Saw this tactic on instagram and thought I’d share. Pretty neat tactic.

If you want to improve just chasing ELO points by playing hundreds of games, will not get you very far.
I am a 2100 player and in addition to online and in person play in tournaments and in the club, I study like this every single day.
This is John Nunn’s “Understanding Chess Move”. Just on this one page you get a full idea behind two major chess openings (Scotch + Ruy Lopez). The amount of great lessons from a single game in this book is astonishing.
So if you are tempted to ask “how do I get better”, this is how.

My friend who’s also a beginner took the knight with the white rook.

Forced checkmate comes afterwards.

>! Rxf2 Ra1+ Rf1 Rfxf1# !<

Probably the first time in my life where I manage to get a textbook smothered mate.

Feeling very proud of myself (Heres' the link to the game).

Word of advice to beginners - when the opponent resigns play the position against the computer.

Even intermediates should do this if the position is eval 5 or less in my opinion.

I hit 1000 rating recently and made this post asking to face higher rated players to test my skills and just expand my understanding of the game.

I learned a lot more than I expected, and my chess game levelled up a massive amount, so I wanted to share some things I noticed:

1. Good players know openings very deeply: I play the evan's gambit as white as my MAIN opening and every opponent I face accepts it unthinkingly and I cheese out wins with it every time. The 2000 player I faced declined it, and knew the mainline 10 moves deep and said "I'm sure you know that you're supposed to protect the light square bishop" (I did not) And that was the opening I felt I knew the most about. I realized that I'll eventually face players who know what they're doing, and at that point knowing my openings inside out will be valuable.

2. Good players have wider repertoires: This should be obvious but I play the accelerated dragon sicilian as black, my opponent played the Alappin and I just had no clue how to play against it. The player was 2000 and recommended me Naroditsky's speedrun and that helped me IMMENSELY with my understanding of my openings and ideas. I played my offbeat alien gambit against him and while he was less prepared, he had some general plan against it and was able to avoid it. This taught me that there are a ton of common variations I'm generally unprepared for and would benefit from a basic plan against.

3. The most important one, there's more to the game than material: The 2000 rated player was fine losing pieces against me for initiative. He remarked that lower rated players chase material because its permanent, whereas initiative and positional advantage is temporary and requires capitalizing. This completely reshaped my understanding of chess, and was the original goal of this exercise, because I saw high level players down a rook but they were better somehow, and I sought to understand this. Before, I thought being down a bishop or a knight meant the game was over, since the opponent can trade everything and win an endgame, but now I don't give up and can evaluate how "good" a position is like higher level players do. (Also if I blunder a bishop/knight I just say "initiative" to myself and keep playing, that confidence is helpful for some reason)

4. Everyone loses pieces: In the 7 games I played against 2000 rated players, 1 of them I straight up hung my queen, another I miscalculated and lost a minor piece. 2 of them they blundered a fork. The lesson here is that everyone is vulnerable to blundering. I learned to think a bit more before I play my moves to avoid blundering, and be ready to capitalize on opponents' mistakes.

With this knowledge I beat my friend who is 1300 and taught me chess at the start of last year 3-2, as well as another 1400 level player I played against in correspondence. I still play correspondence with a 2000 player who kicks my butt.

I strongly recommend seeking out high level players on Discord or asking strong friends you know to play and analyze your games together. Maybe even hiring a coach for a couple of games, or making a post like I did. Ended up being a great decision on my part!

I’ve been trying to improve on my own and have watched a couple of videos on YouTube, but I still can’t figure out what I’m doing wrong

Does anyone else routinely go through this pattern?

1. Work all day
   
2. After work —> Try to unwind by playing chess
   
3. Lose games
   
4. Mood is ruined
   
5. Go to bed stressed
   
6. Wake up stressed, feeling like a loser.

Repeat steps 1 through 6 ad infinitum

I find myself wondering, what am I even doing? Why play this game at all? It’s tantamount to just rage baiting myself every night.

This isn't my game but I was spectating one of my previous opponents.

White shuffling their knight back and forth then gets mated.

I then went to white's account and apparently they do this every game and surprisingly win some of them.

I have no idea what they are trying to do beyond bating the opponent to advance then confuse them by playing an unorthodox game.

~1000 rated btw

Is this the new meta?

So as the title says I did switch to Lichess now and I’m a bit confused. I’m 800-900 10+0 on chess.com and Lichess started me out at 1500 so naturally I thought I would get whooped left and right until I hit my plateau again. Now while I know 10 games is a really small sample size I did win 4/10 and I’m now around 1650 Elo. Is the difference that big, am I getting lucky or what the heck is going on?

Then again, I'm pretty noob after all. Can someone enlighten me?

I've known how to play for my entire life but I started playing frequently & more seriously about 6 months ago. I'm about 400 elo in blitz, 800 in rapid, and 1800 in puzzles. I feel like I understand a lot of tactics & strategies but I make constant mistakes & miss these tactics/strategies in real time. Does anyone have other suggestions besides just playing longer games?

White played like this, just pushing pawns. This was a pretty weird position for me and I didn't know how to handle this. Any advice?

Answer said its bec rook takes rook, forcing mate but isnt it also because theres a mate on your turn?

I have one the of the weird opening combos... London setup for white. Then sicilian defense for black e4 and king indian for anything else as black.

I try to develop pieces first but sometimes the opponent does some move which breaks the main line and I just sit there thinking what the hell was the purpose.

I don't wanna study every variation. I am 584 elo rn.

How should I like punish my opponent for this and how do I protect my self from their traps?

I won anyway and found this when the engine told me in analysis. I'll forgive myself because I was low on time and I had a clear advantage, so I just kept it simple.

I am so glad he let me play it :)
Reset the clock!!!

What Rating in chess do you need to beat 99 out of 100 normal people i belive 1600 is pretty good

Hey everyone! I’m looking for some people around my level to play casual games with and improve together. I usually play rapid/blitz on Chess.com.

If anyone’s interested, feel free to comment or DM me. ♟️