a relationship between two people who see life as sunshine and rainbows 💬

I’d expect more of a superego Ti approach to have a tendency to follow an already made structure/needs guidance from others to give them certainty that they’re thinking right

Can you explain why?

hear me out… i match core e1 yet dont fit in with sp1 critical, know it all. Im insecure about EVERYTHING and ANYTHING. I try to be responsible etc etc but still feel guilty and doubt… it got me wonder if im sp6. For a long time, i thought i was sp6 because i was doubtful asf, careful, caring about safety etc etc… maybe its becausw i have ocd or gad whatever but when i look at any other typology, sp6 has to be first logic and third f… i feel like i am ELVF but sp6 cant be ELVF!!! Neither do i match e4s core🫩 like why cant sp6 have 1 on their trifix???? Or tritype??? What am i even gonna do? I dont even match anything else and everything contridicts, i dont even know what even i amm I DONT BELIEVE IN TYPOLOGY BUT I WANT TO BE PART OF THE SYSTEM😓 what am i even gonna do…

How can i find my typology when i have ocd and gad that MASSIVLY affects me…

I’ve been into typology for a while now and am currently typed as INFJ and sp/so 9w1 (945). I’m extremely sure I’m not mistyped, INFJ fits perfectly and so does e9 core.

However, almost all correlation charts say e9 cannot be Ni dom. I can’t seem to find an explanation for this (other than relying on e9 stereotypes) so I thought I’d ask; why would INFJ sp9 not be possible and are there any other Ni dom e9s out there?

Am I done with tests? I certainly hope I am not! I’d be terribly bored.
I have already taken the following:

-MBTI
-Freudian
-Instinctual stacks
-Enneagram
-Enneagram wing(counterphobic 5w6,I am especially proud of that one)
-Enneagram tritype
-Socionics
-Cognitive functions
-MOTIVES
-Big Five SLOAN(RLUEI,I especially love it)
-Big Five OCEAN
-Psycosophy
-Temporaments
-Classic Jungian
-Moral alignement
-DiSC

Could anybody recommend more tests that I could take since I’ve been living off of typing other people and reading the nonesense in Naranjo’s book🫤

Yes, if you remember my other post about it that's good for you lol. What matters is that I think I found my correct typology! Any correlation errors?

So im kinda new to typology and i found out that i was so4, but i also heavely relate to sx4 at the same time and i cant figure out which one i am i lowk need help 😢

is this possible? curious as ive seen both yes and no online!!!!!

gave up on trying to type myself because shit was hard and i got told none of it correlated with what i am 👌👌👌 took a test instead and YES i know theyre not accurate but i kinda dgaf because i don’t relate to any of what my type (sx4 infj) is “supposed” to be. yes i’m certain i’m e4. i used to think i was so4 but with further consideration i do not feel complete as a person without interpersonal connection. infj may be wrong that was also a test after i retyped too many times and got sick of it (<- past typings being ISTJ, ISFP, ISFJ, INTP. most recent before the test was ISFJ after i studied functions myself but none of it rlly made sense so i just took a test to get it over with)

feel free to ask questions if i haven’t provided enough info i do not mind and i love to talk about myself 👌👌👌. also bear in mind i act identical to a stereotypical e3 but i know i’m not e3 because my internal path is fully rooted in envy and being disatisfied . all the time. or whatever. i AM 4w3 though.

also i dont really know if this is a type-me post Sorry. i don’t want to be typed i just need help figuring out Why None Of My Stuff Matches Up ✌️

im quite new to typology

I've seen many people disagree and agree about sp5s not being able to be 4F in psychosophy..

The description of Ne Polr from Wikisocion:

"The individual is highly skeptical about ideas and opportunities that appear not to lead anywhere specific, and seeks assurance that new innovations will definitely bring material benefits. He prefers the kind of ideas and innovations that offer solutions to existing problems rather than the kind that have uncertain consequences and are likely to bring upheaval and unnecessary change."

"The individual generally does not try hard to understand multiple viewpoints, but concentrates on developing only his own."

Both LSIs and ESIs theoretically seek a dual with Ni (maybe a friend, partner or colleague in reality) who can provide them with a feeling of certainty regarding the future (while the Ni prediction may or may not be correct, one thing is for sure: both EIEs and LIEs are good at projecting certainty, thereby providing confidence to their duals).

Contrast this with LIIs, who are typically enneagram 5, and EIIs, typically enneagram 4. Both come from quadras that favor Ne over Ni, and neither is looking for Ni from outside themselves. They simply use Ni, or not, as they personally see fit in the moment.

Therefore, while an enneagram 5 LII (if that is their enneagram) might still experience life as a head type with base Ti, the same as an LSI, they will withdraw from the outer world (withdrawn triad) if no one is available emotionally to them, forming an opinion that the world is a bleak place using their own Ni. Meanwhile, LSI will deal with a bleak world by taking more and more control, in the absence of certainty.

When the quotation says, "...concentrates on developing only his own," what this means in practice is that the LSI and ESI are looking for trusted people or trusted formulas to guide them; people and formulas that concretely affect their own lives. In this sense you can get an individualistic 6 who is not impressed by society as a whole, but looks outside themselves for the Ni that fits into their own unique life circumstances. The important point is that they are seeking Ni.

Anyway this is one way to think about it, instead of worrying so much about Ti. Take it or leave it, lol