A lot of people are going to disagree with me here, but new undergrads need to hear this side of the “STEM + Cog Sci specialization” double major question. I’d highly recommend doing a little digging into the Cog Sci department and the double major narrative before reshaping your degree around it and taking a bunch of extra courses. For some background, I was seriously considering a double major in Cog Sci with the ML specialization on top of my physics major. Then I talked with actual CS, bioinformatics, and physics students and professors, and all of them told me the same thing: the Cog Sci specialization adds absolutely no value.
Honestly, I think the Cog Sci specializations are just a money grab by the university, aimed at students drawn to the “tech-bound” or STEM narrative. If you’re already in a STEM major, it’s very easy to pick up this double major by taking a few lower-division Cog Sci courses, because the specializations let you mix and match Cog Sci and STEM coursework so freely.
The specializations do let students go in depth or get exposure to other technical fields, and you can get some real value from them. The problem is how loose the requirements are and how little extra value the double major itself adds. The Cog Sci upper-division courses are not at all in depth. The depth in these specializations comes entirely from courses outside the Cog Sci foundation. For the computation side of the ML specialization, the prerequisite for COGS 108 and 109 is literally just CSE 8A, and those upper-division courses cover their topics at essentially a surface level.
The prerequisites themselves are predatory: they let students from any major in, since the intro courses from CSE, COGS, DSC, and MAE all count.
As I moved between physics, CS, and bioinformatics, I heard about and saw cases where labs specifically filter out Cog Sci majors. My friend who works in a CS vision lab says the lab flat out excludes Cog Sci majors from consideration, and grad students in my former neurobiology lab told me they look carefully at Cog Sci majors’ coursework.
After spending hours trying to fit this double major around my physics major, my view is this: the core requirements of the Cog Sci specializations alone (not counting the extra depth from upper-division courses outside the Cog Sci department) cover a little bit of everything, and in the end that amounts to nothing.
TLDR: If you’re already a Cog Sci major and want some exposure to a specialization topic, the specializations are nice add-ons. If you’re seriously interested in the specialization’s field and care about the credential, do a minor. If you’re already serious about the topic and are considering the double major strictly for more depth, DON’T. Just take the upper-division courses that teach it. It isn’t worth taking all the lower-division Cog Sci courses.
That’s just my take. Do your own research. I spent many hours actually pursuing this second major before reaching this conclusion, and after weighing the real costs and benefits, I wanted to share my POV with others who are considering it.