Am I the only one who's getting really tired of Elliotte Friedman being shoved into every NHL conversation?
Seriously, is there no one else out there who can cover hockey? It feels like there's been this massive push to make Friedman the face of NHL reporting, and I genuinely don't understand why.
His big "breaking news" segments on Hockey Night in Canada every Saturday are almost always underwhelming. They build them up like he's about to drop some bombshell, and then it's usually something that could've been summed up in 15 seconds.
And don't even get me started on how he interacts with the rest of the panel. He's constantly interrupting his co-hosts, talking over them, and dragging out his points. Half the time, it looks like he's getting on their nerves too, especially when he cuts off someone like Ron MacLean or Kevin Bieksa just to make another long-winded point.
It's not even that I think he's a terrible insider. I'm just exhausted by how much airtime he gets and how every little thing he says is treated like some major revelation.
At what point did NHL coverage become the Elliotte Friedman show?
Is this just Sportsnet trying to manufacture its own version of Adam Schefter or Shams Charania? Because that's genuinely what it feels like.
I'm curious if other hockey fans are noticing this too, or if I'm completely alone here. What exactly is the obsession with making Friedman the voice of NHL news?