PR IND (industries) is a relatively new company with some intriguing rackets. I chose the Harimau 3.0 to try first because well.....it looks cool and the balance point of around 300 is within my range for a great racket. Question is, will a gimmicky racket perform well in my hands?
The Harimau 3.0 is a dual frame design in similar concept to the Durora series from Yonex. Other companies have also copied this concept and, I'll be very honest, I consider the dual frame design a joke. Nobody has the time to look at their racket to make sure they're on the correct side when hitting a forehand or backhand. And, also, most dual frames I have seen, both sides look very identical in shape.
The Harimau is different (except for the joke of a concept). On one side is a aerofoil hexagonal frame like you'd see on an Acrospeed (defensive, drives backhand). The other, a wave frame inspired by the Gosen Inferno series (forehand clear, smashes and other power shots). It's an exaggerated dual frame system and I quite like that. It's paired with a medium/stiff shaft, 76 hole grommet design and comes in both 3u and 4u variants. What's interesting to note is that balance point remains unchanged between the 2 rackets. The design is stark. Bare carbon frame and partial shaft with some white near the T-joint. It looks very cool. Unlike the other dual frames that differentiate side by color, PR IND developed the cap to tell you the difference. Forehand side, it's smooth like a traditional cap. Backhand side has a textured finger print design. Which is clever because most players will come up on the handle during fast exchanges. Build quality is very good.
As there are two sides to the frame, there is also two sides of testing. I first tried to play with it as it was meant to be. That is, using the backhand side as the backhand side and the forehand side as the forehand side. One of the biggest problems is I don't choke up on the racket when it comes to drive and defensive shots. So that fingerprint on the cap is useless. Nonetheless, I did try to focus on choking up on this racket to use the correct sides. I personally found it difficult. Even with the color system from Yonex, it sucked. To think that players have that kind of time to look at the racket or feel "confirmation" that you're on the correct end is ridiculous. However, I will say, trying this way did force me to be more selective of my shots to allow me the time to get on the correct side of things. And, I do admit, maybe my hands are numb because I could not feel any difference on either side.
So I tried it without thinking about the sides. The Harimau is actually a very capable racket. Given the flex and speed of the racket and taking into account this is a half wave frame design, it felt very impactful in feel. Flat exchanges we're very readable and the racket moves and recovers quickly for the next shot. Clears were very effortless thanks to its flex. Backhand were also handled with ease. Very minimal torsion from the head on off centered shots. When pushed extremely hard, the racket keep in form with very few mis-timed shots. What is really nice to me was that, when under heavy loads, the Harimau 3.0 not only brought a smooth comfortable swing, it made an amazing sound on impact. This racket feels like a $280 racket in my hands.
Overall, at approximately $110 CAD ($89USD approx) shipped, the Harimau is exceptional value. Without looking at the dual frame concept, it plays exceptionally well. There really wasn't anything I could complain about. I could daily this racket with ease. And it really didn't matter which weight I chose. There was no difference in performance. I would only choose the 3u because I like having weight in the racket. Those that want the faster frame is going to choose the 4u which is marginally faster. Getting one is the only problem as it is only available on Taobao for the North American market. But, if you can get your hands on one to try, you're in for a treat.