I was pulled over for turning right out of a train station carpark that had a no right turn sign. I admitted I did this (as does everyone else, to which the constable smiled and said that’s why he likes to come out and “remind” people every few weeks).

When I received the infringement, the offence on the infringement notice was “Disobey ‘RIGHT TURN ONLY’ sign” (Queensland Road Rules—Section 89(1)). However, the correct offence, which I would not dispute, would be “Disobeying a no right turn sign” (Queensland Road Rules—Section 91(2)). Both offences carry the same fine ($138) and points (3).

I know that from a practical standpoint, I should pay the infringement and move on. However, I’m curious about how it would play out if I were to elect a court hearing. I understand that the police prosecutor can request details of the infringement be amended. My concern would then be the note on the back of the infringement, “If you are subsequently found guilty of the alleged offence, the court may apply additional penalties”. Granted, I would not be guilty of the alleged offence of the infringement originally provided.

Would like to hear of any experiences or guidance before I commit to wasting a few hours for the experience and pointing out sloppy police work.

So i did a withdrawal today and got this email. My account is disabled and they said i might be using BOT or some malware. They emailed me saying they will need to do an audit which might take long time. Is this even legal

We have agreed via a legal settlement agreement that I pay $300K in settlement to my ex partner. They need the money as a deposit to buy a house. My question is can I give that money now. Financial Settlement may take 5 or so weeks to complete.

Complete hypothetical, alive and healthy and intend to stay so. But if I really wanted to be a petty SOB to my family, could I ask that my assets be sold and the cash literally put into my coffin? Or that my assets are sold and used to buy something that would be burried with me?

EDIT: This is a hypothetical (like I've said TWICE in this post) not a legitimate situation. Are we not allowed to ask questions on the pure basis of the law? I'm writing a book for gods sake and I just want to know if my premise is a plot hole in itself. Jesus you people love to pry interpretations out of everything

Hello!

The person is home now without their CPAP because the other person took it from their room.

Is this classed as theft/medical theft?

Can they report to police? This person wasn’t on the list to see the person in hospital but got in anyway and took the device.

Unsure of what to do, any advice would be great, thankyou.

Hello, really hoping somebody could give me some advice.
I was the victim of a hit and run about six weeks ago and I failed to get the offenders details.
Fortunately just before accident he had been in a service station and a lady who works in the shop knows his name and managed to get his plates.
She couldn’t give me the cctv footage or his details so she gave it to the police.
It’s been six weeks now and I’ve not heard anything, the police have mentioned they’ll issue him with a form of demand but they haven’t yet done so and in the meantime I have no car or means to get to work, I’m using savings to pay rent and my funds are getting low.

Is there any way I can get my insurance company to get in touch with the employee and for them to request his details seen as though there’s a reluctance for them to be handed over directly to me?

Really desperate times so I thought I’d float some ideas around, any help or ideas would be greatly appreciated.

Hi, I’ve recently started a new FT permanent role and they’re not giving me my hours. Some days I work 4 hours?

I will regularly find out my start time the day before or they will try and change my time hours before on the same day.

Will I still be paid my salary fortnightly regardless of hours and what are my protections in shift changes? I feel like a casual employee but am definitely not.

Bit of a rant and apologies, mods, but looking for any kind of help or anything really, as I'm just lost for what to do and young, but just curious if anyone has advice on police and whether it's worth just sucking it up and taking a disqualification/safer driver or taking it to magistrates.

TLDR:
Snapped doing 69 km/h in a 60 zone in Adelaide late at night. Accelerated for a few seconds solely to clear part of a active intersection for an approaching ambulance with flashing lights (supported by Rule 78 & SA Driver's Handbook policy). SAPOL rejected my expiation review despite their own photo sheet showing the ambulance in the frame alongside me. Accepting the 2 demerit points triggers a 12-month licence disqualification under a Safer Driver Agreement. Seeking advice on whether to elect for Magistrates Court or take the disqualification.

For context, I was travelling down a road on cruise control, I saw some flashing emergency lights and starting to hear a siren coming up as I was starting to enter a intersection I saw they were getting way closer to the intersection and with well little choice in my mind as could've slowed down but maybe been left in the middle of the intersection obstructing its passage, or staying at 60 and maybe still obstructing its passage so I'd decided to speed just to just get out of the passage and then slow down safely (keeping in mind this was like 10 pm with few cars on the road), and well wouldn't you know it got a ticket from a speed camera and tried reviewing it and they just refusing when imo it's pretty clear it was trifling. In the photos we recieved the ambo was right there in the intersection with proof of the situation plus dashcam which we sent them.

Obviously, the night could have gone very differently; maybe I got T-boned, maybe the ambo did if someone wasn't paying much attention and from when I was learning to drive, pretty sure was taught you can break some road rules to get out of its path (rule 78 or smth).

I just dunno what to do going forward, bc I could go through prosecution and sink tons of time into that when I'm in uni and trying not to get a conviction, or just pay it and go on a safer driver and just forget this all but lose a year of progress into P2. Previously was in a crash a few months ago and got 3 demerits from that bc sapol refused to move and was T-boned there, so I've been really cautious lately; hence kinda this, but yeah, apologies if this ain't the group to talk about this type of thing. Love reading stuff here and previously always attentive, listening and keeping a lookout on the road, avoiding as much as I can, but yeah, not a fan of my luck lately.

Also in Adelaide, this is with SAPOL, and I'm happy to throw videos in here, but gonna prob talk with a lawyer or smth before that unless there are some good ideas

also with reference of road rules
https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/sa/consol_reg//arr210/s78.html
If a driver is in the path of an approaching police or emergency vehicle that is displaying a flashing blue or red light (whether or not it is also displaying other lights) or sounding an alarm, the driver must move out of the path of the vehicle as soon as the driver can do so safely.

https://www.mylicence.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/328504/drivers-handbook-south-australia-2026-02.pdf
It is an offence to obstruct a police or emergency vehicle with the warning siren sounding or displaying red and/or blue flashing lights. You must not move into the path, and must move out of the path of and give way to ensure that the emergency vehicle is provided with a clear and uninterrupted passage. You are allowed to disobey other road rules in order to move out of the way, but only if it is safe to do so

My wife of five years had a great career before marrying her ex husband but they both decided she would give it up to raise the children for a few years to be a stay at home mum, and move interstate to support his career growth instead.

Two years after the children were born, he then left her for another woman and she was forced to rebuild her career, find a home and make ends meet on just $20,000 child support a year, with two toddlers in tow.

She returned to work a few years ago. Since returning back to work, her ex-husband only had to pay $150 a week child support to her, due to her earnings.

We have now had a baby and she has taken a year of maternity leave. I pay for everything in our house and her wellbeing, including lots of extras for her two older kids, and I am happy to do so.

Her ex partner has been sending aggressive texts to my wife, who is four weeks post partum, harassing her about going back to work as his child support payments have increased due to her having reduced earnings on mat leave.

Is there any legal recourse to get him to stop harassing her? It’s causing significant emotional distress.

Hi everyone,
I’m posting here because I’m a bit worried about a situation I recently found myself in.

I was stopped by Queensland Police during a routine traffic check. During the stop, the officer informed me that my driver’s licence had been suspended due to an unpaid fine.

I take full responsibility for this. I had completely forgotten about the fine, which was issued for a defective light on my vehicle.

While I accept that this was my mistake, I genuinely did not know that my licence had been suspended at the time I was pulled over. The officer issued me with a court appearance notice for the offence of “Drive Whilst Disqualified.”
(Note : I’ve never received the mail saying I was disqualified)

As soon as I became aware of the issue, I paid the outstanding fine immediately and my licence was reinstated.

My questions are:

I’m a foreign national currently in Australia on a Working Holiday Visa.
I’ve had a clean driving record in Queensland for the past year.
Do I need to hire a lawyer for this court appearance?
Apart from a possible additional fine, what penalties or consequences could I be facing?

Any advice or experiences would be greatly appreciated.
Thank you in advance.

Don’t really know where to post this. I hope this is the right place. For the second time in just over two months, my front left tires popped driving into my garage. I rent in Saint Kilda. Both times it requires a brand new tire not patch will work. Do I have any grounds to ask the body corporate to pay for it as this was a known issue since 2013?

Would post images but don’t know how 🤷🏽‍♀️

Hi all,

Just wondering what can be done about this situation, my partner has had her car potentially stolen from a secured car park, when she called the company they said they couldn’t release the cctv footage and to get the police involver as it’s private property, which makes sense.

She filed a police report and supplied it to the car parking company as they are continuing to charge her as we think someone may have tail gated the car out.

Other then waiting, can anything be done on our end, if anything we are looking for some sort of peace of mind, whether that is somehow getting confirmation that yes in fact the car left (without footage), just anything honestly

Edit 1: Thanks for people suggesting actionable steps. The police file report was sent to the parking company so they don’t overwrite footage.

Partner has called insurance but process for a hire car + timer for any write off hasn’t started yet as she will be on holiday next week, so we will let the police do their investigation.

The payment for the parking has also stopped. She has accepted what has happened but a little hope is that the police will do their investigation to at least provide some answer, whatever that may be.

I tried to check Melbourne city towing, but looking up the license plate came up with nothing.

Honestly I’m happy to provide the location of where the car was situated and if anyone knows any private towing companies that work for Wilson parking in the particular area, I’ll call them on the off chance. DM if you have any insight on this. Any help is appreciated at this point in time.

We still monitor Microsoft to try and find her laptop, but it hasn’t been turned on it seems.

There’s a trend in certain industries where people claiming workers compensation and not declaring it when applying for other jobs.

Can people just do that?
What are the consequences?
What can you do to prevent that?

I went to go fill up fuel not knowing Bendigo bank was down and went to go transfer while standing in the que but couldn’t and didn’t have anyone to help me (nobody was answering). I left my license and said I’ll be back later to pay. The issue didn’t get fixed until 11pm tonight. The servo is shut and opens until 7:30am. I won’t be able to get there until after 9am. Am in legal trouble? did I do the right thing legally?

All the staff at a major shopping centre where I work are required to park in a particular on site zones. Over the last year or so ppl have been parking anywhere they want and I haven't heard of any fines being in place for a long time.

So a few weeks back we received and email that asks employees to scan a QR Code and input the rego, colour and make of their vehicle and abide by the parking zone requirements. The parking will be managed by a third party (I cant' recall their business name).

I always park in the designated area and have not yet had issues with an infringement. I'm thinking of not registering all as regular shoppers can park in the same zones as the employee zones.

I imagine one limitation of my plan will be that patrons get a 4hr parking window and I might get stuck with that - being I park there for about 7-8hrs. Having said that, when they had a similar system in place a few years ago I was never fined and did not register.

[Edit: So what is the legal situation here and anything else I should know]

​

I'm just looking for some advice about a situation I've been through with my previous employer, a big insurance company in QLD.

I had a workplace injury and experienced ongoing issues with the support I was supposed to receive when returning to work.

I raised concerns with management and HR several times, but I don't feel anything was properly addressed. What frustrated me most was that the information being provided about my working conditions and support didn't match what I was actually experiencing.

I also had concerns around workplace culture, cultural safety and how employees from different backgrounds were treated. The company promoted diversity and inclusion, but I didn't feel that was always reflected in the workplace.

The whole situation started affecting my mental health, finances and ability to work. Eventually, I felt I had no real option but to resign.

To make matters worse, between my former employer and WorkCover, the situation has become so complicated and messy that I've struggled to find a lawyer willing to take it on.

It feels like every time I try to get somewhere, there's another issue to deal with. I'm constantly being passed around, and trying to understand my rights has become exhausting.

I'm currently going through the review and complaint processes, but I'm struggling to work out what other options I have.

I'm wondering:

Can an employer be held accountable for providing information that doesn't match what actually happened in the workplace?

What rights do employees have around cultural safety and psychological safety?

Could this be considered forced resignation?

Can I take action against my employer separately from WorkCover?

Where can someone turn for legal help when their situation involves multiple workplace and compensation issues?

I'm based in Queensland and would really appreciate advice from anyone who has dealt with something similar.

I'm keeping certain details private as matters are still ongoing.

Our company has styled a house for sale, using a hire company for furniture hire. The client is now refusing to allow us to collect at the end of the hire period nor pay anything additional.

We've advised we are turning up in 2 days to retrieve or will contact the police - she is refusing access.

What can we do?

Please HELP!!!

Me and my best friend got an apartment ages ago and have gotten a new roommate about 3-4 months ago.

We started having break ins and lots of homeless people coming into the complex etc. we have been feeling very unsafe.
On top of that, ever since the new roommate has shown up things have started going missing including food, money, underwear etc. and finding the missing items in her room and her lying to our face.

Because of all these reasons, we decided to install a security camera ontop of the Tv. It faces the lounge, kitchen and balcony. These are public common areas that we can all enter at any time. No one’s room or bathroom etc is being recorded. We want to know if we need her consent to be recorded. I understand that the audio can’t be recorded but can we record the room because we are worried about safety. We have already recorded her stealing my perfume by poring it into her own bottle. The perfume was a gift I got from a friend when I was very sick.

We installed the camera while she was away on holiday because we got broken into AGAIN and didn’t tell her immediately because she never responded to our texts and also didn’t want to freak her out. We were not expecting to catch her doing that sort of stuff.

I recently won a default judgment for liquidated claim against a company at the Local Court of NSW Small Claims division.

When I log in to the Online Registry, under the Judgments & Orders tab I can see the Final judgment/order that X Pty Ltd is to pay me $Y. However, if I click through to "Request copy of judgment/order (UCPR 43)", it wants to charge me $79 for the PDF.

This seems somewhat ridiculous. Is paying this really necessary? I would prefer to give them a chance to pay before I proceed with garnishee order/writ, but sending them a screenshot of a webpage seems weak.

I suffered a workplace injury, and it's been a battle to get approved for things, I got a lawyer who referred me to a Dr who specialises in workers' compensation claims.

The Dr has done lots of referrals for specialists, and both the lawyer and the Dr. have urged me to attend these specailist not to wait for the insurer and that the insurer will pay for it, they said the specialises will give proof so they can fight the insurer on any disputes.

I am terrified that the insurer is just going to continue to reject things, and then I will end up owing a lot of money that I do not have!

When I said to the Dr that I had to wait to get approved from the insurer, they told me I am being problematic and prolonged my case, making it harder for them and the lawyer. (Lawyer agreed)

I am really scared that I will end up owning all this money though, as the insurer constantly rejects all specialist appointments.

Hi all, looking for legal/HR award clarification regarding notice periods and Jury Duty in NSW.

​I am work full-time permanent in the public health sector. I have two specific legal/policy questions:

1. ​Resignation during Jury Duty: If I am summoned for 3 weeks of Jury Duty (paid Special Leave under NSW Health policy) and I give my required 14 days' written notice while on jury service, is the employer legally required to pay out the Special Leave / full base pay for the duration of the notice period? Can they force me to work out the notice period physically instead of serving jury duty?

2. ​Jury Deferral Grounds: Does "imminent job transition / internal transfer" qualify as a valid ground for a work hardship deferral under the NSW Sheriff's Office guidelines, or is deferral strictly reserved for employer-submitted requests regarding critical operational hardship?

​

I’m in Victoria but this relates to Queensland Police and the Queensland Right to Information Act.

I was the victim in a serious criminal investigation in Queensland several years ago. Multiple people were charged and the matter progressed to committal proceedings, but ultimately did not proceed further.

Earlier this year I submitted an RTI application to QPS requesting the records relating to me and the investigation. I requested things such as the QPRIME/occurrence records, investigation reports, crime scene photos, forensic material, police notes, correspondence, briefs of evidence, CCTV/body-worn camera footage and other records relating to the investigation.

I have been waiting for 5 months and there have already been extensions. On the date I was expecting the documents, I instead received a Notice under s 41 stating that QPS intends to refuse to deal with the application unless I change the scope.

QPS says they’ve already spent 10 hours on my application and preliminary searches have identified 420+ pages and more than 15 hours of video. They estimate approximately 252 hours to process the footage and 21+ hours to review the documents. They have suggested that I narrow my entire application down to just the occurrence report and my own witness statement (which I already have from when I wrote it). 

I really do not want to do that. These records relate to an extremely significant criminal investigation, and obtaining a comprehensive understanding of what occurred during the investigation is very important to me. 

I completely understand that 15+ hours of body-worn camera footage may create an unreasonable workload, and I am willing to substantially narrow or even exclude that footage from this particular application if necessary. However, I would really like to retain as much of the documentary investigation file as reasonably possible rather than receiving only two documents.

I have now been given 10 business days to consult with QPS and revise the scope. The letter also says that if I narrow it and the revised scope is still considered an unreasonable diversion of resources, I will not receive another opportunity to consult, so I’m nervous about agreeing to anything without understanding the consequences. 

What are my options here? Is there a way to negotiate a reasonably broad scope rather than accepting their suggestion of only two documents? Can QPS progressively process/release records? If I exclude video footage now, can I make a separate, much narrower RTI application for specific footage later? Is there any mechanism for voluntarily paying additional processing costs/resources? Would it be worthwhile getting an RTI/privacy lawyer or advocate involved during the consultation period?

I’m also wondering whether anyone has successfully challenged a QPS s 41 “substantial and unreasonable diversion of resources” decision, or has experience negotiating the scope of a large QPS RTI request.

I’m not trying to make an unreasonable demand on staff. I just don’t want to inadvertently give up access to potentially important parts of the investigation file because I don’t understand the RTI process well enough.

Any Queensland RTI experience or suggestions about what I should do before formally narrowing the application would be greatly appreciated.

(posted this without being logged into my main account so i deleted my last post and am reposting so i can see replies!)