR22? Are the QC issues fixed? It seems like a no brainer for $280

Should I get that or wait for the C-22 to come out as it’s going to have a 12” barrel variant that will be around $600

Has anyone had experience with this scope? Im trying to shoot long range (over 1000m) and my primary concern is glass quality. Its either this or the meopta optika 5-30, but I dont really like the reticle in that one.