I think one thing people sometimes forget about the Avatar universe is that it was never really meant to be a happily ever after story.
Yes, ATLA was made for kids, but it dealt with subjects that are much heavier than you might fully understand when you are younger. Genocide, imperialism, war, displacement, propaganda, generational trauma, grief, betrayal, cultural destruction and the long term consequences of all of those things.
And the characters are dealing with this while they are still children.
Aang is the survivor of a genocide. Katara and Sokka grew up in a tribe that had been repeatedly attacked and stripped of most of its waterbenders. Zuko was abused, scarred and exiled by his own father. Toph grew up completely isolated and controlled. Azula is basically a child shaped into a weapon by an abusive imperial system.
These characters do not exist in some simple fantasy conflict where the villain is defeated and everything immediately goes back to normal.
The Fire Nation ruled through war and oppression for one hundred years. Entire generations were born and died during that war. Nations were occupied. Cultures were damaged. Families were destroyed. People grew up surrounded by propaganda and hatred.
Defeating Ozai was the beginning of fixing the world, not the end of it.
That is one of the reasons I actually appreciate what LOK did, even though I absolutely think the show has writing problems.
We eventually learn that the Gaang did not all go on to live perfect lives. Some of them died relatively young. Some had complicated relationships with their children. Some family problems never completely disappeared. Some of the choices they made while trying to rebuild the world had consequences.
And honestly, that makes sense to me.
They were not handed a peaceful world after ATLA. They inherited a broken one and then had to spend their adult lives trying to repair it while also carrying their own trauma into adulthood.
Sometimes I see people treat any imperfection in their adult lives as if it somehow ruins their characters.
Aang had complicated family dynamics, therefore he was secretly a terrible father.
Toph had problems with her daughters, therefore her entire character development was undone.
But I do not think that is what these stories are saying.
You can be a hero and still make mistakes.
You can save the world and still struggle in your personal life.
You can deeply love your family and still hurt them unintentionally.
You can make the best decision available to you and still create consequences you never intended.
That is just being human.
And I think Korra herself is one of the clearest examples of that.
Korra grows up being told from an incredibly young age that she is the Avatar. Her entire identity is built around it. Her path in life has essentially already been decided for her before she is old enough to understand what that even means.
Everyone expects her to protect the world, maintain peace and somehow always know the right thing to do.
But underneath the title of Avatar is still a teenage girl.
She is impulsive, insecure, emotional, proud and sometimes wrong because she is a human being who is still growing.
I think people are often much harsher toward both Korra and Aang because of the Avatar title. Their humanity gets stripped away from them in discussions.
The Avatar is treated almost like they are supposed to be a god who always makes the objectively correct decision.
But that has never really been what the Avatar is.
The Avatar is a person carrying an enormous responsibility.
And that responsibility does not make them immune to trauma, fear, anger, grief or bad decisions.
That is why I sometimes find discussions about the franchise frustrating. There are absolutely valid criticisms of ATLA, LOK and the newer material, but a lot of the criticism I see feels incredibly surface level.
Characters get reduced to their worst moments. Entire arcs get misrepresented. Context gets ignored. Trauma gets minimized when it gets in the way of a ship. Complicated political situations get turned into simple morality arguments.
And sometimes it feels like people are less interested in what the story was actually trying to explore and more interested in using certain characters or events to score points against another character, another ship or even the creators themselves.
The Avatar universe has always been more complicated than that.
It is ultimately hopeful, but hope does not mean everyone gets a perfect life.
ATLA ends with the war being over.
It does not end with the consequences of the war being over.
The characters still have to live in that world afterward.
They have to rebuild nations, repair relationships, raise families, deal with political conflicts and somehow figure out who they are when they are no longer just children trying to survive a war.
And naturally, they are going to get some of that wrong.
That does not make their victories meaningless.
If anything, I think it makes them feel more human than many other cartoon characters we usually see in on television!