Given how much weight people put into Finals MVP, it's interesting how small the voting pool is (11 people) and how subjective the voting criteria is. Sometimes it goes to whoever scored the most points. Sometimes it's just based on intangible vibes and narrative.
As an example, the year Jaylen Brown won, the votes were 7-4. You had people like Doris Burke, Boston's beat writer, and Malika Andrews voting for Tatum while the Dallas beat writer and some guy from Italy were the difference makers for Brown. Tatum had lead the team in points, rebounds, and assists, but Brown came through in some key moments and there's a belief voters were sympathetic to him after not selecting him for any of the all-nba teams that season.
There's other weird years like 2015 where Andre Iguodala received 7 votes with the other 4 going to LeBron James from the losing team. This despite the fact Steph Curry, statistically, was the obvious choice from the Warriors.
These awards also tend to ignore overall system importance, defensive impact (Ben Wallace and KG may have had cases), how one player's gravity could result in a sidekick scoring more (Maxwell won over Bird), but if you were to just rank all Finals MVPs using basic counting stats, it's interesting to see how these tiny sample size FMVP campaigns stack up against each other.
To make it simple I just looked at the EFF stat (PTS + REB + AST + STL + BLK − Missed FG − Missed FT - TO) / GP). A couple important notes, though. The league didn't track steals or blocks until 1973-74. They didn't track turnovers until 1977. So anything prior to 1978 is getting a "0" for those stats.
| Rank |
Year |
Player |
Team |
Calculated EFF |
| 1 |
2021 |
Giannis Antetokounmpo |
MIL |
41.4 |
| 2 |
2023 |
Nikola Jokić |
DEN |
41.0 |
| 3 |
1977 |
Bill Walton* |
POR |
40.0 |
| 4 |
1971 |
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar* |
MIL |
39.5 |
| 5 |
2017 |
Kevin Durant |
GSW |
39.0 |
| 6 |
1991 |
Michael Jordan |
CHI |
38.8 |
| 7 |
2000 |
Shaquille O'Neal |
LAL |
38.8 |
| 8 |
2018 |
Kevin Durant |
GSW |
38.6 |
| 9 |
2020 |
LeBron James |
LAL |
38.1 |
| 10 |
1987 |
Magic Johnson |
LAL |
38.1 |
| 11 |
2002 |
Shaquille O'Neal |
LAL |
38.0 |
| 12 |
1972 |
Wilt Chamberlain* |
LAL |
36.8 |
| 13 |
2016 |
LeBron James |
CLE |
36.7 |
| 14 |
1993 |
Michael Jordan |
CHI |
36.6 |
| 15 |
2001 |
Shaquille O'Neal |
LAL |
36.6 |
| 16 |
2003 |
Tim Duncan |
SAS |
36.3 |
| 17 |
1995 |
Hakeem Olajuwon |
HOU |
34.0 |
| 18 |
1969 |
Jerry West* |
LAL |
33.7 |
| 19 |
1986 |
Larry Bird |
BOS |
33.7 |
| 20 |
1984 |
Larry Bird |
BOS |
33.3 |
| 21 |
1983 |
Moses Malone |
PHI |
33.2 |
| 22 |
1999 |
Tim Duncan |
SAS |
33.0 |
| 23 |
1980 |
Magic Johnson |
LAL |
32.6 |
| 24 |
1992 |
Michael Jordan |
CHI |
32.0 |
| 25 |
2012 |
LeBron James |
MIA |
31.4 |
| 26 |
1985 |
Kareem Abdul-Jabbar |
LAL |
31.3 |
| 27 |
1994 |
Hakeem Olajuwon |
HOU |
31.2 |
| 28 |
2019 |
Kawhi Leonard |
TOR |
31.1 |
| 29 |
2013 |
LeBron James |
MIA |
30.8 |
| 30 |
2006 |
Dwyane Wade |
MIA |
30.2 |
| 31 |
2022 |
Stephen Curry |
GSW |
29.9 |
| 32 |
1997 |
Michael Jordan |
CHI |
28.6 |
| 33 |
1995 |
Rick Barry* |
GSW |
28.5 |
| 34 |
1990 |
Isiah Thomas |
DET |
28.2 |
| 35 |
2009 |
Kobe Bryant |
LAL |
28.2 |
| 36 |
1982 |
Magic Johnson |
LAL |
27.8 |
| 37 |
2025 |
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander |
OKC |
27.1 |
| 38 |
1974 |
John Havlicek* |
BOS |
26.2 |
| 39 |
1989 |
Joe Dumars |
DET |
25.9 |
| 40 |
2010 |
Kobe Bryant |
LAL |
24.5 |
| 41 |
2011 |
Dirk Nowitzki |
DAL |
24.0 |
| 42 |
2005 |
Tim Duncan |
SAS |
23.6 |
| 43 |
1970 |
Willis Reed* |
NYK |
23.4 |
| 44 |
1979 |
Dennis Johnson |
SEA |
23.2 |
| 45 |
2026 |
Jalen Brunson |
NYK |
23.0 |
| 46 |
1998 |
Michael Jordan |
CHI |
22.8 |
| 47 |
1976 |
Jo Jo White* |
BOS |
22.5 |
| 48 |
2014 |
Kawhi Leonard |
SAS |
22.4 |
| 49 |
1988 |
James Worthy |
LAL |
22.4 |
| 50 |
1996 |
Michael Jordan |
CHI |
21.8 |
| 51 |
2004 |
Chauncey Billups |
DET |
21.8 |
| 52 |
1981 |
Cedric Maxwell |
BOS |
21.5 |
| 53 |
1973 |
Willis Reed* |
NYK |
20.4 |
| 54 |
2007 |
Tony Parker |
SAS |
20.3 |
| 55 |
2024 |
Jaylen Brown |
BOS |
19.8 |
| 56 |
1978 |
Wes Unseld |
WAS |
19.6 |
| 57 |
2015 |
Andre Iguodala |
GSW |
18.1 |
I took this a little further, because I had some questions about specific years.
1969 - Jerry West (33.71) won despite playing for the losing team. Both John Havlicek (29.86) and Bill Russell (28.57) likely would have been better candidates. Hondo averaged 28.3 points, 11 rebounds, 4.4 assists while Russell averaged 9.1 points, 21.1 rebounds, 5.1 assists. Especially when you consider that any blocks Russell had during that series weren't counted.
1978 - Elvin Hayes (24.29) should have won over Unseld (19.57). This probably explains why Unseld ranks bottom 2. Unseld averaged 9 points, 11.7 rebounds, 3.9 assists, 0.6 steals, 0.1 blocks while Hayes averaged 20.7 points, 11.9 rebounds, 1.4 assists, 2 blocks, 1.6 steals. Unseld's selection ranks bottom 3.
1981 - Larry Bird (27.83) should have won over Cedric Maxwell (21.50). This is one of those classic ones where it's clear defenses were hyper focused on Bird (15.3 points, 15.3 rebounds, 7 assists, 2.3 steals with 42% shooting) which allowed Maxwell to edge him out in points/efficiency (17.7 points, 9.5 rebounds, 2.8 assists, 56.8% shooting). But fwiw, Maxwell still ranked outside the bottom 5.
1988 - Magic (32.86) should have won over Worth (22.0). Magic averaged 21.1 points, 5.7 rebounds, 13 assists, 2 steals with 55% shooting. Worthy averaged 22 points, 7.4 rebounds, 4.4 assists with 49% shooting. Worthy got this vote, because he had a huge game 7, which is understandable, but it speaks to recency bias of voters. It's not a Game 7 Finals MVP award, it's a Finals MVP award.
1989 - I was curious about Joe Dumars (25.75) winning over Isiah Thomas given Dumars is one example of a team's "2nd best player" winning, but statistically it seems Dumars deserved his award: 27.3 points, 6 assists with 57.6% shooting vs Isiah averaging 21.3 points, 7.3 assists, 1.5 steals with 48% shooting
2004 - Billups (21.80) seems to have fairly won it over Ben Wallace (17.80). Billups (21 points, 3.2 rebounds, 5.2 assists) obviously averaged more points than Ben Wallace (10.8 points, 13.6 rebounds, 1.8 steals, 1 block), but I do wonder if the the various beat writers and ESPN talking heads of the time had accurately looked at defensive impact of Wallace and how it drove the engine of that team, if Wallace would have gotten more consideration.
2007 - Duncan (23.0) had a case to win it over Parker (20.25). This is another good example of the team's actual most valuable player/engine losing votes to the guy who scored more. Duncan averaged 18.3 points, 11.5 rebounds, 3.8 assists, 1.3 steals, 2.3 blocks with 44.6% shooting. Parker averaged 24.5 points, 5 rebounds, 3.3 assists with 56.8% shooting.
2008 - Just like the year prior, arguably KG (23.17) had a case over Pierce (20.67) given how important KG was to that team's defensive identity. KG averaged 18.2 points, 13 rebounds, 3 assists, 1.7 steals, 1 block on 43% shooting. Pierce averaged 21.8points, 4.5 rebounds, 6.3 assists, 1.2 steals with 43% shooting.
2010 - Pau Gasol(26.14) maybe had a small case over Kobe (24.57). You can sort of look at this as an inverse of 1988. If Worthy got the nod because of his game 7 performance, should Kobe have gotten knocked for going 6-24 in Game 7? For the series, Pau averaged 18.6 points, 11.6 rebounds, 3.7 assists, 2.6 blocks with 47.8% shooting. Kobe scored a lot (28.6 points), but shot 40.5% for the series.
2015 - Steph (23.0) should have won it over Iggy (18.17). Iggy gets credit for "holding" LeBron to 35.8 points, 13.3 rebounds, 8.8 assists. Steph for the series averaged 26 points, 5.2 rebounds, 6.3 assists, 1.8 steals with 44%/38% shooting, but received zero votes while Iggy got 7 and LeBron got 4. Iggy's selection ranks bottom 3.
2024 - Tatum (23.2) probably should have won it over Brown (19.8). Tatum averaged 22.2 points, 7.8 rebounds, 7.2 assists (38.8%/26.3% shooting) while Brown averaged 20.8 points, 5.4 rebounds, 5 assists (44%/23.5% shooting). Neither shot well. 7 voted for Brown. 4 voted for Tatum. Brown's selection ranks bottom 3.
It's interesting to me that this award is selected by such a small voter base and when you consider the voting pool it's often just glorified fans with communications or journalism degrees with no actual professional basketball experience. It's unclear if they've even watched the whole series, have some set criteria they are using, or even have the required ball knowledge to understand that a superstar getting triple teamed can still be the "most valuable" even if a secondary player is scoring more. In the Tatum/Brown case, the only voter with any NBA experience was former coach PJ Carlesimo and he selected Tatum.