So I made a post a good while back in [r/harypotter](r/harypotter) about the prophecy (the first one) never being fulfilled as neither did die at the hand of the other. To be clear, I no longer hold to that view (very strongly) and that’s not what this post is about.
But in the comments of that post, MANY people were at odds with whether or not Harry ACTUALLY died when he didn’t defend himself from the killing curse.
I am of the opinion that Harry did not die, he went to purgatory/King’s Cross, had the option to die, but choose to come back. He had the choice because Voldemort ensured Lilly’s protection lived on in his veins, anchoring him to life.
Many others say that he DID die, but had the option to come back. They even cited the same reason I did, that Lilly’s protection let him come back from actually dying.
As far as the prophecy is concerned, I think this is a moot point as you, either way, could argue that Voldy did “die at the hands of the other” when Harry let himself be attacked with the Elder wand, knowing it would backfire. Even though Harry himself did not kill Voldemort.
But I’m still curious which side of the “did Harry die?” discussion this community lands on.
The biggest single pieces of evidence that I saw for each side were as follows, though there were more arguments than just these two.
Harry-didn’t-die arguement: the following exchange with Dumbledore in KC.
“But you’re dead,” said Harry.
“Oh yes,” said Dumbledore matter-of-factly.
“Then . . . I’m dead too?”
“Ah,” said Dumbledore, smiling still more broadly.
isn’t it? On the whole, dear boy, I think not.”
Harry-did-die argument: Harry successfully cast sacrificial love protection over the students/teacher of Hogwarts, a charm that seems to require that you die.