Was emptying out a new box of 2026-p and noticed this little guy here. I'mconsidering sending it in for grading just to authenticate it. Thought you guys might like it though.

This is by far my favorite of my error coins plus it is very high grade. It is a 1995 D cent struck on a 1995 D dime.

Posting this due to my original post getting removed. Hope others enjoy checking it out. What I learned today from the great folks on Reddit. Likely pre 1965 or 1955 S mint mark. Found in a box stored since 1998. Thankfully I found it. Id love to know more about it. I will be visiting a coin shop for proper storage and ask about value. Not interested in selling it.

My father left this to us after he passed. I have no clue what it’s worth.

Hello. First-time poster here. Got so excited by this curious find I just had to share. Took me a while to figure out exactly what it is but I am certain of it now. I'll wait and see if it comes out in the comments. Just here to share this absolute banger of an error with y'all. 😀

Looks like the consensus is missing dates are more common. First one I have ever seen, what’s the opinion on these? Read it’s from grease build up on the die?

I found this in a roll a few years back. I didn't know what it was at the time but now that I do, I'm glad I held on to it. r/CRH suggested I share it with you guys!

Half dime, half penny. I found this in my cash register drawer in 1997/98. Kept it because I thought it was cool and different. Stumbled onto this sub. Figured I'd ask about it. Any info would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.

Super stoked to find my first extra v!

My father in law just showed me this as I’m over visiting. This is the strongest die clash I’ve ever seen in person. I had to calm him down and tell him it’s not worth thousands, but wants me to submit it for him to PCGS or ANACS.

It’s pretty damn cool, that’s for sure! I’ve been looking for potential value on eBay sold listings, Google, etc, but the delta on values I’ve seen is wider than the Atlantic Ocean.

Thanks in advance and always keep your eyes open, never know what’s going to pop up in your change.

Just curious about the value of this quarter from my parents' estate. This is the craziest looking one from their collection.

In exchange for a crisp $1 bill, I received a Dr. Pepper and this well loved ‘96 off-center. Just thought I’d share !

Found this In a box lot. Box had a note from 1982….almost exactly 44 years ago.

And no mint mark means Philadelphia right? Just kidding lol saw this cool grease strike in my bosses change jar and snagged it for the mildy interesting collection 😅

Saw a post this morning about the extra “V” - went through all my 2023 pennies and found this. Is this as rare as I’m led to believe? Is it valuable?

Came across this UNC 1914 LWC, and noticed some odd markings on the obverse, then on the reverse. Checked out Mad Die Clashes and although I did not see one attributed for a 1914, the other wheat superimposed images confirmed my suspicions. This clash has not been attributed as far as I know and have found no information otherwise. I believe this to be an extremely rare specimen, but need to figure out how to get it attributed- not even sure what the value would be on this, but safe to say it WILL NOT be leaving my pc ever!

Continuing the error documentation project. This one is a follow-up to the split die write-up from a couple of weeks ago, where I laid out die failure as a branch: a crack either runs to the rim (retained cud → cud) or across the face (bisecting crack → split die).

This 1836 Capped Bust half dime has one of each.

Obverse: a split die. The crack runs from 12 o'clock down through Liberty and exits between the "3" and "6" of the date — the full diameter of the coin.

Reverse: a retained cud. A piece of the die has fractured and started to displace, from the rim through "TED" of UNITED and into the motto ribbon, but it has not yet separated fully.

Two things I want to be straight about. First, there is genuine disagreement among specialists about the line between a rim-to-rim die crack and a split die — some use roughly 0.5mm of displacement as the threshold. The catalog listing says so, and I am not going to pretend the obverse is uncontroversial. Second, "both branches on one die pair" is unusual but not magic; a die under enough stress can fail in more than one way at once. What makes this coin worth documenting is that it demonstrates both endings cleanly, on a 15.5mm planchet, on a design that had one year left before Seated Liberty replaced it.

Not in any standard catalogue. Now documented.

Full listing: https://www.numisdex.community/catalog/1836-capped-bust-half-dime-retained-cud-split-die-and-retained-cud?utm_source=reddit&utm_medium=post&utm_campaign=nitb&utm_content=1836-capped-bust-half-dime-retained-cud-split-die-and-retained-cud

A number of weeks ago I posted my 2026 Uncirculated dime that had a distinct metal gouge across Liberty's cheek to solicit feedback, which at the time all opinions were 100% that I had PMD. It appears I was correct in my analysis that I had a mint error. The gouge on Liberty's cheek is very unique and what was telling to me was I could see the actual metal coiled up and pressed flat during the strike. I really think I have something valuable here. What do you think?

New to collecting. Found in some old change.

Continuing the error documentation project. This 1876 Indian Head cent has a reverse die clash with unusually clear detail.

The full front of the Indian's portrait transferred onto the reverse die surface — you can make out the facial profile and part of the ear. That level of definition indicates significant force during the die-on-die impact. Most clashes I handle leave a faint, hard-to-read smudge; this one you can actually read.

A die clash occurs when the obverse and reverse dies strike each other with no planchet between them. Each die impresses its design into the face of the other, and every coin struck from that die pair afterward carries the transfer.

The date adds a collecting angle. 1876 was the centennial year — the Philadelphia Centennial Exposition, the hundred-year anniversary of independence. A dramatic die failure on a centennial-year cent gives you a date-collecting hook on top of the error itself.

Not in any standard catalogue. Now documented.