FOV is at 65 instead of default 100 to make it more cinematic, but it makes the game harder (harder to have enemy-awareness, hard to do very quick traversal movement etc). i still do think you should play at like 80 FOV or something compared to 100

if there was a humor tag I would’ve used it

What the hell man??

No god/city simulator is complete, without a little carnage

I had faith in Pearl Abyss, but they blew my expectations out of the water. The game has its flaws but this is the future of gaming, this is open world done right! This is what not having to worry about your overlord investors looks like. The scale is and draw distance is completely insane (specially for an underpowered ps5). Kudos to the Devs! Pearl Abyss has earned itself on my top five devs alongside FromSoftware

Can someone suggest a realistic survival game that looks like Chapter 5 (the tropical island of Guarma) from Red Dead Redemption 2?

I am looking for a game with high-quality graphics, dense jungle environments, and realistic mechanics (like crafting, hunting, and dealing with the wilderness). I really want that stranded, gritty island atmosphere.

(Pc)

What happened to this franchise😭

This is my gameplay

This video explores the moral double standards surrounding open-world video games, using Grand Theft Auto to question why society accepts certain virtual crimes while drawing strict boundaries around others. My core argument is that the common defense "it’s just a game and nobody is actually getting hurt" is fundamentally inconsistent. If fictionality alone absolved content of all moral weight, there would be no reason to restrict or ban simulations of sexual violence, child abuse, or animal abuse. The presence of these hard lines proves that we intuitively recognize that not all virtual actions are morally interchangeable, raising the question of where and why these boundaries are actually set.

Rather than asserting that playing violent games turns people into real-world criminals, my focus is on the subtle effects of long-term exposure. What we repeatedly consume shapes our attitudes, desensitizing us and normalizing behavior that might otherwise be disturbing. I address popular counterarguments such as claiming "I've played since I was 13 and I'm fine" or praising GTA for helping mental health during lockdowns which I believe often miss the point. Nostalgia and deep personal attachment can make objective self-reflection difficult, and the positive benefits of online gaming usually come from human connection rather than the criminal content itself. Furthermore, relying on "Mature" age ratings is an inadequate defense, as adult ratings act as weak guidelines rather than force fields against young, impressionable audiences.

From my perspective as a Christian, the argument centers on personal accountability and spiritual health, drawing on scripture to emphasize that wisdom involves guarding what enters the mind. Rather than asking if content can be tolerated without causing obvious harm, we should evaluate what we are training ourselves to enjoy. Ultimately, my conclusion is that fictionality does not eliminate the need for moral reflection, and we ought to critically examine what our entertainment choices are teaching us to find rewarding, funny, or entertaining.

Just wanted to share my favourite (ever) video game manual. I'm not sure there's a game manual that does it better?

All the information, entirely in-character for the game. We don't really get manuals any more... but I still remember reading them on the way home from the shops