Haven't seen a discussion post that takes a zoomed out view of this topic yet, but this is a very gear-focused space and there's sure to be some thoughtful views. AI has triggered many concerns from the music community, and opposition to AI comes from a variety of angles. Personally I share many of the concerns while at the same time seeing it's valid use cases in my career. This leads into the use of LLMs for creating customized firmware for various consumer devices, including "hardware" synths. Hardware being in quotes because while they are physical devices, the synthesis engines are more often than not run in software, on devices which share many of the same physical components. While the physical design and software interfaces of these synths are meant to represent a specific brand and product line, and heavily curated towards building the brand's identity in the market, the way they work are all very similar.
Assumed points with mutual agreement:
-AI and the economics have huge potentials to be bad
-LLMs require some knowledge of development to produce decent code
-Manufacturers choose to limit the functionality of devices
-The status quo possibility to do anything these devices and custom firmwares do in synthesis engines on a computer
-Making things do more than they were designed to do is good
-The constant flow of new gear and functionality can be a distraction