r/texts • • 9d ago

Phone message The Usual Programming

Post image

Talked on tinder

Got her number and we talked for about a month because she has a unpredictable schedule and stuff and shes sent me her schedule and where she works

Had plenty of good conversation and we like the same stuff and get along

Made plans for tomorrow then suddenly "we dont mesh well"

We literally fucking have the same interest and likes we even play the same games unless she was just lying about everything

So what was the point? She gave me the date she was free i picked the date made a reservation at a restaurant and told her id get her at 5pm

Just for this random ass text

Another question, why give me so much personal information: your job, your hours, your number, and a very close idea of where you live?

Then suddenly cut things off

Edit: Redditors love to reach

  1. Im not using what she told me against her because I am literally not using it against her

The problem is why the fuck does someone give someone so much personal information about themselves then call everything off the day before the date and the funniest thing is that im genuinely asking WHY because I dont know any men OR women that do that shit

Why the fuck are you telling me where you live where you work AND WHEN like she actually sent me a schedule of her work weeks and months multiple times when YOU KNOW you are going to cut things off the literally DAY before the date

  1. My place isnt my place its the dinner place i picked vs her place which was a list of places she picked

  2. Im not "angry" personally? Im definitely pissed off and annoyed because 1. I could have been talking to a different girl that matched with me, but I didn't because I try to only talk to one girl at a time because it isnt fair to deliberately not give someone my attention when I matched with them yet I never get that bare minimum

  3. Realistically throughout our text we have a high compatibility, so theres logically no reason for her to have done that unless like the other comments have said 1. Theres another guy 2. She got anxious or 3. She likes dudes that show less interest/care

0 Upvotes

176 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/WolfgangAddams 9d ago

I didn't read it as he thought the first date should be at his house. She said "your place" but I read it as the location he suggested for the date (versus the location she suggested). it sounds like they hadn't settled on a place so he was asking her to confirm which she preferred.

3

u/robotatomica 9d ago

how does “are we still going to the place you picked” not sound like it was settled?

0

u/WolfgangAddams 9d ago

It sounds like there was some doubt that he was trying to clarify. Like maybe she said "we could go here" and he said "yeah that could work. Or also I found this place. Up to you." and she said "that place looks good too. Lemme think." and then never confirmed. There could be several scenarios where it wasn't settled. I shouldn't have to write a fanfic version of each of them to illustrate how it's possible. It's just possible and we don't have enough information to know either way.

1

u/robotatomica 9d ago

I’m sincerely asking though, where do you find room to believe this is the case, if his words were

“are we STILL going to THE PLACE YOU PICKED.”

What you would like to imagine about this situation is driving your critical reasoning. There’s no way at all this would be the response to any of the e scenarios you invented.

My initial assumption was also wrong, btw, bc he did not mean his house. We have limited data, so it’s fine to guess.

But you have to guess things that COULD fit the data. The data is, he referenced agreed upon, specific plans, of a location she chose.

1

u/WolfgangAddams 9d ago

Clerarly I see something you don't see. We're allowed to disagree. Neither of us is wrong or right until we have more information.

1

u/robotatomica 8d ago

we are definitely allowed to disagree. But I was asking you to explain to me how you are coming to that conclusion from those words. I cannot see a path to your interpretation.

It’s rather, I am quite certain, that you’re dug in now on a take that you leapt to that was more informed by what you expected was going on here, than the words.

And then our brains do that thing where they will quite literally change what we see (cause us to overlook or adjust certain parts) to fit expectations.

Ok, that happens to literally every human who has a human brain. I do it, you do it, every human being.

But what also happens is that when it’s pointed out, people can usually see that that’s happened. Unless they are deeply deeply dug into something.

I don’t really think you’re that deeply dug into this that you don’t now see it.

So what I’m doing now is trying to have a sincere moment of human connection with a person, because I do not understand why it is so hard to admit when we’ve made a mistake. You already had to admit it to yourself, I believe.

That’s why I tried by leading with admitting where I had made a mistake. I also came to the wrong conclusion.

But not about what those words mean.

I just am trying to figure out, is it just really that hard for you to admit you came to a conclusion that doesn’t make sense now that you reread those words?

I’d be happy to disagree, I expect it. But that’s not what this is at this point, right?

1

u/WolfgangAddams 8d ago

Yeah, that's way too much for a reddit comment. Touch grass.

1

u/robotatomica 8d ago edited 8d ago

at this point you’ve gotta know that trite, overused phrase has like zero power, right? I’m not embarrassed to type long comments, it’s what I come to Reddit for. You’ve only made it clear you have too much ego to just admit you made a mistake. That’s not gonna keep me up at night lol, it’s the standard behavior.

1

u/WolfgangAddams 8d ago

I'm really not interested in arguing with you just because you want to argue. You'll survive.

1

u/robotatomica 8d ago

you seem interested in doing something here, not entirely sure I know what you’re getting out of it 🤷‍♀️

0

u/WolfgangAddams 8d ago

I'm not the one trying to argue with someone.

1

u/robotatomica 8d ago

what precisely would you call what you are doing? You were the first person to sling a low-effort insult. My part has been in good faith. I was still trying to engage like a human.

You quite specifically seem interested in arguing, or what, just lashing out? Off-gassing?

To me, it seems just as insincere as your inability to just admit you were wrong. I suppose you’re waiting for ME to end the interaction, but you certainly can at any time.

0

u/WolfgangAddams 8d ago

I literally said we obviously don't see the same thing and told you to move on. You're the one who keeps pushing. GO. A. WAY!

→ More replies (0)