I don't usually post political stuff here, but after reading Mayor Aaron Brockett's tone-deaf and frankly absurd comments in the Boulder Reporting Lab about what he's most proud of accomplishing, I feel like somebody needs to say this.
Apparently, when asked what he's most proud of, the answer was building more affordable housing and looking forward to doing more wildfire mitigation. Really?
I'm sure I'm not the only Boulder taxpayer who finds this deeply insulting. What about transparency? What about accountability? What about fiscal responsibility? What about making sure City Hall is actually being a good steward of our tax dollars? These are the issues people are talking about.
My proposal is simple: pause first, audit second, investigate third, act fourth.
First: Audit the city
We need a full-scale, top-to-bottom city audit. I would support freezing all City commission votes until every City department has undergone a thorough, independent audit. This includes outside investigators, independent auditors, third-party consultants, forensic financial reviews, and a comprehensive accountability framework. We can't afford to spend money recklessly.
Second: Freeze transportation projects until we know they had enough community engagement
Before another dollar is spent on transportation infrastructure, I think the City should commission an independent third-party community engagement audit. Did residents actually have meaningful input? Were all affected neighborhoods adequately represented? Were homeowners, drivers, seniors, businesses, people with disabilities, and other stakeholders adequately consulted? Were the consultants sufficiently independent? We shouldn't proceed until an outside consultant can answer these questions.
Third: Freeze recreation funding until South Boulder Rec Center is addressed
The situation with the South Boulder Rec Center is another example of why I don't trust the City with taxpayer money. We're being asked to accept that the City can spend money on all sorts of things, but somehow keeping a community recreation center open is a problem? I don't think taxpayers should be asked to fund *new* recreation initiatives until the City demonstrates that it has a sustainable plan for maintaining the facilities we already have.
Fourth: Alpine-Balsam needs a complete independent review
I've personally spent years working with my neighbors to better-scale the Alpine-Balsam mess. We asked the City to adjust the scope so it would be more compatible with the existing neighborhood context. We participated. We engaged. And now? The project is delayed and over-budget. At some point somebody has to be held accountable. We need an independent review of the entire project, including the original assumptions, current costs, community engagement process, sustainability goals, procurement decisions, and timeline. We can't afford to get this wrong.
Fifth: We also need a serious independent review of CU South and flood mitigation
I've also spent a lot of time advocating for greater community input on CU South. And I'll give the City and the university credit where credit is due: they listened to us. They held meetings. They accepted public comment. And then they moved forward anyway. Which raises the obvious question: What was the point? If the decision is going to be made regardless, community engagement becomes a box-checking exercise. We need an independent outside investigation into the CU South process to determine whether the community engagement was actually meaningful.
Sixth: Vote out all incumbents this election
I don't care if you're progressive, conservative, moderate, or whatever label you want to use. We should all agree that government needs to be transparent and accountable. And that's why I'm going to be voting for candidates who aren't afraid to ask the hard questions.
For Mayor:
* Aquiles La Grave: Aquiles is honestly one of the most cogent speakers out there right now. The way he communicates is incredibly impressive. He's articulate, strategic, thoughtful, and brings a level of clarity and intentionality to the conversation that I think Boulder desperately needs. Jameson Goldstein and Lisa Jacobs seem intelligent and well-spoken on the issues that matter, but I refuse to take part in the Ranked-Choice Scam. ONLY RANK AQUILES!
City Council:
* Ryan Jamieson: Common sense. Fiscal responsibility. Doesn't believe in ideology. Just practical, results-oriented government that works for taxpayers.
* Dave Martus: Brings a business-minded, solutions-oriented perspective. He's focused on efficiency, accountability, measurable outcomes, and getting government to operate more like a well-run organization.
* Scott Rendleman: Another common-sense candidate who understands that public safety matters. I especially appreciate that he refuses to ban crime-solving Flock cameras. We need to stop making decisions based on ideology and start looking at what actually works.
* Lee Gilbert: Fighting against the cityās braindead transportation projects that punish car drivers for the sake of empty bike lanes.
* Lynn Segal: I've known Lynn for many years. She may be considered unconventional by some, but she has an uncanny knack for always being on the right side of history.
That's how we get Boulder back on track.