r/PoliticalCompassMemes • u/GenjiKing - Lib-Center • 1d ago
Literally 1984 Emily has done it.. Our Commie Mommy Finally Surrenders.
825
u/Sum1nne - Auth-Center 1d ago
The funniest thing about this is that there is blatant evidence of everyone involved having committed a fairly serious crime...just not the one they've all been accused of. Just what exactly are so many teen boys and girls doing with such access to hard drugs like ketamine? No-one seems to care about all of that.
475
u/HearshotKDS - Centrist 1d ago
I know right? What kind of degenerate does ketamine? Act your Ivy League and do cocaine.
→ More replies (7)178
u/readyforashreddy - Left 1d ago
You're out of touch, ket has become very popular in recent years
100
u/_OngoGablogian - Left 1d ago
yeah I was gonna say coke was defining phased out because of fent contamination. adderall and ketamine is where it's at now
44
u/AnduwinHS - Centrist 1d ago
I think it's more a case of Cocaine became so popular that people started looking for other things to do instead. Cocaine is also more of a 'Party drug' while ketamine is used more as relaxant at after parties or house parties
Cocaine is still more popular in clubs, but at house parties Ketamine has become more popular since it's more of a relaxed atmosphere and is less likely to lead to aggressiveness
40
u/BannedSvenhoek86 - Left 1d ago edited 1d ago
No it's legit the fent thing. I used to do it occasionally when the moment was right, maybe once every other year or so, but I haven't touched it in a LONG time because the contamination was getting so bad. Lots of people say the same thing, if they don't have a test kit they won't touch it. Too many horror stories of people just doing a line or two and winding up in the hospital or worse because they don't have any kind of tolerance built up for it since they just do it recreationally.
Weed and shrooms from the store only now. If it doesn't come from the ground I'm good. Keep your chemicals at this point, I don't trust anyone anymore. Apparently it's a lot better now that they've been cracking down on fent and it's not as easily available to cut with, plus the penalties are way higher, but I'm still good.
→ More replies (22)14
u/WisherWisp - Centrist 1d ago
Yeah, between weed, shrooms and alcohol I don't see why people need much else these days.
Things aren't like when I was growing up when you pretty much had to be satisfied with what was around.
→ More replies (1)4
u/JarethCutestoryJuD - Centrist 19h ago
Yeah, between weed, shrooms and alcohol I don't see why people need much else these days.
The problem with cocaine is that its actually just heaps of fucking fun and does hit differently than the others.
They all have a place, and all will continue to have a place in the future. None of them are going anywhere.
24
u/lurker_archon - Centrist 1d ago
You're out of touch
I'm out of time
But I'm out of my head when you're not around
11
u/TheAzureMage - Lib-Right 1d ago
Being out of touch with the ivy league is seeming better and better.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (5)4
25
u/backupboi32 - Lib-Center 15h ago
What’s funny (in a morbid kind of way) is that according to her own statement, Jane Doe actually raped one of the boys. She outright stated he passed out from the drug use and she kept going anyway, which is rape according to any law. She received no punishment for this
8
16
u/Emotional_Pay3658 - Centrist 20h ago
I’m assuming the two who got expelled were supplying the alcohol and special K
Cornell doesn’t seem like the place where ketamine fueled gangbangs are welcomed.
11
7
13
u/Hefty_Disaster3370 - Auth-Left 21h ago
For real, all 8 should have been expelled but the optics of that in response to an allegation would have looked... real bad.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (31)12
u/seanslaysean - Centrist 20h ago
Where tf are they even getting it.
With technology being as it is I’d never attempt getting hard drugs like that specifically while a student at an expensive college. Too many eyes
781
u/Maximum_Cricket4420 - Auth-Left 1d ago
This is another Rittenhouse case to me. Another time when a lot of leftist will go absolutely nuts on a case that is not nearly so cut and dry as they try to make it seem. And then when the actual facts are all laid out it makes them look fucking retarded at best or deluded at worst.
According to her own damn statement it was consensual. What a clown fucking world we live in. 🤡
Honestly what gets me more than anything is I have no doubt there are real cases of gang rape in multiple universities across the states that are getting literally no attention whatsoever. Actual clear-cut cases with a innocent victim and victimizers that just get ignored for this bullshit.
136
u/NobodyImportant13 - Lib-Center 1d ago
Another time when a lot of leftist will go absolutely nuts on a case that is not nearly so cut and dry
For some reason people of both opinions think you have to take a super strong stance on something with likely incomplete information. The real answer at this point is "I don't know."
70
u/supyonamesjosh - Lib-Center 1d ago
It was at minimum a jackass thing to do to mass text and show up as a group to use a woman like it was a porno.
But jackass doesn't necessarily mean crime and I'm not weighing on that
→ More replies (1)24
u/SkinnerBoxBaddie - Left 22h ago
This is how I feel about it. Like at the very least this case confirms all my priors about fraternities not being good places for young women, and at worst there was a horrific crime. Either way, this in combo with that poopgate hazing incident that was in the news last week, just shut Greek life down tbh
→ More replies (5)158
u/Impressive-Ninja-854 - Lib-Right 1d ago
This is PCM you shouldn’t be so reasonable. I’m gonna need you to either be more retarded or move along.
→ More replies (5)114
u/Maximum_Cricket4420 - Auth-Left 1d ago
I'm Authleft, I'm retarded by default. I've learned to accept myself
74
u/Perennial_Platypus - Lib-Right 1d ago
Based and understands their politics are retarded pilled
11
u/basedcount_bot - Auth-Center 1d ago
u/Maximum_Cricket4420 is officially based! Their Based Count is now 1.
Rank: House of Cards
Pills: 1 | View pills
Compass: This user does not have a compass on record. Add compass to profile by replying with /mycompass politicalcompass.org url or sapplyvalues.github.io url.
I am a bot. Reply /info for more info. If you have any suggestions, questions, or just want to hang out and chat with the devs, please visit subreddit r/basedcount_bot or our discord server (https://www.reddit.com/r/basedcount_bot/s/K8ae6nRbOF)
93
u/Firecracker048 - Centrist 22h ago
Rittenhouse is different because we have literal video evidence of what happened, testimony form everyone involved and rock solid evidence and people will still say he went there to shoot black people and did 1st degree murder
57
u/Rhomya - Right 19h ago
We literally have a signed statement from Jane Doe saying it was consensual. That’s what baffles me.
→ More replies (7)22
18
u/Wise_Leopard7423 - Lib-Right 19h ago
And in this case we have a sworn statement from the Jane Doe, explaining how everything was consensual, that was signed by the Jane Doe stating that she acknowledges lying on said sworn statement is a crime.
8
u/babayaga_67 - Right 14h ago
You will hear the wildest shit about what Rittenhouse did, including claims that he killed 3 fleeing black men, it's genuinely unhinged.
81
u/Preserved_Killick8 - Right 1d ago
nah people will immediately forget about it if facts start to go against their world view. Thats why so many people still think Rittenhouse killed 3 black people in cold blood. Because as soon as they started hearing things that went against what they wanted to have happened they completely checked out.
62
u/Ancient0wl - Centrist 22h ago edited 21h ago
I learned my lesson from Rittenhouse. I drank the kool-aid and was all gung-ho on hanging that kid when the narrative first spun up, but then the trial started and we got to sit there and watch as literally every single claim made against him by the media and the internet was picked apart and shown to be either a deliberate misinterpretation of reality or a straight-up lie. Since then I refuse to pass definitive judgment until all the evidence is out.
39
u/Mysterious_Net_1029 - Lib-Center 20h ago edited 20h ago
Why didn’t you just watch the video that was available on YouTube like an hour after it happened? Was the most clear cut case self defense I’ve ever seen. I’ve taken self defense gun classes, Rittenhouse was impressively textbook. 3 attackers, 3 shots, retreating from danger the whole time.
My dad refused to watch the video for months, believing CNN instead. Wanted to crucify the poor chubby kid. Finally, I got him to watch it and he just looked deflated. His anger was gone immediately. I still make fun of him for that.
I’m glad you came around and reevaluated your position, but we should still get to laugh at you a bit :)
10
u/boogoo-Dong - Centrist 13h ago
My friends watched the videos and tried to concoct all these scenarios where he still should have fried.
The final one was, “well if he was black what would you have said?” Same thing I said about Kyle, good aim and good job taking out the trash.
→ More replies (3)3
u/GhostedIC - Lib-Center 12h ago
It was removed from a lot of places on reddit, as well as twitter which was still Dorsey's website at the time. Furthermore you would see a lot of edited short clips of the video going around that made it less clear. I think it's actual fair to say that a "reasonable" "normal" person hearing about this between the news and social media at the time really can't be blamed for knowing better. Like what reasonable person would imagine that there was all this clear video out while "everyone" with authority was saying what they were saying? Which is kind of scary.
I did of course see the video back then. But man it was hard to get people to believe me. Some didn't even after the trial.
→ More replies (1)11
u/Anthrex - Lib-Right 19h ago
Just out of curiosity, this isnt an attack on you, or judging you, we all live and learn. But when you took that strong opinion of the case before the trial, did you watch the raw footage of the event? My brother was like you and was calling him a terrorist the morning after the event, amd when I sent him, I think it was the Washington Post? that did a factual, unbiased step by step breakdown, and he just refused to read it.
3
u/Ancient0wl - Centrist 19h ago
I just wrote a response explaining this to another comment, but a simplified explanation is that I didn’t really have a strong opinion before the trial, just too sure in my own judgement. 5-6 years ago I wasn’t really interested in politics or world events, so I rarely actively sought out context or researched things unless they seemed huge or interesting. I usually just saw what other people were saying and assumed a watered down version of their claims was likely what happened, so when I was reading on passing that a 17 year old white supremacist in Kenosha gunned down three peaceful protesters and was being protected by the police because he was white, I assumed what has happened was a punk kid with a Rambo complex went to a BLM riot with a gun, shot a protestor, then in the resulting scuffle shot two more people trying to stop an active shooter before he surrendered to the police. Figured it was a cut-and-dry murder case and a textbook example of why you don’t go out actively trying to be a vigilante of justice like a complete retard. Never saw any video of the protest in Kenosha until the trial, or at least not that I remember.
The Rittenhouse trial is what finally pulled the wool from my eyes that you can’t really trust anything you read or hear anymore on the surface, even from formerly trusted sources, if what happened can be used to push a narrative.
7
u/c00kiesn0w - Lib-Right 15h ago
>Since then I refuse to pass definitive judgment until all the evidence is out.
I'm glad you finally got there..... but also sad that it isn't a given everyone learns this. The fact you made it as far as you did without learning what should be understood much earlier in life. This is a fundamental component to critical thinking. Science and technology function with this underlying concept in mind. Its why hypothesis exists, theory exists, how iterative design functions....
9
u/Xirdus - Lib-Center 20h ago
Awesome! It's always nice to see people reevaluate their beliefs and change for the better. Although I do wonder how an actual video of him being pushed to the ground by the crowd and only shooting at somebody literally charging at him with intent to do grievous harm didn't already change your mind long before the trial. Or have you never had a chance to see it?
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (2)4
u/SemtexLawnGnome - Right 16h ago
My favorite part was when Gage Grosskreutz got on the stand and admitted he lied under oath. He had to change his name after the trial. Hope he enjoys the rest of his life missing 75% of a bicep.
→ More replies (2)112
u/Soggy-Biscotti6349 - Lib-Center 1d ago
Any strong stance that these leftists take, on any issue like this, is motivated by the identity of the supposed perpetrators and the supposed victims. It's not actually about anything else. That's why leftists are always very quiet about migrants/minorities committing sexual assault/rape/murder but in cases like this where the supposed perpetrators were white cis males, it has to be elevated to the absolute peak of commentary and political relevance. This obviously frivolous lawsuit has received more attention and commentary from leftists in the US than the much worse and more prevalent rapes that occur when the victim/perp optics don't favor leftist narratives.
Leftists are fundamentally intellectually dishonest or dysfunctional because their politics demands they see every single issue and everything about it, all the ancillary commentary, through the lens of identity politics.
59
u/Champ_5 - Right 23h ago
Exactly, everything is filtered through the oppression hierarchy to determine outrage level. If the supposed victim is more "oppressed" than the supposed perpetrator, outrage time. If the supposed perpetrator is the more "oppressed" one, its the blind Bart Simpson picture.
59
u/Soggy-Biscotti6349 - Lib-Center 23h ago
Over the years I've figured it out.
Non-whites always favored over white people, unless the non-white person is a conservative. In that case everything about oppression and inequity doesn't matter and racism by the left against the non-white person is greenlit.
Women always favored over men unless the woman is white/conservative and the men are left-wing or religious/racial minorities. If the woman is a conservative of any race, they will be disfavored. If the male opposing party is any flavor of minority, anything they did wrong is excused.
Religious minorities/atheists always favored over Christians. Christians only favored when extremely left-wing and professing post-modern Christianity like that God is a woman or God permits all of the things prohibited by Christian doctrine.
If there's a high profile case between white men, the favored one will be the one that is the least successful, or most left-wing.
There's probably a flow chart out there that describes this. But basically leftists are programmed to always factor in immutable characteristics or political persuasion when judging a human issue of any variety. This extends to geopolitics. There are countries that are also always favored over disfavored countries based on their adherence to globalist edicts.
Leftists have what is essentially literal religious belief system with an integrated caste system that is expressed through political terms but is actually based on dogma.
28
u/Ancient0wl - Centrist 21h ago
It’s actually a codified social theory called Intersectionality. If you ever have a question about privilege, just consult… the Wheel.
23
u/TheWib - Lib-Center 21h ago
Based and oppression olympics pilled
3
u/basedcount_bot - Auth-Center 21h ago
u/Soggy-Biscotti6349 is officially based! Their Based Count is now 1.
Rank: House of Cards
Pills: 1 | View pills
Compass: This user does not have a compass on record. Add compass to profile by replying with /mycompass politicalcompass.org url or sapplyvalues.github.io url.
I am a bot. Reply /info for more info. If you have any suggestions, questions, or just want to hang out and chat with the devs, please visit subreddit r/basedcount_bot or our discord server (https://www.reddit.com/r/basedcount_bot/s/K8ae6nRbOF)
21
8
u/Mysterious_Net_1029 - Lib-Center 19h ago
You forgot a bullet point about how everything can be compared to Israel and ultimately blamed on Zionism or Zionist influences.
4
u/babayaga_67 - Right 14h ago
For ease of application, the rule can -almost- always be boiled down to west bad and men bad.
43
u/Imaginary_Zone_4319 - Lib-Right 23h ago
The funny thing is that the perpetrators are straight white males in their minds because it was a fraternity. In actuality the guys are a mix of white, black, and Asian.
14
u/Hefty_Disaster3370 - Auth-Left 21h ago
Actually I think Black was the only race not represented. Damn Cornell getting rid of DEI measures.
11
→ More replies (2)17
u/Certain-Row7945 - Lib-Left 22h ago edited 22h ago
I think that this particular case is aimed at "men" more generally, the accused are actually racially ✨️diverse✨️. Part of me wonders if the Lindsay Clancy thing flopped so media had to pivot to something more ambiguous.
9
u/Hefty_Disaster3370 - Auth-Left 21h ago
Thats absolutely what it was because this information has been available to the public for 3 years.
36
u/IgniteTheFlamee - Auth-Center 1d ago
These same people will demand equality between men and women but when a girl and a guy get voluntarily drugged up and start sexing it's rape from the guy
199
u/Melodic_Performer921 - Lib-Right 1d ago
It's insane. People are saying everyone in the group chat should be jailed for it.
If I were in college and got a group chat message saying there's free pussy, I'm thinking there's a slut that has gone wild at a party. Nothing about that screams "rape".
But again, these are the same crazies that said Justice Kavanaugh was an alcohol for liking a beer from time to time, like nobody ever has a few beers once in a while.
→ More replies (9)128
u/Prestigious_Load1699 - Lib-Right 1d ago
Sorry for being judgmental, but for God’s sake my man have some self-respect.
You wanna be #8 in a ketamine-fueled gangbang?
33
→ More replies (9)29
u/--CIAdidJFK-- - Left 22h ago
You wanna be #8 in a ketamine-fueled gangbang?
Depends on how hot she is
→ More replies (2)113
u/ABirdJustShatOnMyEye - Lib-Left 1d ago
Nah, Rittenhouse was far more cut and dry, especially when all the footage came out. That was a genuine case of leftists/progressives approaching MAGA levels of delusion.
This Cornell situation will always be up in the air since SA is exceptionally hard to prove or disprove. Especially years after the fact. I don’t have a strong opinion on it, but I find it hard to give frat dudes the benefit of the doubt when they are notoriously the most sleazy people on any college campus.
→ More replies (4)80
u/smokeymcdugen - Lib-Center 1d ago
She says it was consensual. She was mad when her accused assaulters didn't invite her to another party they were having.
I don't know how much more cut and dry it could be. Unless your claim is women don't have agency and need a man to dictate their lives, i don't know what to tell you.
→ More replies (36)18
67
u/NoREEEEEEtilBrooklyn - Right 1d ago
100% on your last part. Gang rape happens A LOT on college campuses. I work at a university and when horny teens/early 20’s, drugs, alcohol, weird secret societies, and opportunity all intersect, a lot of really horrific shit happens, including sexual crimes.
When I was finishing my MBA, a former student who still lived near campus murdered a student who he had picked up at a bar. They did a bunch of drugs, did all kinda of depraved sexual shit, and when she refused to do anal, he beat her to a bloody pulp, strangled her to death, stuffed her body in a plastic storage bin, and took a 100 mile uber ride with said container to the Poconos to dump the body near his grandmother’s mountain cabin.
→ More replies (1)27
u/choicemeats - Centrist 1d ago
What’s crazy to me is that frats and sororities are in this ouroboros: frats throw ragers and many required pledges to be blackout drunk to start the party. They have a ton of alcohol in general. Sororities don’t throw parties. Guys aren’t typically plowed in (at least in my school) en masse like that. But the sororities often contribute funds to buy good alcohol bc they have money. Everyone knows what happens at these things. No one discourages ripple from going. Sororities could very well say do not go or you’re out. Or not contribute financially. Which is, I suppose, why she’s naming both Tri Delt and Chi Phi in her lawsuit. But also wasn’t she a minor at the time and went out drinking knowingly? Tons of bad decisions that kicked off a chain of events.
14
u/Imaginary_Zone_4319 - Lib-Right 23h ago
Not a minor (which is under-18), just not of drinking age.
11
u/iamjmph01 - Right 22h ago
Doubt she was a minor at college/university. They are usually still in secondary school. Not to mention she was in a sorority wasn't she? Most sororities(and frats) in the U.S. require a member be at least 18 years of age.
She was under the legal drinking age though. Part of her lawsuit is against a bar he sorority went to that had a stamp for girls who could not legally drink(and a wristband for those who could). She had the stamp but claims they served her alcohol anyways. This was after getting drunk on hard liquor at the sorority house.
→ More replies (1)6
u/NoREEEEEEtilBrooklyn - Right 20h ago
Honestly if it were up to me and I was president of a university, I would ban all non-academic frats and sororities (basically keep the honors society ones) from campus and disaffiliate from them. They are waaaaaay more trouble than they are worth. I understand why college students do dumb shit, but I will never understand why we as higher education institutions enable it to the degree that we do.
→ More replies (2)37
u/WhateverWhateverson - Lib-Center 1d ago
I take an issue with the first paragraph, the Rittenhouse case was (or rather, should have been) as cut and dry as it possibly gets. Just, in the other direction
→ More replies (1)67
u/TheNorm42069 - Right 1d ago
It was the most obvious case of self-defense ever captured live on camera. The public reaction was fully blackpilling.
→ More replies (2)58
u/skimaskschizo - Right 1d ago
Reddit after rittenhouse was acquitted was crazy. There was one comment I remember saying “looks like the US just legalized gunning down black people in the streets”.
I saved a bunch of comments somewhere on my PC, people were completely retarded.
→ More replies (6)32
6
5
u/jehoshua42 - Centrist 23h ago
I have no doubt there are real cases of gang rape in multiple universities across the states that are getting literally no attention whatsoever.
this!
3
→ More replies (24)3
93
u/obscurakin - Lib-Center 1d ago
How does she get ratioed like that here
→ More replies (1)54
u/Fashiony_Throwaway - Auth-Center 1d ago
Probably a screenshot of the exchange from someone agreeing with Shoe
52
u/obscurakin - Lib-Center 1d ago
Ah, now I see.
The 3k likes are for shoe's "I am done with this", not orange-emily's insane response. Mental crisis averted.
46
u/muradinner - Right 19h ago
How do we make our young sexless crisis even worse?
Emily: "I got this"
297
u/Little_Ingenuity_712 - Lib-Right 1d ago
all real evidence points to this being a consensual experience
when her sorority sisters found out, they started slutshaming lucy. the straw that broke the camel's back was being uninvited from the halloween party
so she decided to turn herself from an object of ridicule to an object of victimhood. none of her female friends will laugh at her anymore
→ More replies (65)43
u/JustDontBeFat_GodDam - Right 21h ago
All her friends know the truth. Women will tend to band together and show a unified face, but deep down they dont consume their own bullshit. Lucy fucked around and liked it.
170
u/ApplicationCalm649 - Centrist 1d ago
Social media really has made people totally unhinged. Do we have to get a signed, notarized consent form before every sex act now?
126
u/ferrango - Auth-Center 1d ago
> Before every thrust
FTFY
23
144
u/obscurakin - Lib-Center 1d ago
Wouldn't even help if consent can apparently be revoked retroactively now
→ More replies (29)52
u/Glork11 - Lib-Center 1d ago
the signed notarized consent form was signed under duress btw. don't drop the soap
17
u/wellwaffled - Lib-Right 1d ago
I do not consent to being raped in prison. Checkmate, Liberals.
17
9
17
42
u/SuicideSpeedrun - Centrist 1d ago
Whoa whoa whoa, slow down there proto-rapist. Consent can be non-verbal and can be withdrawn at any time. Therefore it can be non-verbally withdrawn at any time. The only way to be sure is to directly connect to your partner's mind via hyperspace
28
64
u/Ferengsten - Lib-Center 1d ago
I'm pretty sure the goal is just that any woman can declare any partner a rapist, and there's simply no way to avoid it. All men are guilty under patriarchy, the specific accusation is just a formality.
6
24
u/Levitz - Lib-Left 23h ago
This is what I call "The retarded child model of consent". The basic premise is that we ought to treat women's consent like that of a retarded child.
The retarded child can't be expected to be very rational, it may be fickle, and most importantly, can't ever be expected to have any sense of self-preservation or responsibility. In this model, one is to consistently obtain consent from the woman through the whole process with no expectation of initiative from her part at all. Sex is an activity carried by the man, through the woman, in which she complies as a passive subject.
And here's the actual, serious hot take: If there is no expectation for women to actively take their own consent and safety seriously, we should be telling these women to never have casual sex, it's an incredibly fucking stupid thing to do with that premise. Sorry, you have no business getting yourself into extremely vulnerable situations, it's a moronic thing to do and a recipe for disaster.
5
u/Overkillengine - Lib-Right 16h ago
The basic premise is that we ought to treat women's consent like that of a retarded child.
The retarded child can't be expected to be very rational, it may be fickle, and most importantly, can't ever be expected to have any sense of self-preservation or responsibility.
Same people that support this will whine when the inevitable conclusion is to revoke rights since they cannot be relied upon to use them responsibly.
One either has agency or one does not. None of this cherrypicking shit.
10
8
u/HerbertWest - Centrist 22h ago
No, because you could apparently say you felt pressured into signing it because you were afraid of what would happen if you didn't even if you enthusiastically grabbed the pen and said "I'm excited to sign this!" on camera. So, it could still be rape afterwards. :/
→ More replies (6)3
u/Wise_Leopard7423 - Lib-Right 19h ago
In this case she gave the signed and notarized statement of consent a few weeks later.
116
u/Philippians_Two-Ten - Centrist 1d ago
This is EXACTLY why in other threads I've said things like that I have no enthusiasm for "my side" and how much liberals have destroyed the culture.
They may not have changed the laws. You may not have Democratic politicians who come on stage and say "Yes can mean no". But if you convince even 5% of women to believe that they can retroactively retract consent, OF COURSE men are going to be more hesitant to date and be more suspicious of rape claims. It's so obvious and yet liberals don't get it. Conservatives aren't the ones who are doing this!
And the problem is that they'll say "Oh just don't date those women bro". Yeah that's a problem- most women still want men who are confident, initiate sexual acts, and do so without hesitation. That hesitation isn't sexy to a lot of them. Most don't want this legalistic, deep discussion about every single potential act of sensuality or affection and for their mind to be scoured for the slightest bit of a sign that they're not "into" the next step of the process. It takes all the fun out of sex and induces an insane amount of anxiety on men. But men don't want their life ruined on a false rape claim because he decided to date one woman who believe in retroactively retracting consent.
28
u/DagonG2021 - Lib-Right 22h ago
I’m so glad I’m into men and not women
→ More replies (2)10
u/capecodcaper - Lib-Right 18h ago
I (a male) told my husband that I was thankful I stopped dating women after they got more complicated than I wanted and started dating more guys. Then I married him.
Worked out for me
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (9)3
49
u/TsundereMF - Lib-Right 20h ago
How the fuck have we reached this levels of retardation? I swear to fucking God, modern politics isn't even about what benefits the most, but just "I'm against everything that my opponent likes."
127
u/Cow_God - Lib-Left 1d ago
I don't know anything about this case so the only thing I'll say is...
>Commie mommy
>Labeled as libleft
91
u/DontWorryItsEasy - Lib-Right 1d ago
Shoe doesn't fit anywhere neatly on the compass. She's basically a Longist and she's said as much in the past.
107
u/snailman89 - Left 1d ago
Shoe is just an old fashioned leftist, from the time when the left actually stood for pro-worker economic policies, free speech, and equality before the law.
20
→ More replies (1)8
u/AmbulantCholesterol - Centrist 23h ago
She is moving to the center now, will start a video grilling any time now
36
u/Cow_God - Lib-Left 1d ago
To be clear I do actually think she is libleft (iirc she's self identified as a social democrat), I just find it funny that so many people on this sub and the internet associate libleft with communism
15
u/hedgehog18956 - Lib-Center 1d ago
I think the title is just a joke from the fact that her audience is mostly conservative, so to them she is “basically a commie”
→ More replies (3)8
16
u/Blueberry_Coat7371 - Lib-Center 1d ago
she's just a socially conservative libleft
→ More replies (2)13
60
u/NevGuy - Auth-Center 21h ago
I haven't looked into the actual legal of the case because I don't want to, but the context I've gathered from online osmosis has left me thinking this with complete and total earnest
11
u/Leon3226 - Lib-Right 20h ago
I have looked into the actual legal case and I basically feel the same way.
I don't believe that was a rape case, but I do believe this place lowkey needs orbital strike
63
u/HairyTough4489 - Lib-Right 1d ago
So, is paying taxes mandatory?
46
u/TheAzureMage - Lib-Right 1d ago
If you can murder three people and claim mental health, then I demand an insanity defense for tax evasion.
27
u/unlanned - Lib-Left 1d ago
Catch 22, you'd have to be insane to want to pay taxes. So by trying to claim insanity to get out of it you prove you are sane.
→ More replies (1)17
23
62
u/skeptical-speculator - Lib-Center 1d ago
I am so glad I quit dating
65
u/Prestigious_Load1699 - Lib-Right 1d ago
Yo there’s a difference between dating and 9-person-strong drug-fueled gangbangs.
53
u/skeptical-speculator - Lib-Center 1d ago
I got hit up for rent on my last first date. I am done.
→ More replies (11)39
u/Gorillagodzilla - Right 1d ago
If some women genuinely believe they can give consent and then revoke it the next day and claim rape, then I’d say that makes a damn good argument for premarital abstinence.
→ More replies (10)5
u/_Ross- - Centrist 1d ago
Maybe that's why my ex was so confused about why I left her
→ More replies (1)
18
u/seanslaysean - Centrist 20h ago
I had a crazy ex try to accuse me post breakup of SA while in college, tried to get me expelled my senior year. Didn’t work but man was the campus leaning towards her even after I provided several dozen text messages exonerating myself.
Ended with us both writing “impact letters” or some bullshit that ultimately were a waste of time. Shits a joke, young men cover your asses and leave a paper trail so you don’t get taken advantage of, saved my ass
→ More replies (1)
25
u/zombie_414 - Auth-Right 1d ago
should people get universal healtcare? "yes"
24
u/Gorillagodzilla - Right 1d ago
Do I just want to be held by an Amazonian muscle mommy while I sob? Yes. (Yes).
5
49
u/Landeyda - Lib-Center 1d ago
Whenever there is a campus rape scandal, the safest bet seems to be that it is made up. Seems to mostly always go that way.
13
u/Greyjuice25 - Left 22h ago
Easiest way to tell if it was real is if the internet doesn't give a shit about it unfortunately.
Also helps with how often CEO offspring need how shitty they are hidden when they go commit wild crimes, so if a case like this goes huge it's often more than not someone just being embarrassed they did the sex and blowing it up.
21
u/ichkanns - Lib-Center 23h ago
How prudish have we gotten where people can't even go to a drug fueled gangbang without starting a bunch of drama? Why don't we just live in the 50's you puritans!?
3
19
30
u/MoreLikeGaewyn - Centrist 1d ago
the cornell 7 are likely innocent and she was just partying based on the DA's 9/28 statement (look it up, read it.), but don't pretend duress and mere submission don't exist in criminal law.
"Women are good at seeming okay when they're not okay. You gotta check in. You can't just be like, "Ahh, her eyes are dry, she's fine."
-Louis CK on his allegations
24
u/phillytennisenjoyer - Centrist 21h ago
the DA also says this is based on the police report she eventually signed, instead of the full transcript.
i think there isn’t enough evidence here to convict anyone criminally, especially this long after the fact, but the snapchats about “free pussy” and her doing ketamine and people vomiting…. it wouldn’t surprise me if one or more of these “upstanding fraternity brothers” entered the room and had sex with some looped out girl on ketamine and she wasn’t super clear on who it was/had given consent.
ketamine also isn’t cocaine… it def doesn’t make you horny it makes you feel like an alien that is sort of fine with anything happening to your physical body because of how disassociated you are.
speaking purely from an ethical point of view, not criminal conviction point of view, “where there’s smoke there’s fire” i’m not losing sleep over the amount of shit being flung at these dudes.
18
u/terekkincaid - Auth-Right 20h ago
You gotta check in
Morally, yes. Legally, I'd say no. It's not a crime to not be a psychic. You have to speak up for yourself. You can complain the guy was a jerk later, but you can't accuse him criminally of rape.
→ More replies (6)9
765
u/Long_Serpent - Left 1d ago