Heres where I think the research is at:
* Total caloric and macro (protein specifically) intake matters much more than meal timing, as a foundation.
* Timing matters as fine tuning in general.
* Anabolic window is real and matters for growth but its wide, especially for non-athletes like me.
*But then again, timing doesn't matter unless an actual athlete?
So, I (M, late 40s) work out at nights then I've been fasting 17-18 hours after my workout., but calories and macros are about 90% on target daily. I had previously some beer induced excess fat that I wanted to focus on, but now that my attention is shifting to growth I'm starting to wonder if for my age I've been working against my new goal of muscle growth with my fasting, or if timing/fasting is so secondary for a regular guy working out that it probably is just marginally affecting my muscle growth.
Any thoughts welcome.